Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Honda e:Ny1 comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 204 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 33,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Honda e:Ny1?
Ford Puma vs Honda e:Ny1: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Puma is visibly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Honda e:Ny1 costs 33,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,506 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is clearly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 18.2 kWh/100km for the Honda e:Ny1. That’s a difference of about 5.2 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 5 km more than the Honda e:Ny1.
e:Ny1
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Honda e:Ny1 offers moderately more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Honda e:Ny1 takes 7.6 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Honda e:Ny1 delivers only slightly more torque with 310 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is markedly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,730 kg. The difference is around 414 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries clearly more – 469 kg compared to 350 kg. That’s a difference of about 119 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Honda e:Ny1
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Honda e:Ny1
The Honda e:Ny1 arrives as a cheeky, compact electric crossover that blends bold styling with clever practicality, perfect for city life and weekend escapes. Inside it's clean and tech-forward, offering a relaxed driving experience with enough space and refinement to make daily commutes feel surprisingly grown-up — and yes, the smile factor is real.
details
Ford Puma
Honda e:Ny1
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
33,400 - 36,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.2 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
412 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,730 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
344 - 361 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,387 mm
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,790 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,584 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,136 - 1,176 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
350 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
204 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
310 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
150 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2023
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Honda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.