Compare performance (168 HP vs 204 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 30,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Kia EV3?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The automotive landscape is rapidly evolving, with car manufacturers developing innovative SUVs that blend efficiency with performance. Two such standout models in this realm are the Ford Puma and the Kia EV3. While both vehicles reside in the SUV category, they each bring something unique to the table, catering to different driving preferences and eco-friendly inclinations.
The Ford Puma offers diverse engine options, catering to both traditional and forward-thinking drivers. With petrol mild-hybrid (MHEV) and electric variants, the Puma provides a range of power outputs between 125 and 168 HP. The acceleration isn't its defining characteristic, but with a respectable 0 to 100 km/h time ranging from 7.4 to 9.8 seconds, it offers a balanced drive. The Puma's top speed varies, peaking at 210 km/h in its strongest configurations.
Meanwhile, the Kia EV3 is univocally an electric marvel, boasting a robust 204 HP. This power translates to a swift acceleration time, rocketing from 0 to 100 km/h in approximately 7.5 to 7.9 seconds. Although its top speed is slightly temperate at 170 km/h, the smooth and quiet electric driving experience promises to delight eco-conscious drivers.
For those prioritizing greener credentials, the Puma and EV3 both shine, albeit differently. The Puma's electric model offers an electric range up to 376 km, with a relatively efficient consumption between 13.1 and 13.7 kWh/100km, thanks to its 43 kWh battery capacity. On the other hand, the Kia EV3 excels in this domain, offering an impressive electric range up to 605 km, depending on the selected battery capacity of either 58.3 or 81.4 kWh. The Kia's consumption ranges from 14.9 to 16.2 kWh/100km, ensuring fewer stops at the charging station during long journeys.
When it comes to interior space, both vehicles accommodate up to five passengers comfortably. The Ford Puma provides a trunk capacity ranging from 456 to 523 liters, ideal for family excursions or adventurous road trips. Its compact dimensions, stretching up to 4226 mm in length, make it agile in urban landscapes.
The Kia EV3, slightly larger in stature at up to 4310 mm in length, offers a trunk space of 460 liters. Despite its size, the EV3's interior reflects Kia's commitment to spacious comfort and cutting-edge technology, ensuring a pleasurable driving experience for all occupants.
Both vehicles exemplify strides towards a sustainable automotive future. The Ford Puma, with its blend of traditional and electric engines, provides versatility for drivers who aren't ready to transition entirely to electric but desire environmental consciousness. It maintains a CO2 efficiency classification ranging from D to A, demonstrating responsible emissions management.
Conversely, the Kia EV3 is a frontrunner in zero-emissions driving, flaunting an A classification in CO2 efficiency with a clean emissions output of 0 g/km. It embodies the shift towards full-electric mobility, delivering on both ecological promise and driving pleasure.
Choosing between the Ford Puma and the Kia EV3 hinges on personal driving needs, environmental commitments, and the allure of future-forward technology. The Puma serves as a versatile option for those straddling the line between petrol and electric, while the EV3 champions a new era of fully electric vehicles. Regardless of choice, both SUVs demonstrate that the journey towards sustainable motoring is well underway.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma is noticeably cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Kia EV3 costs 30,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,934 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is moderately more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 14.9 kWh/100km for the Kia EV3. That’s a difference of about 1.9 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Kia EV3 offers visibly more range – reaching up to 605 km, about 188 km more than the Ford Puma.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Kia EV3 offers moderately more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Kia EV3 takes 7.5 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers very slightly more torque with 290 Nm compared to 283 Nm. That’s about 7 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is noticeably lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,800 kg. The difference is around 484 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Kia EV3 carries very slightly more – 470 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 1 kg.
The Ford Puma has only a minor advantage in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
The Kia EV3 arrives as a cheeky, practical electric compact that manages to feel both premium and playful, delivering crisp handling and a roomy cabin that's perfect for urban life. With smart tech, friendly styling and sensible pricing, the EV3 is the kind of car that makes switching to electric feel like a no-brainer without asking you to give anything important up.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
30,800 - 41,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.2 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
436 - 605 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
58.3 - 81.4 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,800 - 1,885 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
460 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,300 - 4,310 mm
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,850 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,560 - 1,570 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,251 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
470 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
204 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.5 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
170 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
283 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
150 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Kia
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España