Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Mazda 2 – Differences & prices compared
Two cars, one duel: Ford Puma meets Mazda 2.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mazda 2 has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 14200 £, while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £. That’s a price difference of around 10551 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda 2 manages with 4.70 L and is therefore somewhat more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.70 L per 100 km.
2
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a noticeable edge – offering 168 HP compared to 115 HP. That’s roughly 53 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Mazda 2 takes 9.10 s. That’s about 1.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Mazda 2 tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls clearly stronger with 290 Nm compared to 151 Nm. That’s about 139 Nm difference.
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Mazda 2 is slightly lighter – 1099 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 217 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers convincingly more room – 523 L compared to 280 L. That’s a difference of about 243 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs distinct better – up to 1283 L, which is about 333 L more than the Mazda 2.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma hardly perceptible takes the win – 469 kg compared to 437 kg. That’s a difference of about 32 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Ford Puma shows itself to be wins solidly and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £24,800
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Mazda 2
Toyota's compact and efficient Yaris has made quite a buzz in the automotive world with its sleek design and impressive fuel economy. Known for its reliability and affordability, the Yaris is a popular choice among city dwellers and young drivers who seek a practical yet stylish ride. Inside, the Yaris offers a surprisingly spacious interior with modern technology that caters to the everyday needs of its passengers.
details
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Ford Puma
Mazda 2
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
14200 - 21700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 5.4 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
107 - 122 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1099 - 1120 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
280 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4080 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1695 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1515 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
950 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
420 - 437 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
75 - 115 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 12.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
171 - 200 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
143 - 151 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
55 - 85 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1496 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2023
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.