Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Lynk & Co 02 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 30900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Lynk & Co 02?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Puma has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £ , while the Lynk & Co 02 costs 30900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6081 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s evident more efficient than the Lynk & Co 02 with 17.10 kWh. That’s a difference of about 4 kWh.
As for electric range, the Lynk & Co 02 performs to a small extent better – achieving up to 445 km, about 69 km more than the Ford Puma.
Puma
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Lynk & Co 02 has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 272 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 104 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lynk & Co 02 is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 5.50 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 1.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs to a small extent better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Lynk & Co 02 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Lynk & Co 02 pulls somewhat stronger with 323 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 33 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is convincingly lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1895 kg. The difference is around 579 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers distinct more room – 523 L compared to 410 L. That’s a difference of about 113 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Lynk & Co 02 performs barely noticeable better – up to 1349 L, which is about 66 L more than the Ford Puma.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma distinct takes the win – 469 kg compared to 375 kg. That’s a difference of about 94 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma has only a minor advantage in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Puma
Lynk & Co 02
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £24,800
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Lynk & Co 02
5 (1 Reviews)
The Lynk & Co 02 wears its attitude like a leather jacket—bold styling and a youthful cabin that punches above its class, appealing to buyers who want personality as well as practicality. It's a genuinely engaging compact with everyday usability, offering enough flair and refinement to stand out in a crowded market without trying too hard.
details
Ford Puma
Lynk & Co 02
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
30900 - 34300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.1 - 17.6 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
435 - 445 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1895 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
410 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4460 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1845 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1573 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1349 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
375 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
272 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.50 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
323 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
200 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Lynk & Co
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.