Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Nissan Ariya – Which model is better for everyday use?
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Puma has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the Nissan Ariya costs 37300 £. That’s a price difference of around 12506 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s clearly perceptible more efficient than the Nissan Ariya with 17.70 kWh. That’s a difference of about 4.60 kWh.
As for range, the Nissan Ariya performs clearly perceptible better – achieving up to 531 km, about 155 km more than the Ford Puma.
Ariya
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Ariya has a clearly edge – offering 435 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 267 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Ariya is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 2.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Nissan Ariya tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Nissan Ariya pulls clearly stronger with 600 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 310 Nm difference.
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is convincingly lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1980 kg. The difference is around 664 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers somewhat more room – 523 L compared to 468 L. That’s a difference of about 55 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Nissan Ariya performs minimal better – up to 1350 L, which is about 67 L more than the Ford Puma.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma somewhat takes the win – 469 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 49 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Nissan Ariya shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
Ford Puma
Nissan Ariya
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £37,300
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Ariya
Ford Puma
1.7 (6 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Nissan Ariya
5 (1 Reviews)
The Nissan Ariya wraps futuristic, sculpted styling around a calm, high-tech cabin, making the switch to electric feel surprisingly easy and grown-up. It’s a comfortable, sensible EV that favors everyday usability and clever packaging over headline-grabbing theatrics — ideal for buyers who want an elegant, low-fuss electric car without the ego.
details
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Ford Puma
Nissan Ariya
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
37300 - 54800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 24.5 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
402 - 531 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
63 - 87 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1980 - 2277 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
415 - 468 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4595 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1850 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1650 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1280 - 1350 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
363 - 420 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
218 - 435 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5 - 7.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 200 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 600 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
160 - 320 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2022 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.