VS

Citroen Jumper vs Volvo EX40 comparison

Compare performance (279 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (55,100 £ vs 45,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen Jumper or Volvo EX40?

Citroen Jumper vs Volvo EX40: Key differences

Citroen Jumper

details

Volvo EX40

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • visibly more electric range
  • considerably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Jumper

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Volvo EX40 is clearly cheaper – starting at 45,200 £ , while the Citroen Jumper costs 55,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,832 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Volvo EX40 is substantially more efficient: consuming 16.6 kWh/100km compared to 26.2 kWh/100km for the Citroen Jumper. That’s a difference of about 9.6 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo EX40 offers visibly more range – reaching up to 576 km, about 152 km more than the Citroen Jumper.

EX40

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX40 offers clearly more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 279 HP. That’s roughly 163 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX40 delivers clearly more torque with 670 Nm compared to 410 Nm. That’s about 260 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Volvo EX40 offers more seats – 5 vs 3.

In terms of curb weight, Volvo EX40 is considerably lighter – 2,040 kg compared to 2,865 kg. The difference is around 825 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Citroen Jumper carries substantially more – 1,385 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 905 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX40 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £45,200
EX40

Volvo EX40

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 238 - 442 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.6 - 17.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 477 - 576 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX40
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Volvo EX40 and Skoda Elroq offer contemporary takes on the small SUV segment, but they aim at different buyers — Volvo leans toward premium refinement while Skoda focuses on pragmatic value and space. This comparison will look at driving character, interior practicality, technology and running …
Volvo EX40
Volvo EX60
VS
Volvo’s EX40 and EX60 lock horns in a neatly staged duel: the nimble EX40 is a city-savvy, efficiency-first EV built for tight streets and savvy budgets, while the larger EX60 brings more space, stronger performance and longer range for family life and weekend escapes. Pick this showdown for a …
Citroen Jumper
Volvo EX40

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Citroen Jumper

The Citroen Jumper is a no-nonsense workhorse that swaps flash for sheer practicality, with a spacious load area and composed, user-friendly driving manners that make busy workdays easier. It won’t win any beauty contests, but its sensible packaging, comfortable cab and wallet-friendly running make it a compelling choice for tradespeople and small businesses.

details
serpimg_arohJY

Reviews Citroen Jumper

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Volvo EX40

The Volvo EX40 is a compact electric SUV that blends Scandinavian minimalism with a comfortable, high-quality interior suited to daily driving and longer trips. It prioritizes safety and intuitive technology, delivering a calm, refined experience that feels mature and easy to live with.

details
311247_XC40_Recharge
311246_XC40_Recharge
308521_Rear-wheel_drive_more_range_and_faster_charging_for_fully_electric_Volvo

Reviews Volvo EX40

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
Marco
24 Jun 2026, 10:14:05

I find them to be two models that aren't comparable,
the Model Y is much longer and wider.
I would choose the Model Y if it were within 4.50 meters in length.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Bent
16 May 2026, 19:14:01

Stable car and generally good build quality — but I hate the Google and infotainment systems, which both seem designed to irritate the user as much as possible.
I'm looking at a Toyota B4ZX AWD when the lease on my EX40 expires. I need to be able to tow 1,500 kg, but without going broke.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Explorer EV
Volvo EX40
VS
In one corner the burly, tech-heavy Ford Explorer EV tries to translate American SUV swagger into electric range and cargo-flex practicality, while the polished Volvo EX40 delivers Scandinavian poise, efficient packaging and a safety-first, city-friendly footprint. If you crave roomy presence and …
Volvo EX30
Volvo EX40
VS
Comparing the Volvo EX30 and Volvo EX40 helps buyers choose between a compact, city-focused electric crossover and a slightly larger, more practical electric SUV. The EX30 prioritises agility, lower cost and urban ease, while the EX40 offers more interior space, range and family-friendly …
Volvo EX40
Volvo XC40
VS
The Volvo EX40 and Volvo XC40 put two sides of Volvo’s compact-SUV line-up head-to-head: the EX40 is a dedicated electric model focused on efficiency, range and modern tech, while the XC40 is a versatile compact SUV available with petrol, hybrid and electric options that delivers a more traditional …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX40
VS
Comparing the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Volvo EX40 pits two compact premium electric SUVs against each other: the Q4 e-tron brings Audi’s refined driving dynamics and a traditionally upscale cabin, while the EX40 focuses on minimalist Scandinavian design, safety, and efficiency. Choose the Q4 for a …
BMW iX1
Volvo EX40
VS
Choosing between the BMW iX1 and the Volvo EX40 comes down to whether you want a compact electric SUV that emphasizes BMW’s sporty, driver-focused dynamics or one that prioritizes Volvo’s calm, safety-minded comfort. Both deliver premium EV credentials, but they differ in ride character, interior …
BMW iX2
Volvo EX40
VS
BMW iX2 and Volvo EX40 are compact premium electric SUVs that take very different approaches: the BMW iX2 prioritizes sporty handling and driver engagement, while the Volvo EX40 emphasizes Scandinavian comfort, safety, and everyday practicality. This quick comparison will help you choose between a …
Citroen Jumper
Fiat Ducato
VS
Choosing between the Citroen Jumper and the Fiat Ducato means choosing between two closely related large vans that share much of their engineering but differ in trim, equipment and dealer support. I’ll focus on the practical differences—cargo space, driving comfort, economy and running costs—so you …
Volvo EC40
Volvo EX40
VS
Deciding between the Volvo C40 (commonly called the C40 Recharge) and the Volvo EX40 comes down to whether you prefer a coupé‑style compact electric with sharper styling or a more conventional compact electric SUV focused on practicality. This quick comparison will run through range, interior …
Citroen Jumper
Volvo EX40

Costs and Consumption
Price
55,100 - 57,800 £
Price
45,200 - 56,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
26.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
424 km
Electric Range
477 - 576 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
3
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,865 - 2,940 kg
Curb weight
2,040 - 2,170 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
410 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
2,050 mm
Width
1,863 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
560 - 1,385 kg
Payload
430 - 480 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
279 HP
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
410 Nm
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
205 kW
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Citroen
Brand
Volvo
What drivetrain options does the Citroen Jumper have?

The Citroen Jumper is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.