VS

Ford Bronco vs Renault Clio comparison

Compare performance (335 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (58,200 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Bronco or Renault Clio?

Ford Bronco vs Renault Clio: Key differences

Ford Bronco

  • considerably more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • considerably more trunk space
details

Renault Clio

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • clearly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Bronco

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Renault Clio is substantially cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Ford Bronco costs 58,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 41,185 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Clio uses 4.1 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Ford Bronco with 11.3 L/100km. The difference is about 7.2 L/100km.

Clio

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Bronco offers considerably more power – delivering 335 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 177 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Bronco is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.7 s, while the Renault Clio takes 8.3 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Bronco delivers significantly more torque with 563 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 373 Nm more.

Bronco

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Clio is clearly lighter – 1,202 kg compared to 2,289 kg. The difference is around 1,087 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Bronco offers considerably more boot space – 562 L compared to 327 L. That’s a difference of about 235 L.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Clio carries slightly more – 463 kg compared to 411 kg. That’s a difference of about 52 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Clio is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £17,100
Clio

Renault Clio

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
Ford Bronco
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Bronco

The Ford Bronco is a go-anywhere SUV that wraps rugged off-road capability in retro looks and modern tech, promising weekend warriors a grin from first mud splash to last campfire. With removable roofs and doors, a surprisingly polished cabin for everyday life and a wide range of trims, it’s as happy tackling trails as it is turning heads on the school run — adventure with attitude.

details

Renault Clio

The Renault Clio is a smartly styled and practical compact hatch that feels at home in city traffic while offering a surprisingly refined ride. It pairs user-friendly tech and a comfortable interior with a reputation for being economical and easy to live with.

details
Ford Bronco
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption

Price
58,200 - 60,000 £
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
Consumption L/100km
11.3 - 12.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
257 - 288 g/km
co2
92 - 118 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Off-Roader
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,289 - 2,418 kg
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
Trunk capacity
504 - 562 L
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,928 - 1,937 mm
Width
1,768 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
387 - 411 kg
Payload
453 - 463 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
335 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.7 - 7.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
563 Nm
Torque
190 Nm
Number of Cylinders
6
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
246 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
2,694 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General

Model Year
2023
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Renault
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.