VS

Ford Bronco vs Renault Symbioz comparison

Compare performance (335 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (58,200 £ vs 24,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Bronco or Renault Symbioz?

Ford Bronco vs Renault Symbioz: Key differences

Ford Bronco

  • clearly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Renault Symbioz

4.8 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • significantly lighter
  • marginally more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Bronco

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Renault Symbioz is clearly cheaper – starting at 24,700 £ , while the Ford Bronco costs 58,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 33,557 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Symbioz uses 4.5 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Ford Bronco with 11.3 L/100km. The difference is about 6.8 L/100km.

Symbioz

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Bronco offers clearly more power – delivering 335 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 177 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Bronco is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.7 s, while the Renault Symbioz takes 9.1 s. That’s about 2.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Bronco delivers clearly more torque with 563 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 298 Nm more.

Bronco

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Symbioz is significantly lighter – 1,359 kg compared to 2,289 kg. The difference is around 930 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Renault Symbioz offers marginally more boot space – 576 L compared to 562 L. That’s a difference of about 14 L.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Symbioz carries moderately more – 459 kg compared to 411 kg. That’s a difference of about 48 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Symbioz is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £24,700
Symbioz

Renault Symbioz

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 140 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.5 - 6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault Captur
Renault Symbioz
VS
Captur and Symbioz showcase two very different Renault directions: Captur is a practical compact crossover focused on everyday comfort, economy and usability, while Symbioz is a forward‑looking concept exploring electric power, autonomous driving and living‑space ideas. This short comparison will …
Renault Austral
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Renault Austral and the Renault Symbioz represent two very different faces of Renault: the Austral is a production compact SUV focused on practicality and comfort, while the Symbioz is a concept show car that explores radical design and future technologies. Comparing them helps buyers choose …
Ford Bronco
Renault Symbioz

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Bronco

The Ford Bronco is a go-anywhere SUV that wraps rugged off-road capability in retro looks and modern tech, promising weekend warriors a grin from first mud splash to last campfire. With removable roofs and doors, a surprisingly polished cabin for everyday life and a wide range of trims, it’s as happy tackling trails as it is turning heads on the school run — adventure with attitude.

details
FordBronco_CGrey_Dynamic_5-LOW
FordBronco_HPRed_Static_V9-LOW
2023_FORD_BRONCO_BADLANDS_03-LOW
2023_FORD_BRONCO_BADLANDS_04-LOW
2023_FORD_BRONCO_BADLANDS__INTERIOR_28-LOW

Reviews Ford Bronco

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Renault Symbioz

The Renault Symbioz is a forward-looking concept car that imagines a seamless link between vehicle and home, pairing a lounge-like cabin with striking, futuristic styling. More idea than production plan, it showcases Renault's vision for connected, autonomous and sustainable mobility while provoking debate about how we will live and travel.

details
R-DAM_1579937
R-DAM_1580039
R-DAM_1579964

Reviews Renault Symbioz

4.8 (5 Reviews)
rate
PF
19 Feb 2026, 11:56:45

A delightful hybrid (family car). Roomy, quick (combined nearly 150 hp) and safe.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Michael
5 Dec 2025, 23:17:28

I've been driving the Symbioz Full Hybrid with the iconic trim for 3,500 km. I test-drove both cars. I think the win goes to the Symbioz. Good quality at a family-friendly price. Unfortunately the Opel is simply too expensive. Strangely, what never really gets mentioned is that the Symbioz's suspension is absolutely superb.

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
Here’s a straightforward comparison between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which fits your needs. The Arkana is a production compact crossover focused on practicality and hybrid efficiency, while the Symbioz is Renault’s forward-looking electric concept showcasing …
Renault Symbioz
Mitsubishi Grandis
VS
The Renault Symbioz is pure auto theater — a futuristic, electric concept that showcases bold ideas about autonomous driving and cabin-as-living-room luxury rather than everyday practicality. The Mitsubishi Grandis, by contrast, is a dependable, no‑nonsense people‑carrier: roomy, affordable and …
Ford Kuga
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible compact SUV — roomy, practical and built for real-world family duties rather than showpieces, making it an easy buy if you need reliability and space. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is a swooping, tech-heavy concept car: brilliant to admire and full of futuristic …
Omoda 5
Renault Symbioz
VS
This comparison pits the Omoda 5 against the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which car fits your needs. We'll cover design, practicality, driving experience, technology and running costs so you can tell whether the pragmatic, value-oriented Omoda 5 or the more futuristic Renault Symbioz aligns …
Dacia Duster
Renault Symbioz
VS
This quick comparison pits the practical, budget‑minded Dacia Duster against Renault’s forward‑looking Symbioz concept. The Duster is a compact SUV built around affordability, ruggedness and simple, proven technology, while the Symbioz is a showpiece electric concept focused on advanced …
Peugeot 3008
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Peugeot 3008 and the Renault Symbioz represent two very different takes on modern motoring: the 3008 is a production compact SUV known for its practicality and refined interior, while the Symbioz is Renault’s forward‑looking concept showcasing electric, autonomous and connected technologies. …
Hyundai Tucson
Renault Symbioz
VS
Comparing the Hyundai Tucson and the Renault Symbioz highlights two very different approaches: the Tucson is a practical, mass-market compact SUV, while the Symbioz is Renault's forward-looking concept exploring autonomous, electrified mobility. If you're deciding between a ready-to-drive family …
Peugeot 308
Renault Symbioz
VS
In the battle of French engineering, the Peugeot 308 and Renault Symbioz offer distinct experiences for automotive enthusiasts. The Peugeot 308 showcases a balance of agile handling and efficient fuel economy, making it a practical choice for everyday driving. Meanwhile, the Renault Symbioz steps …
Ford Bronco
Renault Symbioz

Costs and Consumption
Price
58,200 - 60,000 £
Price
24,700 - 31,100 £
Consumption L/100km
11.3 - 12.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
257 - 288 g/km
co2
102 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Off-Roader
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,289 - 2,418 kg
Curb weight
1,359 - 1,465 kg
Trunk capacity
504 - 562 L
Trunk capacity
492 - 576 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,928 - 1,937 mm
Width
1,797 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
387 - 411 kg
Payload
455 - 459 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
335 HP
Power HP
140 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.7 - 7.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 11 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
563 Nm
Torque
250 - 265 Nm
Number of Cylinders
6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
246 kW
Power kW
103 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
2,694 cm3
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2023
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
Brand
Ford
Brand
Renault
Is the Ford Bronco offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Bronco is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.