VS

Ford Puma vs Jeep Renegade comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 240 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 26,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Jeep Renegade?

Ford Puma vs Jeep Renegade: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat cheaper
  • substantially more electric range
  • marginally lighter
  • visibly more trunk space
details

Jeep Renegade

  • noticeably more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Puma

Urban Warriors: Ford Puma vs. Jeep Renegade

The automotive world is no stranger to the rising trend of compact SUVs, a perfect blend of efficiency and performance suitable for city streets and rugged terrains alike. Two prominent players in this category are Ford's stylish Puma and Jeep's robust Renegade. Both cars offer exciting features and innovative technology, catering to varying needs and preferences. This article delves into the comparison of their technical aspects and innovations to aid potential buyers in making an informed decision.

Renegade

Powertrain and Performance

The Ford Puma presents a range of power options, including petrol mild hybrids and electric variants. The most powerful offering reaches 168 HP, delivering torque up to 290 Nm and achieving an optimal balance of performance and fuel efficiency with a co2 output rating as low as 0 g/km on its electric variant. The Puma further offers manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, all complementing its front-wheel-drive configuration. Acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h takes between 7.4 and 9.8 seconds, dependent on the engine choice, and a top speed reaching up to 210 km/h.

Meanwhile, the Jeep Renegade also offers a diverse range in its lineup, including petrol mild hybrids and a more eco-friendly plug-in hybrid option. Delivering power between 130 and 240 HP, the Renegade is equipped with dual-clutch automatic or standard automatic transmissions, paired with either front-wheel or all-wheel drive. Accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h ranges from 7.1 to 9.7 seconds, matching the Puma's speed efficiency, while offering a slightly different driving experience with its 191 to 199 km/h top speed.

Puma

Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Impact

The Puma's prowess in fuel efficiency is highlighted by its consumption figures, ranging from 5.4 to 6 L/100 km for petrol variants and 13.1 to 13.7 kWh/100 km for the electric model. Its electric variant can travel up to an impressive 376 km on a single charge, with a battery capacity of 43 kWh.

On the other hand, the Renegade's standout feature is its plug-in hybrid configuration, boasting a significant reduction in fuel consumption at 2.1 L/100 km, although with a much shorter electric range of 36 km. The CO2 efficiency class favours the plug-in hybrid with ratings as low as B, though higher for other variants.

Renegade

Dimensions and Practicality

With a length up to 4226 mm, width of 1805 mm, and height between 1550 and 1555 mm, the Ford Puma houses a spacious interior without compromising on a compact exterior. The trunk capacity offers ample storage space from 456 to 523 liters, making it practical for urban family adventures.

The Jeep Renegade is slightly taller at heights between 1684 and 1718 mm, offering a broader stance with its signature rugged appeal. Its trunk is somewhat smaller at 330 to 351 liters, a compromise for its off-road capabilities and slightly larger payload capacity, accommodating between 545 and 570 kg.

Puma

Conclusion

Choosing between the Ford Puma and Jeep Renegade often boils down to personal priorities. The Puma caters to those seeking a sportier edge with viable electric options, emphasizing fuel efficiency and modern design. Conversely, the Renegade offers a more rugged approach, with off-road capabilities and hybrid technologies appealing to environmentally conscious adventurers. Both vehicles represent excellent choices in their own right, suiting different lifestyles and driving preferences. For those in the market for a versatile and dynamic compact SUV, the decision ultimately rests on the finesse of urban elegance or the allure of adventurous capability.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Ford Puma is somewhat cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Jeep Renegade costs 26,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,743 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jeep Renegade uses 2.1 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 3.3 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers substantially more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 381 km more than the Jeep Renegade.

Renegade

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Jeep Renegade offers noticeably more power – delivering 240 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 72 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jeep Renegade is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 7.1 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers a bit more torque with 290 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is marginally lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,420 kg. The difference is around 104 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers visibly more boot space – 523 L compared to 351 L. That’s a difference of about 172 L.

When it comes to payload, the Jeep Renegade carries slightly more – 570 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 101 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Jeep Renegade holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £26,700
Renegade

Jeep Renegade

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 130 - 240 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.1 - 5.5 L/100km
  • Electric Range 36 km
Ford Puma
Jeep Renegade

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details

Jeep Renegade

The Jeep Renegade wears its chunky, boxy looks like a badge of character, blending genuine off-road swagger with city-friendly manners so it feels at home on a muddy trail or a tight urban lane. Inside you'll find a surprisingly practical cabin with rugged touches and clever storage, making it a sensible choice for buyers who want a compact SUV with personality rather than just another anonymous crossover.

details
Ford Puma
Jeep Renegade

Costs and Consumption

Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
26,700 - 39,200 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.1 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
36 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
48 - 125 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
36 - 48 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,770 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
330 - 351 L
Length
-
Length
4,236 mm
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,805 mm
Height
-
Height
1,684 - 1,718 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,277 - 1,297 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
545 - 570 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
130 - 240 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.1 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
191 - 199 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
96 - 177 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,469 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Jeep
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.