VS

Ford Puma vs Ferrari Purosangue comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 725 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 324,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Ferrari Purosangue?

Ford Puma vs Ferrari Purosangue: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • clearly lighter
details

Ferrari Purosangue

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Ford Puma is clearly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Ferrari Purosangue costs 324,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 300,834 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Puma uses 5.4 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ferrari Purosangue with 17.1 L/100km. The difference is about 11.7 L/100km.

Purosangue

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ferrari Purosangue offers significantly more power – delivering 725 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 557 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ferrari Purosangue is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.3 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 4.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ferrari Purosangue delivers clearly more torque with 692 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 402 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Ford Puma offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,033 kg. The difference is around 717 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 404 - 417 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …
Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
Ford Puma
Ferrari Purosangue

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Ferrari Purosangue

Ferrari Purosangue flips the script on what a Ferrari can be, marrying the brand's savage performance and intoxicating exhaust note with the space and practicality of a usable grand tourer. For buyers who crave supercar drama without sacrificing everyday comfort, the Purosangue offers theatrical driving thrills and enough presence to stop traffic at the valet.

details
serpimg_JGrs5U

Reviews Ferrari Purosangue

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Bayon
VS
Ford Puma and Hyundai Bayon are compact crossover rivals that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling and efficient engines. This quick comparison highlights how they differ in driving feel, cabin practicality, equipment and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your daily needs.
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Kona
VS
The Ford Puma and Hyundai Kona are two of the most popular compact crossovers, combining practical interiors, elevated driving positions and city-friendly footprints. Choosing between the Puma’s engaging handling and efficient mild-hybrid options and the Kona’s broader engine range and tech-rich …
Ford Puma
Jeep Avenger
VS
The Ford Puma and Jeep Avenger are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want city-friendly dimensions, practical interiors and a dose of SUV styling. The Puma leans toward sporty handling, clever packaging and frugal petrol/mild-hybrid options, while the Avenger prioritises rugged looks and an …
Ford Puma
Lexus LBX
VS
Small crossover clash: the Ford Puma brings cheeky driving dynamics and clever practicality, while the Lexus LBX counters with quiet refinement and premium flair. Pick the Puma if you want fun and value, choose the LBX if you crave comfort and a luxury badge — either way, you’ll be trading up from …
Ford Puma
MG MG3
VS
The Ford Puma and MG3 are popular compact cars aimed at buyers who want affordable, practical transport with low running costs. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how the Puma’s sharper driving dynamics and roomier interior stack up against the MG3’s strong equipment levels and …
Ford Puma
VW Polo
VS
Comparing the Ford Puma and the VW Polo comes down to choosing between a compact crossover that brings extra practicality and a semi-sporty feel (the Puma) and a traditional supermini that prioritizes refinement, build quality and precise handling (the VW Polo). Both are excellent everyday cars — …
Ford Puma
Ferrari Purosangue

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
324,700 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
17.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
389 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
100 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
2,033 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
473 L
Length
-
Length
4,973 mm
Width
1,805 mm
Width
2,028 mm
Height
-
Height
1,589 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
-

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
725 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
312 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
692 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
12
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
533 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
6,496 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2023
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Ford
Brand
Ferrari
What drivetrain options does the Ford Puma have?

The Ford Puma is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.