Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs NIO EL7 comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 653 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 63,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or NIO EL7?
Ford Puma vs NIO EL7: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma is considerably cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the NIO EL7 costs 63,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 39,428 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is significantly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 22.1 kWh/100km for the NIO EL7. That’s a difference of about 9.1 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the NIO EL7 offers a bit more range – reaching up to 501 km, about 84 km more than the Ford Puma.
EL7
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the NIO EL7 offers clearly more power – delivering 653 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 485 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the NIO EL7 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 3.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the NIO EL7 delivers significantly more torque with 850 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 560 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is substantially lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,421 kg. The difference is around 1,105 kg.
Looking at boot space, the NIO EL7 offers very slightly more boot space – 570 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 47 L.
Maximum payload is identical – both can carry up to 469 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The NIO EL7 sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £63,300
NIO EL7
Ford Puma
NIO EL7
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
NIO EL7
The NIO EL7 arrives as a roomy electric SUV that pairs restrained elegance with bold design cues, and its interior feels like a calm, tech-forward lounge rather than a gadget parade. For buyers who crave effortless cruising, spirited performance and a tastefully premium experience — with just the right amount of showmanship for the driveway — the EL7 is an enticing, slightly theatrical choice.
details
Ford Puma
NIO EL7
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
63,300 - 81,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
22.1 - 22.4 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
384 - 501 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
73.5 - 90 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
2,421 - 2,441 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,912 mm
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,987 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,720 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,545 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
449 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
653 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
850 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
480 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2023
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
NIO
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.