Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Toyota C-HR - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 223 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 29100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Toyota C-HR?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Puma has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £ , while the Toyota C-HR costs 29100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4363 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Toyota C-HR manages with 0.80 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 4.60 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma performs decisively better – achieving up to 376 km, about 308 km more than the Toyota C-HR.
C-HR
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR has a noticeable edge – offering 223 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.
Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 7.40 s from 0 to 100 km/h.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs to a small extent better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Toyota C-HR tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is to a small extent lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1505 kg. The difference is around 189 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers to a small extent more room – 523 L compared to 447 L. That’s a difference of about 76 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs slight better – up to 1283 L, which is about 128 L more than the Toyota C-HR.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma barely noticeable takes the win – 469 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 44 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Toyota C-HR is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Puma
Toyota C-HR
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £29,100
Toyota C-HR
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Toyota C-HR
5 (1 Reviews)
The Toyota C-HR cuts a striking figure with its angular styling and coupe-like profile, so you’ll never go unnoticed in the supermarket car park. It balances everyday practicality with a nimble, city-friendly personality, making routine commutes feel a touch more fun without asking for forgiveness.
details
Ford Puma
Toyota C-HR
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
29100 - 42800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.8 - 5.1 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
17 - 115 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
43 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1505 - 1755 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4362 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1832 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1558 - 1564 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1076 - 1155 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
375 - 425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
175 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1798 - 1987 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.