Compare performance (95 HP vs 281 HP), boot space and price (16,800 £ vs 48,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van or Ford Ranger?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van is substantially cheaper – starting at 16,800 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 31,660 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Ranger uses 3.1 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 2 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers clearly more power – delivering 281 HP compared to 95 HP. That’s roughly 186 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Ranger is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.7 s, while the Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van takes 11.9 s. That’s about 3.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers substantially more torque with 697 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 497 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Ranger offers more seats – 5 vs 2.
In terms of curb weight, Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van is significantly lighter – 1,285 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 1,120 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries considerably more – 989 kg compared to 535 kg. That’s a difference of about 454 kg.
The Ford Ranger is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Fiat Qubo van is a compact urban workhorse that hides an impressively practical load area behind deceptively small proportions, making tight city streets and parking a breeze. It’s not flashy, but its sensible layout, easy-to-live-with character and wallet-friendly running make it a solid pick for anyone needing dependable everyday practicality without fuss.
details
The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
16,800 - 17,100 £
|
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
42 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
133 g/km
|
co2
70 - 265 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
|
Seats
2
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
|
Doors
3
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,285 kg
|
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
3,957 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,716 mm
|
Width
1,918 mm
|
|
Height
1,721 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2,500 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
535 kg
|
Payload
845 - 989 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Plug-in Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manual
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
80 - 95 HP
|
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.9 - 13.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
162 - 167 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
190 - 200 Nm
|
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
59 - 70 kW
|
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,248 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2016
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
Fiat
|
Brand
Ford
|