Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Kia EV3 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 204 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 30800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Kia EV3?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £ , while the Kia EV3 costs 30800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6077 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s somewhat more efficient than the Kia EV3 with 14.90 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.80 kWh.
As for electric range, the Kia EV3 performs distinct better – achieving up to 605 km, about 229 km more than the Ford Puma.
EV3
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Kia EV3 has a somewhat edge – offering 204 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Kia EV3 takes 7.50 s. That’s about 0.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs slightly better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Kia EV3 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 290 Nm compared to 283 Nm. That’s about 7 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is noticeable lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1800 kg. The difference is around 484 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers to a small extent more room – 523 L compared to 460 L. That’s a difference of about 63 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs minimal better – up to 1283 L, which is about 32 L more than the Kia EV3.
When it comes to payload, Kia EV3 hardly perceptible takes the win – 470 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 1 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Kia EV3 holds a very small edge in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Puma
Kia EV3
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £30,800
Kia EV3
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Kia EV3
4.9 (2 Reviews)
The Kia EV3 arrives as a cheeky, practical electric compact that manages to feel both premium and playful, delivering crisp handling and a roomy cabin that's perfect for urban life. With smart tech, friendly styling and sensible pricing, the EV3 is the kind of car that makes switching to electric feel like a no-brainer without asking you to give anything important up.
details
Ford Puma
Kia EV3
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
30800 - 41700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.2 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
436 - 605 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
58.3 - 81.4 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1800 - 1885 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
460 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4300 - 4310 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1850 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1560 - 1570 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1251 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
470 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
204 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.5 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
170 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
283 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
150 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Kia
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.