VS

Ford Puma vs Leapmotor T03 comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 95 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 16,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Leapmotor T03?

Ford Puma vs Leapmotor T03: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • markedly more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • substantially more trunk space
details

Leapmotor T03

  • clearly cheaper
  • moderately lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Leapmotor T03 is clearly cheaper – starting at 16,200 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,714 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is clearly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 16.3 kWh/100km for the Leapmotor T03. That’s a difference of about 3.3 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers markedly more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 152 km more than the Leapmotor T03.

T03

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers substantially more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 95 HP. That’s roughly 73 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Leapmotor T03 takes 12.7 s. That’s about 5.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers substantially more torque with 290 Nm compared to 158 Nm. That’s about 132 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Ford Puma offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Leapmotor T03 is moderately lighter – 1,175 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 141 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers substantially more boot space – 523 L compared to 210 L. That’s a difference of about 313 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries noticeably more – 469 kg compared to 300 kg. That’s a difference of about 169 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 404 - 417 km
Ford Puma
Leapmotor T03

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details

Leapmotor T03

Leapmotor T03 is a compact electric city car that blends bold styling with practical urban ease, making it an appealing choice for commuters who value smart tech and everyday affordability. It feels nimble in traffic and cleverly packaged inside, though it’s best suited to short urban trips rather than long highway journeys.

details
Ford Puma
Leapmotor T03

Costs and Consumption

Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
16,200 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
265 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
4
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,175 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
210 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,652 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
300 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
95 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
158 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
70 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Leapmotor
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.