VS

CUPRA Ateca vs VW T-Roc comparison

Compare performance (300 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (37300 £ vs 26400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – CUPRA Ateca or VW T-Roc?

CUPRA Ateca vs VW T-Roc: Key differences

CUPRA Ateca

4.3 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • significantly quicker from 0–100 km/h
  • slight lighter
  • significantly more trunk space

VW T-Roc

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • decisively cheaper
  • evident more efficient

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ateca

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

VW T-Roc has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 26400 £ , while the CUPRA Ateca costs 37300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10830 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: VW T-Roc manages with 5.50 L and is therefore evident more efficient than the CUPRA Ateca with 6.70 L. The difference is about 1.20 L per 100 km.

T-Roc

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the CUPRA Ateca has a clearly edge – offering 300 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 150 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the CUPRA Ateca is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.90 s. That’s about 4 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: CUPRA Ateca pulls noticeable stronger with 400 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm difference.

Ateca

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, CUPRA Ateca is slight lighter – 1418 kg compared to 1465 kg. The difference is around 47 kg.

In terms of boot space, the CUPRA Ateca offers significantly more room – 485 L compared to 284 L. That’s a difference of about 201 L.

When it comes to payload, CUPRA Ateca minimal takes the win – 522 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 7 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The CUPRA Ateca sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Frequently compared as well

Lexus LBX
VW T-Roc
VS
The Lexus LBX feels like a posh city cocoon — whisper-quiet, well-stitched and leaning into hybrid efficiency and premium touches — while the VW T‑Roc is a cheeky, practical all-rounder that drives with more snap, offers more space and gives better value for the money. Choose the LBX if you want …
Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Roc
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …
CUPRA Ateca
VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £37,300
Ateca

CUPRA Ateca

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 300 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 6.7 - 9.1 L
details

CUPRA Ateca

4.3 (1 Reviews)
rate

The CUPRA Ateca mixes SUV practicality with a seriously sporty attitude, wrapped in aggressive styling and a cockpit that looks like it belongs on a racetrack. It's the kind of car that handles daily life with composure while slipping a grin across your face every time you push it—perfect for drivers who want a practical companion that never apologizes for having fun.

details
New-CUPRA-Ateca-2020_20_HQ
New-CUPRA-Ateca-2020_27_HQ
New-CUPRA-Ateca-2020_40_HQ
New-CUPRA-Ateca-2020_49_HQ
New-CUPRA-Ateca-2020_54_HQ
New-CUPRA-Ateca-2020_61_HQ

VW T-Roc

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate

The VW T-Roc mixes cheeky, coupe-like styling with the everyday sense and space of an SUV, so it looks fun without sacrificing family sense. It’s a likeable all-rounder with tidy road manners and plenty of personality, ideal if you want a car that’s practical enough for chores but entertaining enough to enjoy.

details
DB2025AU01832_medium
DB2025AU01833_medium
DB2025AU01840_medium
DB2025AU01844_medium
DB2025AU01835_medium
DB2025AU01866_medium
DB2025AU01834_medium
DB2025AU01852_medium

Reviews CUPRA Ateca

4.3 (1 Reviews)
rate
Stephan B.
18 Feb 2026, 05:44:55

The Cupra Ateca is technically state-of-the-art. The interior tech is top-notch, the materials feel premium and are genuinely useful. But it’s still a car — a practical tool — and despite the excellent build quality and very solid engine performance, it remains affordable for the average buyer.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Reviews VW T-Roc

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
Ester
17 Sept 2025, 14:29:41

I've been driving the VW T‑Roc for a few months now and I'm totally satisfied. 🚗 The higher seating position gives me a great feeling of security and the visibility in city traffic is excellent. I especially like the modern infotainment system — everything works intuitively and quickly. On the motorway it feels very calm and stable, even at higher speeds. Overall a great car that's a lot of fun and still economical.

CUPRA Ateca
VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
Price
37300 - 51200 £
Price
26400 - 38600 £
Consumption L/100km
6.7 - 9.1 L
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
153 - 207 g/km
co2
126 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1418 - 1628 kg
Curb weight
1465 - 1539 kg
Trunk capacity
485 L
Trunk capacity
284 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1841 mm
Width
1811 - 1828 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
502 - 522 kg
Payload
368 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 300 HP
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 9.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
110 - 221 kW
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
Brand
CUPRA
Brand
VW

Similar Comparisons

Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
Skoda Kamiq is the sensible choice — clever packaging, a surprisingly big boot and a friendlier price tag make it the practical everyman’s crossover. If you crave sharper styling, a firmer, more engaging drive and a touch more tech polish, the VW T‑Roc feels more premium, but expect to pay a little …
SEAT Ateca
VW T-Roc
VS
The SEAT Ateca is the sensible, roomy sibling that prioritises practicality and comfort, while the VW T‑Roc plays the cooler, more characterful role with sharper styling and a slightly cheekier drive — both share the VW Group's solid underpinnings and similar engines. Choose the Ateca if you need …
VW Golf
VW T-Roc
VS
The VW Golf still sets the benchmark in the compact class — a composed, all‑round hatch that rewards drivers with precise steering, efficient engines and sensible practicality for daily life. The VW T‑Roc trades a bit of that pinch‑perfect poise for SUV style, a higher seating position and a …
CUPRA Ateca
SEAT Ateca
VS
The CUPRA Ateca turns the sensible family SUV into a pocket rocket with sharper suspension, a punchier engine and aggressive styling that makes commuting feel like a weekend trackday. If you prefer lower running costs, more comfort and smarter value, the SEAT Ateca is the clear choice — practical, …
Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q3 plays the compact‑premium role perfectly — a hushed, well‑built cabin, polished manners and a level of refinement that makes the higher price feel like an investment in peace of mind. The VW T‑Roc, meanwhile, is the cheekier, better‑value sibling: bolder styling, sprightlier handling …
Volvo XC40
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more …
Toyota Yaris Cross
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers the Toyota Yaris Cross and VW T‑Roc take very different approaches: the Yaris Cross is an ultra-efficient, hybrid-savvy city specialist with nimble handling and low running costs, while the T‑Roc delivers bigger presence, punchier engines and more interior space …
Kia Sportage
VW T-Roc
VS
The Kia Sportage piles on space, comfort and kit — plus that mighty warranty — making family life a breeze, while the VW T-Roc counters with tidier dimensions, sharper steering and a dash of VW polish for city duty. If you want maximum value and long-haul calm, go Sportage; if you crave a nimble …
What drive types are available for the CUPRA Ateca?

The CUPRA Ateca is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.