Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Renault Scénic - Differences and prices compared
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the Renault Scénic costs 34600 £. That’s a price difference of around 9857 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s evident more efficient than the Renault Scénic with 16.60 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3.50 kWh.
As for range, the Renault Scénic performs evident better – achieving up to 598 km, about 222 km more than the Ford Puma.
Scénic
@ Renault Group Media
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Scénic has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 218 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 50 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Renault Scénic takes 7.90 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs slightly better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Renault Scénic tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Renault Scénic pulls slight stronger with 300 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm difference.
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .
In curb weight, Ford Puma is noticeable lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1822 kg. The difference is around 506 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Renault Scénic offers slight more room – 545 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 22 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Renault Scénic performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1670 L, which is about 387 L more than the Ford Puma.
When it comes to payload, Renault Scénic hardly perceptible takes the win – 518 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 49 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Ford Puma proves to be has a very small edge and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Ford Puma is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £24,800
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Renault Scénic
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
1.7 (6 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Renault Scénic
5 (1 Reviews)
The Renault Scénic is a quietly clever family MPV that balances everyday practicality with unexpected flair, offering a roomy, flexible cabin that makes school runs and weekend escapes less of a chore. It won't dazzle like a sports car, but its composed ride, sensible tech and thoughtful storage solutions make it a superbly pragmatic choice for buyers who prefer substance with a wink.
details
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
Ford Puma
Renault Scénic
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
@ Renault Group Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
34600 - 44000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.5 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
420 - 598 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1822 - 1927 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
545 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4470 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1864 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1571 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1670 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
514 - 518 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
170 - 218 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
150 - 170 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
280 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
125 - 160 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Renault
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.