Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Mitsubishi Outlander comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 306 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Mitsubishi Outlander?
Ford Puma vs Mitsubishi Outlander: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma is considerably cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Mitsubishi Outlander costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,934 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Outlander uses 2.6 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.8 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers substantially more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 332 km more than the Mitsubishi Outlander.
Outlander
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi Outlander offers substantially more power – delivering 306 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 138 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Mitsubishi Outlander takes 7.9 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,156 kg. The difference is around 840 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers marginally more boot space – 523 L compared to 498 L. That’s a difference of about 25 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mitsubishi Outlander carries moderately more – 529 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 60 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma stands out in the key areas in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Mitsubishi Outlander
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Mitsubishi Outlander
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a sensible family SUV that blends roomy practicality with a calm, assured ride—ideal for school runs and weekend getaways. It won’t set pulses racing, but its tidy interior, straightforward equipment and low-stress ownership make it a smart, unfussy pick for buyers who prefer reliability over flash.
details
Ford Puma
Mitsubishi Outlander
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
42,800 - 54,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 2.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
83 - 85 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
60 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
2,156 - 2,232 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
498 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,862 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
453 - 529 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
-
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
306 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
225 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,360 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.