VS

Ford Puma vs Mercedes CLE Convertible comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 472 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 53,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Mercedes CLE Convertible?

Ford Puma vs Mercedes CLE Convertible: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • significantly lighter
  • visibly more trunk space
details

Mercedes CLE Convertible

  • substantially more power
  • somewhat more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Puma is clearly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Mercedes CLE Convertible costs 53,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 29,294 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mercedes CLE Convertible uses 4.9 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.

CLE Convertible

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes CLE Convertible offers substantially more power – delivering 472 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 304 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes CLE Convertible is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.4 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes CLE Convertible delivers clearly more torque with 560 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 270 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Ford Puma offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is significantly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,925 kg. The difference is around 609 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers visibly more boot space – 523 L compared to 385 L. That’s a difference of about 138 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries only slightly more – 469 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 34 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes CLE Convertible stands out in the key areas in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £53,200
CLE Convertible

Mercedes CLE Convertible

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 193 - 472 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.9 - 9.6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Kia EV2
VS
The Ford Puma and Kia EV2 represent two different approaches in the compact crossover class: the Puma delivers engaging handling, practical packaging and petrol/hybrid options, while the EV2 is a clean-sheet electric aimed at low running costs, range and modern tech. Choose the Puma if driving …
Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
Ford Puma
Mercedes CLE Convertible

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mercedes CLE Convertible

The Mercedes CLE Convertible drops its roof with the kind of poise you'd expect from a luxury cruiser, wrapping elegant lines and a plush cabin into a composition that's equally at home on coastal roads or city boulevards. Behind the wheel it balances comfort and sporty intent, making it an appealing pick for buyers who want a refined open-top experience without shouting for attention — and yes, it even makes the commute feel like a weekend escape.

details
serpimg_kbTtw5

Reviews Mercedes CLE Convertible

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
Ford Puma
Skoda Epiq
VS
Ford Puma vs Skoda Epiq is a matchup between a compact, city-oriented crossover and a more conventional Skoda SUV offering (marketed here as the Epiq). This comparison focuses on what matters to real buyers: space, practicality, driving feel, running costs and which car suits which type of …
Ford Puma
Kia XCeed
VS
The Ford Puma and Kia XCeed are two of the sharper compact crossovers on the market, each mixing car-like driving manners with useful everyday practicality. This comparison looks at driving dynamics, interior quality, space and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your lifestyle.
BMW 4 Series Convertible
Mercedes CLE Convertible
VS
The BMW 4 Series Convertible and the Mercedes CLE Convertible go head-to-head as premium drop-top coupes, with the BMW known for taut, driver-focused handling and the CLE leaning into comfort, style, and advanced tech. Choose the 4 Series for a sharper, more engaging drive; opt for the CLE if you …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Bayon
VS
Ford Puma and Hyundai Bayon are compact crossover rivals that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling and efficient engines. This quick comparison highlights how they differ in driving feel, cabin practicality, equipment and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your daily needs.
Ford Puma
Opel Astra
VS
Choosing between the Ford Puma and the Vauxhall Astra comes down to whether you want a compact crossover with a sporty, raised stance or a more conventional family hatch with roomy practicality. The Puma brings a higher driving position and clever cargo solutions, while the Astra focuses on space, …
Ford Puma
Nissan Micra
VS
The Ford Puma and Nissan Micra both aim at city-minded drivers but take different paths: the Puma is a compact crossover that prioritises space, ride comfort and practicality, while the Micra is a small hatchback built around affordability, simplicity and easy urban manoeuvring. Choose the Puma if …
Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …
Ford Puma
Mercedes CLE Convertible

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
53,200 - 109,200 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 9.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
128 - 218 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
66 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Convertible
Seats
5
Seats
4
Doors
-
Doors
2
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,925 - 2,110 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
375 - 385 L
Length
-
Length
4,850 - 4,853 mm
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,861 mm
Height
-
Height
1,424 - 1,435 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
380 - 435 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
193 - 472 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 9.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
220 - 250 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
250 - 560 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
142 - 347 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1,993 - 2,999 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, E, F, D
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
What drivetrain options does the Ford Puma have?

The Ford Puma is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.