Compare performance (168 HP vs 225 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 34,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Jeep Compass?
When it comes to choosing the right SUV, two standout models on the market are the Ford Puma and the Jeep Compass. Both vehicles offer a blend of style, performance, and technology, but their differences cater to different driver preferences. In this article, we’ll delve into their technical specifications and innovations to help you decide which one best fits your lifestyle.
The Ford Puma boasts a sleek and sporty design, with a length ranging from 4186 to 4226 mm, and a width of 1805 mm. Its height sits at around 1550 mm, offering a compact yet high-riding stance typical of urban SUVs.
Conversely, the Jeep Compass presents a more robust and rugged appearance. It measures 4404 mm in length and 1819 mm in width, with a taller profile at 1629 to 1649 mm. This design aligns with Jeep's adventurous heritage, making it an appealing option for those who enjoy outdoor excursions.
The Ford Puma offers a variety of petrol and MHEV engine options with power ratings ranging from 125 to 168 HP. With a focus on efficiency, the Puma can achieve a fuel consumption figure between 5.4 and 6 L/100km, and it has an impressive electric range of up to 376 km for its MHEV variant, backed by a battery capacity of 43 kWh.
On the other hand, the Jeep Compass provides a robust lineup of engines, including petrol and plugin hybrid variants. These options give a power range from 130 HP to 240 HP, and the Compass's automatic transmission options include dual-clutch technology. Fuel consumption ranges from 2 L/100km for the hybrid to 5.5 L/100km for gasoline versions, while its electric range boasts a shorter 36 km, reflecting its hybrid nature.
The Puma offers a spirited driving experience, with a 0-100 km/h acceleration time ranging from 7.4 to 9.8 seconds, depending on the engine variant. The front-wheel-drive configuration enhances agility, making it enjoyable for city driving and weekend adventures alike.
In comparison, the Jeep Compass also holds its ground in performance, achieving 0-100 km/h in as little as 7.3 seconds. The availability of an all-wheel-drive option signifies its capability for off-road situations, appealing to those who crave more rugged terrain exploration.
Inside the Ford Puma, you will find a modern cabin designed with comfort in mind, comfortably seating five passengers. The trunk capacity is impressive, providing between 456 and 523 liters of space, depending on the variant—ideal for families and road trips.
Similarly, the Jeep Compass offers a spacious interior with seating for five, but it falls slightly short in cargo space—offering 420 to 438 liters. However, the Jeep is designed with versatility in mind, with multiple configurations to manage your gear.
Ford’s latest technology integrations in the Puma include advanced infotainment systems with connectivity features such as Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, ensuring drivers stay connected while on the road.
Meanwhile, the Jeep Compass showcases its off-road heritage through features like the Uconnect infotainment system, which integrates navigation, vehicle diagnostics, and more, elevating the driving experience whether on the highway or on rugged trails.
Both the Ford Puma and the Jeep Compass present compelling options for SUV enthusiasts. The Puma excels in efficiency, sporty design, and modern tech, making it ideal for urban drivers seeking practicality and performance. Conversely, the Compass stands strong with its rugged design, off-road capabilities, and powerful engine options, catering to adventurous souls.
Ultimately, your choice will depend on your driving needs—whether you're looking for a nimble and efficient city SUV like the Puma or a robust and adventurous model like the Compass. Test driving both vehicles is recommended to find the perfect fit for your lifestyle.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma is considerably cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Jeep Compass costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,286 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jeep Compass uses 3 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.4 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is markedly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 17.5 kWh/100km for the Jeep Compass. That’s a difference of about 4.5 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Jeep Compass offers moderately more range – reaching up to 500 km, about 83 km more than the Ford Puma.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Jeep Compass offers markedly more power – delivering 225 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 57 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Jeep Compass takes 8 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Jeep Compass delivers somewhat more torque with 345 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 55 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is noticeably lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,667 kg. The difference is around 351 kg.
The Jeep Compass holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
The Jeep Compass packs classic Jeep styling with a surprisingly composed demeanor, equally at home turning heads in the city or tackling a weekend dirt track. Inside it's a pragmatic, user-friendly compact SUV that prioritizes comfort and versatility — a smart pick if you want a dose of adventure without giving up everyday sense.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
34,200 - 43,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
95 - 500 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
74 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 - 130 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,667 - 2,198 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
550 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,552 mm
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,675 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,561 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
-
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
145 - 225 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 - 188 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
107 - 165 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,596 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España