Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Renault Scénic comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 218 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 34,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Renault Scénic?
Ford Puma vs Renault Scénic: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Puma is clearly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Renault Scénic costs 34,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,714 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is markedly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 16.6 kWh/100km for the Renault Scénic. That’s a difference of about 3.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Renault Scénic offers visibly more range – reaching up to 598 km, about 181 km more than the Ford Puma.
Scénic
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Scénic offers clearly more power – delivering 218 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 50 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Renault Scénic takes 7.9 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Scénic delivers very slightly more torque with 300 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is noticeably lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,822 kg. The difference is around 506 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Renault Scénic offers only slightly more boot space – 545 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 22 L.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Scénic carries barely more – 518 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 49 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Renault Scénic
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Renault Scénic
The Renault Scenic is a practical and comfortable family car that prioritises interior flexibility and everyday usability. With a composed ride and clever storage solutions, it suits buyers who want a versatile, easy-to-live-with vehicle for family duties and daily driving.
details
Ford Puma
Renault Scénic
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
34,600 - 44,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
420 - 598 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,822 - 1,927 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
545 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,470 mm
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,864 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,571 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,670 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
514 - 518 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
170 - 218 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
150 - 170 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
280 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
125 - 160 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Renault
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.