VS

Citroen Spacetourer vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (180 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (34,800 £ vs 41,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen Spacetourer or Skoda Enyaq?

Citroen Spacetourer vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

Citroen Spacetourer

  • visibly cheaper
  • moderately lighter
  • clearly more trunk space

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • significantly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Video Thumbnail

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Spacetourer

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Citroen Spacetourer is visibly cheaper – starting at 34,800 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 41,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,089 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is considerably more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 23.7 kWh/100km for the Citroen Spacetourer. That’s a difference of about 8.9 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers significantly more range – reaching up to 587 km, about 236 km more than the Citroen Spacetourer.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers substantially more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 160 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Citroen Spacetourer takes 11 s. That’s about 5.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers clearly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 279 Nm more.

Spacetourer

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Citroen Spacetourer offers more seats – 9 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Citroen Spacetourer is moderately lighter – 1,953 kg compared to 2,179 kg. The difference is around 226 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Citroen Spacetourer offers clearly more boot space – 2,011 L compared to 585 L. That’s a difference of about 1,426 L.

When it comes to payload, the Citroen Spacetourer carries significantly more – 914 kg compared to 489 kg. That’s a difference of about 425 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £41,900
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 286 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 538 - 587 km
Citroen Spacetourer
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Citroen Spacetourer

The Citroën SpaceTourer is a quietly practical people carrier that turns the chaos of family transport into a calm, sensible experience. With clever interior packaging and a relaxed ride it makes long trips surprisingly pleasant — even the backseat critics might stop grumbling.

details

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.

details
Citroen Spacetourer
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption

Price
34,800 - 52,100 £
Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
Consumption L/100km
6.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
23.7 - 24.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
217 - 351 km
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 180 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Bus
Body Type
SUV
Seats
8 - 9
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,953 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
Trunk capacity
1,624 - 2,011 L
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
4,983 - 5,333 mm
Length
-
Width
1,920 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
1,890 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
2,700 - 3,300 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
850 - 914 kg
Payload
443 - 489 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
136 - 180 HP
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11 - 12.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
Max Speed
130 - 185 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
260 - 400 Nm
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
100 - 132 kW
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
2,184 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Citroen
Brand
Skoda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.