Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Honda Civic – Which model is better for everyday use?
Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Honda Civic?
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the Honda Civic costs 32500 £. That’s a price difference of around 7714 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Honda Civic manages with 4.70 L and is therefore slightly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.70 L per 100 km.
Civic
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Honda Civic has a barely noticeable edge – offering 184 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 16 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Honda Civic takes 7.80 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs to a small extent better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Honda Civic tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Honda Civic pulls barely noticeable stronger with 315 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm difference.
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is slightly lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1517 kg. The difference is around 201 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers noticeable more room – 523 L compared to 410 L. That’s a difference of about 113 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs slight better – up to 1283 L, which is about 63 L more than the Honda Civic.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma a bit takes the win – 469 kg compared to 397 kg. That’s a difference of about 72 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Honda Civic proves to be only a minor advantage and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Honda Civic is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £32,500
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Honda Civic
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Honda Civic
The Honda Civic mixes practical daily usability with a surprisingly engaging driving character, wrapping clever interior design and dependable engineering in a tidy, modern package. It’s a smart buy for drivers who want sensible reliability, a bit of fun behind the wheel, and a shape that never looks like it’s trying too hard.
details
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Ford Puma
Honda Civic
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
32500 - 35500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
108 - 114 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
40 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1517 - 1533 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
404 - 410 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4560 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1890 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1408 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1187 - 1220 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
348 - 397 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
184 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 8.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
315 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
135 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1993 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Honda
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.