@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

@ Toyota Motor Corporation

Ford Puma vs Toyota C-HR – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Q: What is the maximum horsepower of the Ford Puma?

Up to 168 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

Q: What is the fuel consumption of the Ford Puma according to the manufacturer?

On average, the Ford Puma consumes 5.40 L.

Q: How much electricity does the Ford Puma use per 100 km?

According to the manufacturer, the Ford Puma requires 13.10 kWh.

Q: What is the Ford Puma’s maximum WLTP range?

The WLTP range is up to 376 km.

Q: What is the battery capacity of the Ford Puma?

The Ford Puma comes with a 43 kWh battery.

Q: What is the top speed of the Ford Puma?

The Ford Puma reaches up to 210 km/h.

Q: What are the Ford Puma’s length, width and height?

Overall, the Ford Puma is 4214 mm long, 1805 mm wide and 1555 mm high.

Q: What drivetrain options does the Toyota C-HR have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

Q: How powerful is the Toyota C-HR's engine?

The Toyota C-HR reaches a peak output of 223 HP, depending on the model.

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Ford Puma or Toyota C-HR fits your lifestyle better.

scroll down

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

The Battle of Compact SUVs: Ford Puma vs Toyota C-HR

The automotive industry is buzzing with compact SUVs that offer a blend of urban functionality and the adventurous spirit of larger SUVs. Two models stand out in this segment: the Ford Puma and the Toyota C-HR. While both vehicles fall under the SUV category, they appeal to different types of drivers with their technical specifications and design choices.

C-HR @ Toyota Motor Corporation

Performance and Powertrain

The Ford Puma comes equipped with a range of petrol mild-hybrid electric vehicle (MHEV) and electric options. Its power output varies from 125 HP to 168 HP, with diverse engine options catering to different driving preferences. The Puma promises efficient fuel consumption, ranging between 5.4 to 6 L/100km, and an electric option using 13.1 to 13.7 kWh/100km. The Puma's electric variant offers an impressive range of up to 376 km, powered by a 43 kWh battery.

On the other hand, the Toyota C-HR offers both full hybrid and plug-in hybrid variants, providing power outputs of 140 HP to 223 HP. Its fuel efficiency is notable, especially the plug-in hybrid, which consumes just 0.8 L/100km. The electric range of the C-HR's plug-in version reaches up to 68 km, perfectly suited for urban commutes.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Transmission and Drive

The Ford Puma offers both manual and automatic transmissions, with transmission details ranging from a 6-speed manual gearbox to a dual-clutch automatic and reduction gearbox in the EV variant. The drive type is consistent with front-wheel drive across the range, ensuring simplicity and efficiency.

In contrast, the Toyota C-HR relies on a continuously variable transmission (CVT) for smoother gear shifts. It also offers flexibility with both front-wheel and all-wheel drive options, catering to various driving conditions and customer preferences.

scroll down

C-HR @ Toyota Motor Corporation

Design and Dimensions

Measuring between 4186 and 4226 mm in length, the Ford Puma marries a sporty design with a practical SUV build. With a width of 1805 mm and a height near 1550 mm, it provides a balanced profile that emphasizes agility and ease of parking in urban settings. Engineered with a lightweight structure, it has a curb weight ranging from 1316 to 1563 kg.

The Toyota C-HR projects a more robust stance with a length of 4362 mm, width of 1832 mm, and height ranging from 1558 to 1564 mm. Its curb weight spans from 1505 to 1755 kg. The C-HR offers a dynamic design with sharp lines, catering to those who seek both aesthetics and functionality.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Interior Comfort and Cargo Space

Both the Puma and C-HR are equipped to accommodate five passengers comfortably. The Ford Puma gains an edge in trunk capacity, offering between 456 to 523 liters, making it ideal for those in need of extra cargo space for travel or outdoor activities.

The Toyota C-HR provides a trunk capacity of 350 to 447 liters, which, although less than the Puma, is still sufficient for everyday use and weekend adventures. The interior of the C-HR is designed to feel spacious and airy, ensuring comfort over longer drives.

C-HR @ Toyota Motor Corporation

Environmental Considerations

From an environmental perspective, both models make significant strides. The Puma's CO2 emissions range from 0 g/km for the electric variant to up to 136 g/km for petrol engines. The C-HR, equipped with hybrid technology, manages to keep emissions remarkably low, with the plug-in version at just 19 g/km of CO2.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Conclusion: Choosing Your Compact SUV

In the head-to-head comparison between the Ford Puma and Toyota C-HR, each model brings its strengths to the table. The Puma's flexible engine options and sporty design make it an appealing choice for those who appreciate performance and style. On the other hand, the C-HR's hybrid technology and design appeal might draw in drivers committed to sustainability and modern aesthetics. Ultimately, the choice hinges on personal preference: whether you prioritize cutting-edge hybrid technology or a dynamic driving experience, both vehicles represent the best in class for compact SUVs.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

C-HR @ Toyota Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Ford Puma has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the Toyota C-HR costs 29100 £. That’s a price difference of around 4363 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Toyota C-HR manages with 0.80 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 4.60 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Ford Puma performs decisively better – achieving up to 376 km, about 308 km more than the Toyota C-HR.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR has a noticeable edge – offering 223 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.

Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 7.40 s from 0 to 100 km/h.

In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs to a small extent better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Toyota C-HR tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.

scroll down

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is to a small extent lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1505 kg. The difference is around 189 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers to a small extent more room – 523 L compared to 447 L. That’s a difference of about 76 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs slight better – up to 1283 L, which is about 128 L more than the Toyota C-HR.

When it comes to payload, Ford Puma barely noticeable takes the win – 469 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 44 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Toyota C-HR proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Toyota C-HR is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £29,100

@ Toyota Motor Corporation

Toyota C-HR

Price : 29100 - 42800 £
Body Type : SUV
Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission : Automatic
Transmission Detail : CVT
Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP : 140 - 223 HP
Consumption L/100km : 0.8 - 5.1 L
Electric Range : 68 km
Seats : 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h : 7.4 - 9.9 s
Model Year : 2024 - 2025
Max Speed : 175 - 180 km/h
Number of Cylinders : 4
Doors : 5
Model : C-HR
Modell : C-HR 1.8 Hybrid, C-HR 2.0 Plug-In Hybrid, C-HR 2.0 Hybrid
CO2 Efficiency Class : C, B
Trim Level : Business Edition, Flow, GR SPORT AWD-i, Lounge, GR SPORT, Teamplayer, GR SPORT Edition AWD-i, Lounge Edition, GR SPORT Edition
Power kW : 103 - 164 kW
co2 : 17 - 115 g/km
Engine capacity : 1798 - 1987 cm3
Curb weight : 1505 - 1755 kg
Fuel tank capacity : 43 L
Trunk capacity : 350 - 447 L
Length : 4362 mm
Width : 1832 mm
Height : 1558 - 1564 mm
Brand : Toyota
Max trunk capacity : 1076 - 1155 L
Payload : 375 - 425 kg

details

Ford Puma

5 (1)

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Toyota C-HR

5 (1)

The Toyota C-HR cuts a striking figure with its angular styling and coupe-like profile, so you’ll never go unnoticed in the supermarket car park. It balances everyday practicality with a nimble, city-friendly personality, making routine commutes feel a touch more fun without asking for forgiveness.

details

@ Toyota Motor Corporation

@ Toyota Motor Corporation

@ Toyota Motor Corporation

@ Toyota Motor Corporation

@ Toyota Motor Corporation

Top Car Comparisons

@ Toyota Motor Corporation

Toyota C-HR

@ Toyota Motor Corporation

Toyota Yaris Cross

In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its …

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Puma

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

VW ID.3

If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …

Ford Puma

Toyota C-HR

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center	@ Toyota Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price 24800 - 36300 £	Price 29100 - 42800 £
Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L	Consumption L/100km 0.8 - 5.1 L
Consumption kWh/100km 13.1 - 13.9 kWh	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 361 - 376 km	Electric Range 68 km
Battery Capacity 43 kWh	Battery Capacity -
co2 0 - 135 g/km	co2 17 - 115 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 42 L	Fuel tank capacity 43 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1316 - 1563 kg	Curb weight 1505 - 1755 kg
Trunk capacity 456 - 523 L	Trunk capacity 350 - 447 L
Length 4186 - 4226 mm	Length 4362 mm
Width 1805 mm	Width 1832 mm
Height 1550 - 1555 mm	Height 1558 - 1564 mm
Max trunk capacity 1216 - 1283 L	Max trunk capacity 1076 - 1155 L
Payload 367 - 469 kg	Payload 375 - 425 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Electric, Petrol MHEV	Engine Type Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission Automatic, Manuel	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail CVT
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 125 - 168 HP	Power HP 140 - 223 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.4 - 9.8 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.4 - 9.9 s
Max Speed 160 - 210 km/h	Max Speed 175 - 180 km/h
Torque 170 - 290 Nm	Torque -
Number of Cylinders 3	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 92 - 124 kW	Power kW 103 - 164 kW
Engine capacity 999 cm3	Engine capacity 1798 - 1987 cm3