VS

Ford Puma vs Toyota C-HR comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 223 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Toyota C-HR?

Ford Puma vs Toyota C-HR: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • significantly more electric range
  • a bit lighter
  • a bit more trunk space
details

Toyota C-HR

4.8 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • considerably more efficient
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Puma

Ford Puma VS Toyota C-HR — which compact crossover suits your day-to-day?

Ford Puma VS Toyota C-HR puts a playfully sporty small-SUV against a design-forward, efficient hybrid. The Ford Puma leans into engagement and clever load-lugging, while the Toyota C-HR emphasises low running costs and a more polished cabin feel. Choosing between them is a trade-off: the Puma promises a more involving drive and clever boot tricks, the C-HR rewards city commuters and duty‑car buyers with calm economy and a refined interior. Below we break down how those headline differences actually matter in daily use.

C-HR

Character and driving feel

The Ford Puma drives like a lifted small hatch—sharp steering, eager turn-in and a sense that the chassis wants to play, which makes everyday corners feel more rewarding. The Toyota C-HR takes the opposite stance: composed, neutral and engineered to mask fuss, so the reward is relaxed progress rather than thrills. Engine character emphasises the split—Puma's smaller petrol unit can sound busy when worked, and its dual‑clutch can feel hesitant in stop‑start traffic, whereas the C-HR's hybrid setup gives smooth, low‑effort pullaways but can sound strained under heavy acceleration. If you crave involvement the Puma delivers; if you prefer calm consistency the C-HR is the quieter companion.

Puma

Comfort and cabin feel

Inside, the Toyota C-HR generally feels the more mature package with slightly better materials and a layout that keeps the basics—like climate controls—easy to operate without diving into menus. The Ford Puma's cabin is modern and sporty, with supportive front seats and a firmer suspension bias that can be great for spirited drives but transmits sharper bumps on coarse surfaces. Rear seats in both cars are snug, yet they feel different: the Puma's rear is brighter and a touch tighter for tall passengers, while the C-HR's sloping roofline makes the back feel darker and more enclosed. If haptic simplicity and perceived quality matter most, the C-HR nudges ahead; if driver seat comfort and a sportier cockpit are priorities, the Puma scores points.

C-HR

Practicality and everyday usability

The Ford Puma wins this round on usable luggage space thanks to a clever lower bay that accepts muddy boots or wet kit and a broad, easy opening that makes loading less of a chore. The Toyota C-HR sacrifices some of that practicality for its sleek silhouette: the boot is smaller, often awkwardly shaped with a high lip, and plug‑in versions lose even more usable room. Inside, both cars hide compromises—rear legroom is not class‑leading in either—but the Puma's flexible load area translates into noticeably better real‑world usability for weekend gear or grocery runs. So for hands-on practicality pick the Puma; for style‑first city life accept the C-HR's trade‑offs.

Puma

City friendliness versus motorway behaviour

In tight urban environments the C-HR shines with its hybrid creep and near‑silent electric operation at low speeds, making traffic and short trips effortless and economical. The Puma is no slouch in town—its compact footprint and agile steering make it simple to place—but its gearbox and engine note can be less composed at low speeds. On the motorway the contrast switches: the Puma feels planted and engaging over long distances, keeping driver interest without being harsh, while the C-HR offers a calmer, more frugal cruise but will betray itself with driveline noise if you press hard to overtake. In short, the C-HR is the better city commuter and economy specialist, the Puma the more involving all‑rounder on A‑roads and motorways.

C-HR

Buyer fit — who should choose which car next?

Pick the Ford Puma if you want a compact crossover that behaves like a fun hatch with genuinely useful storage tricks and a cockpit that rewards an active driving style; it's aimed at buyers who value engagement and day‑to‑day practicality. Opt for the Toyota C-HR if your priorities are quiet economy, a more refined interior presence and the tax or efficiency advantages that come with hybrid or plug‑in options—ideal for commuters and style‑minded couples. Both cars make concessions in rear space and rear visibility, but the nature of those compromises differs and will decide your satisfaction more than headline specs. The technical comparison that follows will unpack the measurable differences so you can match those trade‑offs to your exact needs.

Frequently compared as well

Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Choosing between the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross comes down to whether you prefer the C-HR’s sharper styling and firmer, more engaging ride or the Yaris Cross’s roomier practicality and better efficiency. I’ll compare their driving feel, interior comfort, fuel economy, and features to …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Corolla
VS
Choosing between the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Corolla comes down to whether you want a compact crossover's higher driving position and distinctive styling or a traditional compact car's practicality and efficiency. The C-HR emphasizes bold looks and a more SUV-like feel, while the Corolla …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Ford Puma is noticeably cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Toyota C-HR costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,220 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota C-HR uses 2.3 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 3.1 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers significantly more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 351 km more than the Toyota C-HR.

C-HR

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR offers clearly more power – delivering 223 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.

Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 7.4 s from 0 to 100 km/h.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is a bit lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,505 kg. The difference is around 189 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers a bit more boot space – 523 L compared to 447 L. That’s a difference of about 76 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries very slightly more – 469 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 44 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota C-HR has only a minor advantage in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £29,100
C-HR

Toyota C-HR

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 140 - 223 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
  • Electric Range 66 km
details
Ford Puma
Toyota C-HR

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Toyota C-HR

The Toyota C-HR is a bold, coupe-styled crossover that grabs attention with angular lines and a modern interior design. It’s aimed at comfortable urban driving and sensible efficiency, offering practical features and distinctive looks rather than rugged off-road ability.

details
64380-c-hr-grey-2020-25-web-lr
64412-c-hr-grey-2020-41-web-lr
64421-c-hr-grey-2020-32-web-lr
64409-c-hr-grey-2020-37-web-lr
64403-c-hr-grey-2020-52-web-lr

Reviews Toyota C-HR

4.8 (8 Reviews)
rate
Jan
16 May 2026, 20:51:01

Great driving comfort, admittedly short trips, but above all a cool impression.

Rav is for wimps.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Sam baba
25 Apr 2026, 21:54:02

Reliability and no maintenance costs, plus a futuristic design.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …
Lexus UX
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Lexus UX and Toyota C-HR are compact crossovers aimed at urban buyers who want agile packaging and distinctive style. The UX leans on Lexus-level refinement and a premium cabin, while the C-HR emphasizes bolder styling and strong value for money.
Omoda 5
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Omoda 5 brings bold, modern styling and a tech-forward package, while the Toyota C‑HR emphasizes distinctive design, proven reliability and a refined hybrid powertrain. This comparison covers practicality, driving character, equipment and running costs to help you decide which compact crossover …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Deciding between the Toyota C‑HR and the C‑HR+ is about whether you prefer the C‑HR’s balanced efficiency and bold styling or the C‑HR+’s higher trim level with extra equipment and refinement. I’ll compare performance, comfort, features and running costs to help you pick the one that best matches …
Ford Puma
Kia EV2
VS
The Ford Puma and Kia EV2 represent two different approaches in the compact crossover class: the Puma delivers engaging handling, practical packaging and petrol/hybrid options, while the EV2 is a clean-sheet electric aimed at low running costs, range and modern tech. Choose the Puma if driving …
Lexus LBX
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Lexus LBX and Toyota C-HR are compact crossovers with similar footprints but aimed at different buyers. The LBX prioritizes premium materials, a quieter ride and upscale features, while the C-HR emphasizes bold styling, engaging handling and stronger value for money.
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Ford Puma
Toyota C-HR

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
29,100 - 42,800 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
66 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
52 - 116 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,505 - 1,755 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,832 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
375 - 425 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1,798 - 1,987 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Toyota
What drivetrain options does the Ford Puma have?

The Ford Puma is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.