Compare performance (136 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (31,600 £ vs 41,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD ETP3 or Skoda Enyaq?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
BYD ETP3 is markedly cheaper – starting at 31,600 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 41,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,294 £.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers substantially more range – reaching up to 587 km, about 354 km more than the BYD ETP3.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers significantly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 204 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers considerably more torque with 679 Nm compared to 180 Nm. That’s about 499 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Skoda Enyaq offers more seats – 5 vs 2.
In terms of curb weight, BYD ETP3 is markedly lighter – 1,640 kg compared to 2,179 kg. The difference is around 539 kg.
When it comes to payload, the BYD ETP3 carries visibly more – 780 kg compared to 489 kg. That’s a difference of about 291 kg.
The Skoda Enyaq holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The BYD ETP3 is a smart, no-nonsense electric offering that blends everyday practicality with a quietly modern design that won’t embarrass you in the supermarket car park. It’s ideal for buyers after fuss-free electric mobility — efficient, clever and just playful enough to make city driving a little more fun.
detailsThe Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
31,600 £
|
Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
233 km
|
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
2
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,640 kg
|
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
4,460 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,720 mm
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
|
Height
1,875 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
3,500 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
780 kg
|
Payload
443 - 489 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 HP
|
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
100 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
180 Nm
|
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
100 kW
|
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
BYD
|
Brand
Skoda
|