Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs GWM ORA 05 comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 160 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 23,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or GWM ORA 05?
Ford Puma vs GWM ORA 05: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
GWM ORA 05 is marginally cheaper – starting at 23,100 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 780 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Puma uses 5.4 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the GWM ORA 05 with 6.9 L/100km. The difference is about 1.5 L/100km.
Puma
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers very slightly more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 160 HP. That’s roughly 8 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the GWM ORA 05 takes 9.3 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers very slightly more torque with 290 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is slightly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,560 kg. The difference is around 244 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers slightly more boot space – 523 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 101 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries markedly more – 469 kg compared to 360 kg. That’s a difference of about 109 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
GWM ORA 05
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
GWM ORA 05
The ORA 05 is a stylish electric hatch that mixes playful, modern styling with a well-finished cabin aimed at urban drivers. It delivers comfortable, composed city driving and sensible practicality, making it a compelling choice for buyers who want an easy-to-live-with, characterful EV.
details
Ford Puma
GWM ORA 05
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
23,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
6.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
158 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,560 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
422 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,833 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
360 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
160 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
118 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
GWM
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.