VS

Citroen Jumpy Transporter vs Skoda Kodiaq comparison

Compare performance (180 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (32,100 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen Jumpy Transporter or Skoda Kodiaq?

Citroen Jumpy Transporter vs Skoda Kodiaq: Key differences

Citroen Jumpy Transporter

  • somewhat cheaper
  • clearly more electric range
details

Skoda Kodiaq

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Jumpy Transporter

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Citroen Jumpy Transporter is somewhat cheaper – starting at 32,100 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 37,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,747 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Citroen Jumpy Transporter with 6.2 L/100km. The difference is about 4.7 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Citroen Jumpy Transporter offers clearly more range – reaching up to 328 km, about 206 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.

Kodiaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq offers markedly more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 85 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the Citroen Jumpy Transporter takes 12.1 s. That’s about 5.8 s quicker.

Both models offer the same torque – 400 Nm.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Citroen Jumpy Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is very slightly lighter – 1,684 kg compared to 1,722 kg. The difference is around 38 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Citroen Jumpy Transporter carries significantly more – 1,226 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 663 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kodiaq stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,900
Kodiaq

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 119 - 122 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense family hauler: cavernous boot, clever storage, and a sensible price that makes sense when you’ve got kids and a budget. The VW Tayron trades some of that practicality for sharper looks, a firmer ride and smarter tech — pick it if you want a touch more polish and …
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Skoda Enyaq is the slick, silent EV that turns everyday driving into a techy, whisper-quiet commute, while the Skoda Kodiaq remains the go-anywhere, seven-seat family SUV that swallows luggage and trailers without complaint. Choose the Enyaq for lower running costs, a modern cabin and …
Citroen Jumpy Transporter
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Citroen Jumpy Transporter

The Citroën Dispatch is a steady, no-nonsense transporter that swallows workday demands with quiet confidence while keeping drivers comfortable on long runs. Practical, economical and unfussy, it’s the kind of van that won’t steal the show but will make sure your business runs smoother — and that’s often exactly what you want.

details
serpimg_bc6Rnt

Reviews Citroen Jumpy Transporter

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969
KODIAQ_45646
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
Geert
5 May 2026, 08:49:23

The Skoda Kodiac looks sleeker and is bigger. The Ford Explorer is a bit smaller and there was such a fuss made about it, but it’s disappointing in looks and even worse on the inside.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
zlatko P.
10 Feb 2026, 10:37:54

more for money, pracical

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota RAV4
VS
If you need seven seats, cavernous boot space and a grown-up ride, the Škoda Kodiaq is the sensible family hero that gets the job done without drama; it’s spacious, refined and embarrasses smaller SUVs at the supermarket run. The Toyota RAV4, meanwhile, is the rugged, hybrid-savvy all-rounder — …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC90
VS
If you want pragmatic space and clever value, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family hauler that stretches your budget without feeling cheap; the Volvo XC90, by contrast, pampers with Scandinavian refinement, top-tier safety tech and a calmer motorway demeanour. Choose the Kodiaq for practical boots, …
Opel Grandland
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
Choosing between the Opel Grandland and the Skoda Kodiaq means weighing a stylish, efficient compact crossover against a larger, more practical family SUV. I’ll guide you through how they compare on space, engines, features and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your everyday needs.
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
Hyundai Tucson
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Hyundai Tucson and Skoda Kodiaq pit a stylish, tech-packed compact crossover against a larger, family-focused SUV with up to seven seats. I’ll compare space, comfort, driving character and running costs so you can decide which suits your needs.
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Skoda Kodiaq comes down to whether you value driving finesse and cabin refinement or space and practicality. The CX-5 shines with engaging handling and an upscale interior, while the Kodiaq offers more passenger room, flexible seating and strong …
Skoda Kodiaq
Mitsubishi Outlander
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq and the Mitsubishi Outlander both aim at buyers needing a practical, family-friendly SUV, but they take different approaches—Kodiaq prioritizes space and refinement, while Outlander leans on value and versatility. This comparison highlights the strengths and trade-offs so you can …
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …
Citroen Jumpy Transporter
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
32,100 - 52,000 £
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Consumption L/100km
6.2 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
23.6 - 24.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
222 - 328 km
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 199 g/km
co2
35 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
3 - 6
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,722 - 2,188 kg
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,920 mm
Width
1,864 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
881 - 1,226 kg
Payload
460 - 563 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
120 - 180 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.1 - 13.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
260 - 400 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
88 - 132 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
1,499 - 2,184 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
Brand
Citroen
Brand
Skoda
What drivetrain options does the Citroen Jumpy Transporter have?

The Citroen Jumpy Transporter is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.