VS

Ford Puma vs Lynk & Co 02 comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 30,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Lynk & Co 02?

Ford Puma vs Lynk & Co 02: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • visibly more efficient
  • considerably lighter
details

Lynk & Co 02

4.8 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • very slightly more electric range
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Ford Puma is markedly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Lynk & Co 02 costs 30,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,938 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is visibly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 17.1 kWh/100km for the Lynk & Co 02. That’s a difference of about 4.1 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Lynk & Co 02 offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 445 km, about 28 km more than the Ford Puma.

02

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Lynk & Co 02 offers markedly more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 104 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lynk & Co 02 is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.5 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Lynk & Co 02 delivers somewhat more torque with 323 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 33 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is considerably lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,895 kg. The difference is around 579 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries noticeably more – 469 kg compared to 375 kg. That’s a difference of about 94 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Lynk & Co 02 is narrowly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,900
02

Lynk & Co 02

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 272 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.1 - 17.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 435 - 445 km
Ford Puma
Lynk & Co 02

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details

Lynk & Co 02

The Lynk & Co 02 wears its attitude like a leather jacket—bold styling and a youthful cabin that punches above its class, appealing to buyers who want personality as well as practicality. It's a genuinely engaging compact with everyday usability, offering enough flair and refinement to stand out in a crowded market without trying too hard.

details
Ford Puma
Lynk & Co 02

Costs and Consumption

Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
30,900 - 34,300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.1 - 17.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
435 - 445 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,895 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
410 L
Length
-
Length
4,460 mm
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,845 mm
Height
-
Height
1,573 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,349 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
375 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
323 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
200 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Lynk & Co
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.