Compare performance (100 HP vs 116 HP), boot space and price (14,500 £ vs 18,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Dacia Spring or Toyota Aygo?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the competitive landscape of urban mobility, two compact cars stand out with their unique offerings: the Dacia Spring and the Toyota Aygo. As city-friendly SUVs, they promise practicality, efficiency, and a touch of innovation. Let's dive into the specifics to see how these two models compare in the race to win city dwellers' hearts.
The Dacia Spring and the Toyota Aygo are based on two distinct powertrains—electric and petrol, respectively. The Dacia Spring is equipped with an electric motor offering a power output of up to 65 HP (48 kW) and a torque of 113 Nm. It's designed for those who are ready to embrace zero-emission driving with a CO2 rating of 0 g/km, making it extremely appealing for environmentally conscious buyers.
On the other hand, the Toyota Aygo is powered by a reliable 1.0-liter inline-three petrol engine, producing 72 HP (53 kW) and 93 Nm of torque. This petrol engine provides the regular car feel with familiarity in long-range cruising that some drivers value. It emits between 108 and 112 g/km of CO2, positioning it in the C efficiency class.
The Dacia Spring leads in electric efficiency with consumption figures as low as 13.2 kWh/100km and an electric range of up to 228 km, making it perfect for daily urban commutes. The Toyota Aygo, meanwhile, boasts a fuel consumption of about 4.8 to 4.9 L/100km, offering a considerable range when fully fueled—the fuel tank capacity is 35 L.
While neither of these cars is built for the track, they handle the cityscape with ease. The Dacia Spring accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in a modest 13.7 seconds, while its top speed maxes out at 125 km/h, prioritizing economy over speed. In comparison, the Toyota Aygo does the same sprint in about 15.5 seconds with a top speed reaching up to 158 km/h, providing a bit more pep for open-road stretches.
Both models are compact SUVs with dimensions that manage urban environments efficiently. The Dacia Spring measures 3701 mm in length, 1583 mm in width, and 1519 mm in height. It offers a trunk capacity of 308 liters, making it slightly roomier for baggage than the Aygo.
The Toyota Aygo, just a millimeter shorter at 3700 mm in length, is wider at 1740 mm, providing more passenger space but with a slightly smaller trunk capacity of 231 liters. Both carry four passengers and feature five-door designs, enhancing their practicality.
The Dacia Spring and Toyota Aygo represent two intersecting trajectories in urban mobility: electrification versus conventional petrol. The former suits those keen on sustainability and lower running costs, while the latter offers a traditional driving experience with a wider range.
Whichever you choose, both are adept at tackling city streets. Whether you lean towards the cutting-edge greenness of the Dacia Spring or the tried-and-true spirit of the Toyota Aygo, these compact SUVs encapsulate the essence of modern urban driving.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Dacia Spring is noticeably cheaper – starting at 14,500 £ , while the Toyota Aygo costs 18,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,363 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota Aygo offers somewhat more power – delivering 116 HP compared to 100 HP. That’s roughly 16 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota Aygo is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 9.2 s, while the Dacia Spring takes 9.6 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Dacia Spring delivers slightly more torque with 137 Nm compared to 120 Nm. That’s about 17 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 4 people.
In terms of curb weight, Dacia Spring is marginally lighter – 1,070 kg compared to 1,090 kg. The difference is around 20 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Dacia Spring offers clearly more boot space – 308 L compared to 231 L. That’s a difference of about 77 L.
When it comes to payload, the Toyota Aygo carries noticeably more – 420 kg compared to 274 kg. That’s a difference of about 146 kg.
The Dacia Spring holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Dacia Spring is an unpretentious city electric that strips EV ownership down to the essentials, offering clean, fuss-free transport for daily urban life. It won't impress luxury-seekers, but its cheerful practicality and rock-bottom running costs make it a clever, no-nonsense choice for anyone who wants electric mobility without the drama.
details
The Aygo is a cheeky city car that turns congested streets into a playground, with bold styling and sprightly manners that make parking a pleasure rather than a pain. Economical to run and surprisingly well equipped for its size, the Aygo is a smart choice for urban buyers who want personality without a premium price and a car that brings a smile to the daily commute.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
14,500 - 16,900 £
|
Price
18,800 - 24,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
12.4 - 12.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
221 - 225 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
85 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
4
|
Seats
4
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,070 kg
|
Curb weight
1,090 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
308 L
|
Trunk capacity
231 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,583 mm
|
Width
1,740 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
274 kg
|
Payload
420 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
70 - 100 HP
|
Power HP
116 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.6 - 12.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
137 Nm
|
Torque
120 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
52 - 75 kW
|
Power kW
85 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,490 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Dacia
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España