VS

Citroen Jumpy Transporter vs Toyota C-HR+ comparison

Compare performance (180 HP vs 343 HP), boot space and price (32,100 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen Jumpy Transporter or Toyota C-HR+?

Citroen Jumpy Transporter vs Toyota C-HR+: Key differences

Citroen Jumpy Transporter

  • a bit cheaper
  • marginally lighter
details

Toyota C-HR+

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • considerably more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Jumpy Transporter

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Citroen Jumpy Transporter is a bit cheaper – starting at 32,100 £ , while the Toyota C-HR+ costs 36,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,861 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Toyota C-HR+ is substantially more efficient: consuming 13.4 kWh/100km compared to 23.6 kWh/100km for the Citroen Jumpy Transporter. That’s a difference of about 10.2 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Toyota C-HR+ offers considerably more range – reaching up to 607 km, about 279 km more than the Citroen Jumpy Transporter.

C-HR+

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR+ offers significantly more power – delivering 343 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 163 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR+ is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.2 s, while the Citroen Jumpy Transporter takes 12.1 s. That’s about 6.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Citroen Jumpy Transporter delivers a bit more torque with 400 Nm compared to 338 Nm. That’s about 62 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Citroen Jumpy Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Citroen Jumpy Transporter is marginally lighter – 1,722 kg compared to 1,810 kg. The difference is around 88 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Citroen Jumpy Transporter carries significantly more – 1,226 kg compared to 655 kg. That’s a difference of about 571 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota C-HR+ is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,000
C-HR+

Toyota C-HR+

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 167 - 343 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 458 - 607 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Kia EV3
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The all-electric Kia EV3 feels like the sensible future in a city-friendly SUV shell — roomy, tech-rich and cheaper to run than the Toyota C‑HR+, which still trades on sharp styling and familiar hybrid/petrol simplicity rather than pure EV brilliance. Choose the EV3 for modern gadgets, punchy …
Toyota bZ4X
Toyota C-HR+
VS
This comparison looks at the Toyota bZ4X versus the Toyota C‑HR: both are compact crossovers but take very different approaches — the bZ4X is a purpose‑built all‑electric SUV while the C‑HR is Toyota’s stylish, efficient petrol/hybrid crossover. I’ll run through the key differences in driving range …
Citroen Jumpy Transporter
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Citroen Jumpy Transporter

The Citroën Dispatch is a steady, no-nonsense transporter that swallows workday demands with quiet confidence while keeping drivers comfortable on long runs. Practical, economical and unfussy, it’s the kind of van that won’t steal the show but will make sure your business runs smoother — and that’s often exactly what you want.

details
serpimg_bc6Rnt

Reviews Citroen Jumpy Transporter

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Toyota C-HR+

The Toyota C‑HR is a distinctive crossover that pairs bold, coupe‑like styling with a comfortable, composed ride suited to daily city and suburban driving. It appeals to buyers who value standout design, practical cabin packaging and a refined, easy‑to‑use experience rather than outright performance or rugged off‑road ability.

details
20250312_01_01_s
20250312_01_04_s
20250312_01_15_s
20250312_01_12_s
20250312_01_05_s

Reviews Toyota C-HR+

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate
Krzysztof
17 Jun 2026, 07:19:28

More comfortable
Visually bigger and nicer
Low energy consumption.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Lexus RZ
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Lexus RZ and Toyota C‑HR+ go head-to-head in a neat showdown of plush electric luxury versus quirky, efficient practicality — one aims for serene, tech-laden refinement, the other hustles value with style. Deciding between them comes down to taste and wallet: do you crave silent sophistication …
Toyota Urban Cruiser
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Comparing the Toyota Urban Cruiser and the Toyota C-HR, you’re choosing between a practical, city-focused compact SUV that emphasizes efficiency and easy maneuverability and a more stylized, tech-forward crossover that leans toward a sportier driving feel and premium touches. If your priority is …
Skoda Enyaq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Škoda Enyaq and the Toyota C‑HR represent very different takes on the modern crossover: the Enyaq is a roomy, all‑electric SUV focused on practicality and range, while the C‑HR is a compact, style‑led crossover available with petrol and hybrid powertrains. Which suits you depends on whether you …
Toyota Yaris Cross
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Toyota Yaris Cross and Toyota C-HR+ go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Toyota Yaris Cross …
Skoda Elroq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Elroq and the Toyota C‑HR comes down to practicality versus personality in the compact crossover class. The Elroq emphasises roomy, clever packaging and value, while the C‑HR focuses on bold styling and efficient drivetrains—pick the Elroq for everyday versatility or the …
CUPRA Tavascan
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The CUPRA Tavascan storms into the compact crossover arena as an electric firebrand with sharp looks and sporty intent, while the Toyota C-HR+ plays the clever, comfort-first contrarian with hybrid thrift and quirky flair. Which one earns your driveway space — the bold, battery-powered Tavascan or …
Tesla Model 3
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Tesla Model 3 and Toyota C-HR+ go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Tesla Model 3 or the …
Tesla Model Y
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Tesla Model Y and Toyota C-HR represent two different approaches to compact crossovers: the Model Y emphasizes electric range, advanced tech and spacious practicality, while the C-HR focuses on bold styling, efficient combustion options and affordability. This comparison cuts through specs and …
Citroen Jumpy Transporter
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
Price
32,100 - 52,000 £
Price
36,000 - 46,300 £
Consumption L/100km
6.2 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
23.6 - 24.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
222 - 328 km
Electric Range
458 - 607 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 199 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
3 - 6
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,722 - 2,188 kg
Curb weight
1,810 - 2,010 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
416 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,920 mm
Width
1,870 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
881 - 1,226 kg
Payload
550 - 655 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
120 - 180 HP
Power HP
167 - 343 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.1 - 13.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.2 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
260 - 400 Nm
Torque
268 - 338 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
88 - 132 kW
Power kW
123 - 252 kW
Engine capacity
1,499 - 2,184 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Citroen
Brand
Toyota
What drivetrain options does the Citroen Jumpy Transporter have?

The Citroen Jumpy Transporter is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.