VS

Ford Kuga vs Volvo EX60 comparison

Compare performance (243 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 54,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Volvo EX60?

Ford Kuga vs Volvo EX60: Key differences

Ford Kuga

4.2 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • considerably lighter
details

Volvo EX60

  • considerably more power
  • considerably more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kuga

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Ford Kuga is clearly cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Volvo EX60 costs 54,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 19,749 £.

As for electric range, the Volvo EX60 offers considerably more range – reaching up to 810 km, about 742 km more than the Ford Kuga.

EX60

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX60 offers considerably more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 243 HP. That’s roughly 437 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX60 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Ford Kuga takes 7.3 s. That’s about 3.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX60 delivers significantly more torque with 790 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 550 Nm more.

Kuga

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Kuga is considerably lighter – 1,526 kg compared to 2,190 kg. The difference is around 664 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Kuga carries somewhat more – 550 kg compared to 460 kg. That’s a difference of about 90 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX60 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £54,000
EX60

Volvo EX60

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 374 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.7 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 620 - 810 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX40
Volvo EX60
VS
Volvo’s EX40 and EX60 lock horns in a neatly staged duel: the nimble EX40 is a city-savvy, efficiency-first EV built for tight streets and savvy budgets, while the larger EX60 brings more space, stronger performance and longer range for family life and weekend escapes. Pick this showdown for a …
Audi Q6 e-tron
Volvo EX60
VS
The Audi Q6 e‑tron and the Volvo EX60 go head‑to‑head as premium electric SUVs — one serving up sporty German precision, the other offering calm Scandinavian comfort and safety. We'll compare range, tech, driving feel and everyday usability to help you decide which one earns a spot in your garage …
Ford Kuga
Volvo EX60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Kuga

The Kuga is Ford’s adaptable family SUV that blends usable space with a surprisingly lively driving character, making daily commutes and weekend escapes equally enjoyable. With smart interior packaging, an easy-to-use infotainment setup and composed road manners, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want a bit of fun without the fuss.

details
ford-kuga-black-edition_exteriores_vignale_14sept2022_0085-LOW
ford-kuga-black-edition_exteriores_vignale_14sept2022_0238-LOW
FORD_KUGA_ST-LINE_PHEV_024-LOW

Reviews Ford Kuga

4.2 (6 Reviews)
rate
Richie Wid
3 Apr 2026, 13:13:55

PHEV model — very pleased with the car after 2.5 years. In the summer months it runs practically on electric power alone. The large 2.5‑litre engine is surprisingly frugal, about 0.5 l/mil. Downsides are the ventilation in winter, which causes fogged windows, and that we can now only charge the battery to 80%.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Miguel
19 Oct 2025, 05:54:42

It's a car that strikes an excellent balance between quality and price.

Volvo EX60

The Volvo EX60 arrives as a sleek, family-friendly electric SUV that blends Scandinavian restraint with a surprising dash of personality, wrapping a calm, premium cabin around practical everyday usability. It’s aimed at buyers who prize safety and comfort but still want a car that rewards an enthusiastic drive, proving that sensible can be quietly fun.

details
Volvo-EX60
serpimg_XMUALo

Reviews Volvo EX60

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX60
VS
Practical Czech engineering goes up against Swedish style in our showdown between the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo EX60. The Enyaq focuses on roomy practicality and sensible value, while the EX60 answers with sharper design, richer tech and a more premium feel — choose based on whether you want …
Mercedes GLB
Volvo EX60
VS
Line up the pragmatic, boxy Mercedes GLB — a family-friendly compact SUV that prides itself on space and sensible engineering — against the sleek, tech-forward Volvo EX60 with its unmistakable Scandinavian design and safety-first instincts. It’s a clash of personalities: German practicality and …
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
Volvo EX90
Volvo EX60
VS
Volvo's all-electric duo—the flagship EX90 and its sleeker, more compact EX60—go head-to-head in a battle of tech, space and real-world practicality. We'll cut through the Scandinavian serenity to tell you which suits a growing family, the eco-commuter, or your taste for tech and luxury (and which …
Volvo XC60
Volvo EX60
VS
Meet the Volvo XC60 and the new Volvo EX60 — two mid‑size premium SUVs that look like cousins but drive like rivals, one rooted in combustion tradition and the other staking Volvo’s claim in the electric future. Which should you buy: the familiar, comfort-first XC60 that does everything reliably …
Polestar 4
Volvo EX60
VS
Polestar 4 and Volvo EX60 go head-to-head in a clash of Scandinavian design, tech and electric muscle — one is a sporty provocateur, the other a polished family flagship. Time to find out which brings the sharper drive, smarter cabin and better real-world value for buyers who want style with …
Polestar 3
Volvo EX60
VS
Two Scandinavian siblings square up for the tech‑luxury crown: the razor‑edged, driver‑focused Polestar 3 vs the elegant, safety‑obsessed Volvo EX60. We're lining them up to find which deserves your money—and your garage: the sharp, sporty statement or the cosseting, clever cruiser.
ZEEKR 7X
Volvo EX60
VS
The Zeekr 7X and Volvo EX60 go head-to-head in our compact-luxury EV showdown, pitting China’s tech-forward bravado against Sweden’s calm, safety-first pedigree. We drive them back-to-back to find which delivers more range, refinement and real-world value — and which one you'll actually enjoy …
Ford Kuga
Volvo EX60

Costs and Consumption
Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
Price
54,000 - 70,100 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.7 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
68 km
Electric Range
620 - 810 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
55 - 154 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
Curb weight
2,190 - 2,425 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
523 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,882 mm
Width
1,899 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
541 - 550 kg
Payload
435 - 460 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
Power HP
374 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 5.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
240 Nm
Torque
480 - 790 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
Power kW
275 - 500 kW
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,026 - 2,027
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Volvo
What drive types are available for the Ford Kuga?

The Ford Kuga is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.