Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs NIO ET5 Wagon comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 490 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 40,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or NIO ET5 Wagon?
Ford Puma vs NIO ET5 Wagon: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma is substantially cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the NIO ET5 Wagon costs 40,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,800 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is clearly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 19.3 kWh/100km for the NIO ET5 Wagon. That’s a difference of about 6.3 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the NIO ET5 Wagon offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 560 km, about 143 km more than the Ford Puma.
ET5 Wagon
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the NIO ET5 Wagon offers considerably more power – delivering 490 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 322 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the NIO ET5 Wagon is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 3.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the NIO ET5 Wagon delivers significantly more torque with 700 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 410 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,265 kg. The difference is around 949 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries very slightly more – 469 kg compared to 465 kg. That’s a difference of about 4 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The NIO ET5 Wagon is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £40,700
NIO ET5 Wagon
Ford Puma
NIO ET5 Wagon
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
NIO ET5 Wagon
The NIO ET5 Wagon blends sleek fastback styling with the sensible practicality of a wagon, delivering a premium-feeling cabin and clever cargo space that keeps life neatly packed. For buyers who want electric refinement without sacrificing family-hauler utility, the ET5 Wagon offers quiet, eager performance and smart packaging that makes weekend escapes and daily commutes equally enjoyable — yes, even with the dog and the golf clubs.
details
Ford Puma
NIO ET5 Wagon
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
40,700 - 58,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.3 - 19.8 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
435 - 560 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
73.5 - 90 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
2,265 - 2,285 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
450 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,790 mm
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,960 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,499 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,300 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
445 - 465 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
490 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
700 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
360 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2023
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
NIO
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.