VS

Ford Puma vs MG HS/EHS – Which model is better for everyday use?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or MG HS/EHS?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma @ puma.fordpresskits.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

MG HS/EHS has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24000 £, while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £. That’s a price difference of around 780 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: MG HS/EHS manages with 0.50 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 4.90 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Ford Puma performs clearly better – achieving up to 376 km, about 276 km more than the MG HS/EHS.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MG HS/EHS has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 272 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 104 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG HS/EHS is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 6.80 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 0.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs slight better – reaching 210 km/h, while the MG HS/EHS tops out at 195 km/h. The difference is around 15 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: MG HS/EHS pulls to a small extent stronger with 350 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is noticeable lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1625 kg. The difference is around 309 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers minimal more room – 523 L compared to 507 L. That’s a difference of about 16 L.

In maximum load capacity, the MG HS/EHS performs to a small extent better – up to 1484 L, which is about 201 L more than the Ford Puma.

When it comes to payload, Ford Puma somewhat takes the win – 469 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 69 kg.

Who wins the race?

The MG HS/EHS proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
MG HS/EHS is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £24,000

MG HS/EHS

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 170 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.5 - 7.6 L
  • Electric Range : 100 km
details

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma presents itself as a stylish compact SUV with a distinctive design that combines practicality with a dynamic driving experience. Its sleek lines and sporty aesthetics make it stand out on the road, while the interior offers a comfortable and tech-savvy environment. With an emphasis on efficiency and a smooth drive, the Ford Puma is well-suited for both urban commutes and countryside adventures.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29 @ puma.fordpresskits.com

MG HS/EHS

5 (1)
rate

The MG HS, also known as the EHS in its hybrid variant, is a midsize SUV that combines modern design with a focus on comfort and technology. Its spacious interior offers a premium feel, enhanced by quality materials and an array of advanced features aimed at ensuring a smooth driving experience. Known for its efficiency, the MG HS/EHS delivers an enjoyable ride whether navigating city streets or taking on longer road trips.

details

Reviews MG HS/EHS

Mac Finn 29 Oct 2025, 11:27:52

Good perfomance and superbly low fuel consumption in daily use.

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday practicality, the ID.3 for smooth, emissions-free cruising and lower running costs — your wallet and the planet will thank you differently.
Ford Puma
MG MG4
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered compact crossover that feels taut and practical — with Ford's lively chassis, a roomy MegaBox boot and mild‑hybrid frugality — the Puma is the small SUV to live with. But if you're ready to go electric without blowing the budget, the MG4 serves up surprising range, a spacious interior and brilliant value, making it the smarter, cleaner pick for everyday running.
Ford Puma
MG HS/EHS
Puma

Costs and Consumption
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
24000 - 36000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 7.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
100 km
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
14 - 173 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1625 - 1930 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
441 - 507 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
4655 - 4670 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1890 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1663 - 1664 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
1291 - 1484 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
400 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
170 - 272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 9.6 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
190 - 195 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
275 - 350 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
125 - 200 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1496 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B, D
Brand
Ford
Brand
MG

Similar Comparisons

MG HS/EHS
MG MGS5 EV
VS
Think of the MG HS (and its EHS plug‑in hybrid) as the sensible, budget‑friendly family SUV — roomy, comfortable and annoyingly practical — while the MG MGS5 EV flips the script with instant electric torque, sharper handling and far more tech for your money. Pick the HS/EHS if you want proven value and easy refuelling; choose the MGS5 EV if you crave silent performance, lower running costs and can live with charging.
Ford Puma
Vauxhall Corsa
VS
In the highly competitive compact car segment, the Ford Puma stands out with its robust styling and dynamic driving performance, offering a sporty edge perfect for city and country roads alike. In contrast, the Vauxhall Corsa impresses with its practical design and tech-forward interior, appealing to those who prioritize efficiency and comfort in a more streamlined package. Ultimately, the choice between the Puma and Corsa hinges on whether your preference leans towards spirited driving or urban practicality.
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma and the Renault 5 both offer unique appeals in the compact car segment. The Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and dynamic driving experience, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a blend of style and performance. In contrast, the Renault 5 charms with its iconic retro design and efficient urban mobility, making it a beloved choice for city drivers who appreciate a touch of nostalgia with modern functionality.
Ford Puma
Vauxhall Frontera
VS
In the latest showdown between the Ford Puma and Opel Frontera, performance enthusiasts will find the Puma's sleek design and nimble handling a stark contrast to the Frontera's rugged off-road capabilities. While the Puma excels in urban agility and fuel efficiency, the Frontera stands out for its durability and versatility in challenging terrains. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on personal lifestyle needs, with the Puma appealing more to city drivers and the Frontera capturing the spirit of adventure seekers.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its premium interior and refined performance, appealing to buyers looking for a more upscale experience in this class.
Ford Puma
VW T-Cross
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Ford Puma showcases a sporty design and dynamic handling, appealing to those who crave a fun driving experience. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross emphasizes practicality and interior space, making it a top choice for families seeking comfort on the road. Both vehicles offer impressive tech features, but their differing approaches to style and functionality make this comparison a compelling one for potential buyers.
Alfa Romeo Junior
Ford Puma
VS
The Alfa Romeo Junior offers a stylish blend of Italian design and spirited performance, appealing to enthusiasts looking for a dynamic driving experience. In contrast, the Ford Puma impresses with its practicality and advanced technology features, making it a versatile choice for everyday use. While the Junior captivates with its heritage and sportiness, the Puma excels in comfort and reliability, catering to different segments of the market.
Ford Focus
Ford Puma
VS
In the realm of compact vehicles, the Ford Focus and Ford Puma present two compelling choices, each with its own unique appeal. The Focus is celebrated for its spacious interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it an ideal option for families and enthusiasts alike. On the other hand, the Puma stands out with its stylish design and versatility, offering a sportier feel while maintaining practicality for everyday use.
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.