Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Jeep Compass - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 213 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 34200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Jeep Compass?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Puma has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £ , while the Jeep Compass costs 34200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9429 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Puma manages with 5.40 L and is therefore barely noticeable more efficient than the Jeep Compass with 5.80 L. The difference is about 0.40 L per 100 km.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s evident more efficient than the Jeep Compass with 17.50 kWh. That’s a difference of about 4.40 kWh.
As for electric range, the Jeep Compass performs distinct better – achieving up to 500 km, about 124 km more than the Ford Puma.
Compass
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Jeep Compass has a evident edge – offering 213 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 45 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Jeep Compass takes 8.50 s. That’s about 1.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs to a small extent better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Jeep Compass tops out at 188 km/h. The difference is around 22 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Jeep Compass pulls to a small extent stronger with 345 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 55 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is distinct lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1667 kg. The difference is around 351 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Jeep Compass offers hardly perceptible more room – 550 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 27 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Jeep Compass performs slightly better – up to 1561 L, which is about 278 L more than the Ford Puma.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Jeep Compass holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Puma
Jeep Compass
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £34,200
Jeep Compass
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Jeep Compass
2.3 (2 Reviews)
The Jeep Compass packs classic Jeep styling with a surprisingly composed demeanor, equally at home turning heads in the city or tackling a weekend dirt track. Inside it's a pragmatic, user-friendly compact SUV that prioritizes comfort and versatility — a smart pick if you want a dose of adventure without giving up everyday sense.
details
Ford Puma
Jeep Compass
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
34200 - 43200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.80 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.50 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
500 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
74 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 - 130 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1667 - 2198 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
550 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4552 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1928 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1675 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1561 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
-
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
145 - 213 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 - 188 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
107 - 157 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.