Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Mercedes EQE SUV comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 625 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 71,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Mercedes EQE SUV?
Ford Puma vs Mercedes EQE SUV: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma is considerably cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Mercedes EQE SUV costs 71,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 47,639 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is clearly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 18.3 kWh/100km for the Mercedes EQE SUV. That’s a difference of about 5.3 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes EQE SUV offers clearly more range – reaching up to 611 km, about 194 km more than the Ford Puma.
EQE SUV
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQE SUV offers significantly more power – delivering 625 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 457 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQE SUV is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.7 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 3.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQE SUV delivers substantially more torque with 950 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 660 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is considerably lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,440 kg. The difference is around 1,124 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers barely more boot space – 523 L compared to 520 L. That’s a difference of about 3 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQE SUV carries slightly more – 580 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 111 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mercedes EQE SUV comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £71,600
Mercedes EQE SUV
Ford Puma
Mercedes EQE SUV
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Mercedes EQE SUV
The Mercedes EQE SUV wraps silent electric power in a sumptuous, tech-filled shell, offering a cocoon-like cabin that makes long journeys feel indulgent. It’s not a driver's toy but a sophisticated cruiser for buyers who want luxury, space and futuristic gadgetry without shouting for attention.
details
Ford Puma
Mercedes EQE SUV
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
71,600 - 125,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 - 23.1 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
453 - 611 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
90.5 - 96 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
2,440 - 2,615 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
520 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,863 - 4,879 mm
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,940 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,672 - 1,685 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,675 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
505 - 580 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
265 - 625 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.7 - 7.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
210 - 240 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
550 - 950 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
195 - 460 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.