Compare performance (168 HP vs 223 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Toyota C-HR?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The automotive industry is buzzing with compact SUVs that offer a blend of urban functionality and the adventurous spirit of larger SUVs. Two models stand out in this segment: the Ford Puma and the Toyota C-HR. While both vehicles fall under the SUV category, they appeal to different types of drivers with their technical specifications and design choices.
The Ford Puma comes equipped with a range of petrol mild-hybrid electric vehicle (MHEV) and electric options. Its power output varies from 125 HP to 168 HP, with diverse engine options catering to different driving preferences. The Puma promises efficient fuel consumption, ranging between 5.4 to 6 L/100km, and an electric option using 13.1 to 13.7 kWh/100km. The Puma's electric variant offers an impressive range of up to 376 km, powered by a 43 kWh battery.
On the other hand, the Toyota C-HR offers both full hybrid and plug-in hybrid variants, providing power outputs of 140 HP to 223 HP. Its fuel efficiency is notable, especially the plug-in hybrid, which consumes just 0.8 L/100km. The electric range of the C-HR's plug-in version reaches up to 68 km, perfectly suited for urban commutes.
The Ford Puma offers both manual and automatic transmissions, with transmission details ranging from a 6-speed manual gearbox to a dual-clutch automatic and reduction gearbox in the EV variant. The drive type is consistent with front-wheel drive across the range, ensuring simplicity and efficiency.
In contrast, the Toyota C-HR relies on a continuously variable transmission (CVT) for smoother gear shifts. It also offers flexibility with both front-wheel and all-wheel drive options, catering to various driving conditions and customer preferences.
Measuring between 4186 and 4226 mm in length, the Ford Puma marries a sporty design with a practical SUV build. With a width of 1805 mm and a height near 1550 mm, it provides a balanced profile that emphasizes agility and ease of parking in urban settings. Engineered with a lightweight structure, it has a curb weight ranging from 1316 to 1563 kg.
The Toyota C-HR projects a more robust stance with a length of 4362 mm, width of 1832 mm, and height ranging from 1558 to 1564 mm. Its curb weight spans from 1505 to 1755 kg. The C-HR offers a dynamic design with sharp lines, catering to those who seek both aesthetics and functionality.
Both the Puma and C-HR are equipped to accommodate five passengers comfortably. The Ford Puma gains an edge in trunk capacity, offering between 456 to 523 liters, making it ideal for those in need of extra cargo space for travel or outdoor activities.
The Toyota C-HR provides a trunk capacity of 350 to 447 liters, which, although less than the Puma, is still sufficient for everyday use and weekend adventures. The interior of the C-HR is designed to feel spacious and airy, ensuring comfort over longer drives.
From an environmental perspective, both models make significant strides. The Puma's CO2 emissions range from 0 g/km for the electric variant to up to 136 g/km for petrol engines. The C-HR, equipped with hybrid technology, manages to keep emissions remarkably low, with the plug-in version at just 19 g/km of CO2.
In the head-to-head comparison between the Ford Puma and Toyota C-HR, each model brings its strengths to the table. The Puma's flexible engine options and sporty design make it an appealing choice for those who appreciate performance and style. On the other hand, the C-HR's hybrid technology and design appeal might draw in drivers committed to sustainability and modern aesthetics. Ultimately, the choice hinges on personal preference: whether you prioritize cutting-edge hybrid technology or a dynamic driving experience, both vehicles represent the best in class for compact SUVs.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma is noticeably cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Toyota C-HR costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,220 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota C-HR uses 2.3 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 3.1 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers significantly more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 351 km more than the Toyota C-HR.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR offers clearly more power – delivering 223 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.
Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 7.4 s from 0 to 100 km/h.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is a bit lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,505 kg. The difference is around 189 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries very slightly more – 469 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 44 kg.
The Toyota C-HR is slightly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
The Toyota C-HR is a bold, coupe-styled crossover that grabs attention with angular lines and a modern interior design. It’s aimed at comfortable urban driving and sensible efficiency, offering practical features and distinctive looks rather than rugged off-road ability.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
29,100 - 42,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
66 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
52 - 116 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,505 - 1,755 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,832 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
375 - 425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,798 - 1,987 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España