Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs smart #1 comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 368 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 40,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or smart #1?
Ford Puma vs smart #1: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma is considerably cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the smart #1 costs 40,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,791 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is markedly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 18.2 kWh/100km for the smart #1. That’s a difference of about 5.2 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers barely more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 17 km more than the smart #1.
#1
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the smart #1 offers considerably more power – delivering 368 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 200 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the smart #1 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 2.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the smart #1 delivers clearly more torque with 470 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 180 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is significantly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,900 kg. The difference is around 584 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries very slightly more – 469 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 44 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The smart #1 comes out modestly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
£40,705
smart #1
Ford Puma
smart #1
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
smart #1
The Smart #1 feels like a breath of fresh air in the compact EV world, pairing playful styling with usable space and a cabin that punches above its size. It skips the fuss and delivers an easygoing, city-friendly driving experience with clever features that make it a sensible, slightly cheeky choice for everyday motoring.
details
Ford Puma
smart #1
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
40,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.2 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
400 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,900 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
313 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,822 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
368 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
470 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
271 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
smart
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.