VS

Ford Puma vs smart #1 – Differences & prices compared

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Ford Puma or smart #1 fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma @ puma.fordpresskits.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Ford Puma has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the smart #1 costs 31700 £. That’s a price difference of around 6934 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s distinct more efficient than the smart #1 with 16.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3.70 kWh.

As for range, the smart #1 performs slightly better – achieving up to 440 km, about 64 km more than the Ford Puma.

#1 @ Smart Deutschland

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the smart #1 has a clearly edge – offering 428 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 260 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the smart #1 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.90 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 3.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs somewhat better – reaching 210 km/h, while the smart #1 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: smart #1 pulls clearly stronger with 584 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 294 Nm difference.

Puma @ puma.fordpresskits.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly perceptible lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1780 kg. The difference is around 464 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers noticeable more room – 523 L compared to 323 L. That’s a difference of about 200 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs evident better – up to 1283 L, which is about 297 L more than the smart #1.

When it comes to payload, smart #1 slight takes the win – 470 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 1 kg.

Who wins the race?

The smart #1 proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
smart #1 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £31,700
P018_DSCF1498_EU

smart #1

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 272 - 428 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 16.8 - 18.2 kWh
  • Electric Range : 310 - 440 km
details

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma presents itself as a stylish compact SUV with a distinctive design that combines practicality with a dynamic driving experience. Its sleek lines and sporty aesthetics make it stand out on the road, while the interior offers a comfortable and tech-savvy environment. With an emphasis on efficiency and a smooth drive, the Ford Puma is well-suited for both urban commutes and countryside adventures.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29 @ puma.fordpresskits.com

smart #1

The smart #1 marks a significant evolution in design philosophy, merging urban practicality with modern aesthetics. Its compact size belies a spacious interior, crafted to offer a comfortable and connected driving experience. With its focus on eco-friendly motoring, the smart #1 is set to charm city dwellers seeking both efficiency and style.

details
P018_DSCF1498_EU @ Smart Deutschland
Limbo_Edition1_EXT_25_White_Gold_front @ Smart Deutschland
Limbo_Edition1_EXT_09_White_Gold_Powered_Tailgate @ Smart Deutschland
Limbo_Edition1_EXT_07_White_Gold_Powered_Top @ Smart Deutschland
Limbo_Edition1_EXT_05_White_Gold_side @ Smart Deutschland
P009_DSCF2991_EU @ Smart Deutschland
P012_DSC_1017_EU_New @ Smart Deutschland

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday practicality, the ID.3 for smooth, emissions-free cruising and lower running costs — your wallet and the planet will thank you differently.
Ford Puma
MG MG4
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered compact crossover that feels taut and practical — with Ford's lively chassis, a roomy MegaBox boot and mild‑hybrid frugality — the Puma is the small SUV to live with. But if you're ready to go electric without blowing the budget, the MG4 serves up surprising range, a spacious interior and brilliant value, making it the smarter, cleaner pick for everyday running.
Ford Puma
smart #1
Puma
#1

Costs and Consumption
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
31700 - 45000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
16.8 - 18.2 kWh
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
310 - 440 km
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
47 - 62 kWh
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1780 - 1900 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
313 - 323 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
4270 - 4300 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1822 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1636 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
976 - 986 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
425 - 470 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
272 - 428 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6.7 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
343 - 584 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
200 - 315 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2023 - 2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
smart

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
Vauxhall Corsa
VS
In the highly competitive compact car segment, the Ford Puma stands out with its robust styling and dynamic driving performance, offering a sporty edge perfect for city and country roads alike. In contrast, the Vauxhall Corsa impresses with its practical design and tech-forward interior, appealing to those who prioritize efficiency and comfort in a more streamlined package. Ultimately, the choice between the Puma and Corsa hinges on whether your preference leans towards spirited driving or urban practicality.
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma and the Renault 5 both offer unique appeals in the compact car segment. The Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and dynamic driving experience, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a blend of style and performance. In contrast, the Renault 5 charms with its iconic retro design and efficient urban mobility, making it a beloved choice for city drivers who appreciate a touch of nostalgia with modern functionality.
Ford Puma
Vauxhall Frontera
VS
In the latest showdown between the Ford Puma and Opel Frontera, performance enthusiasts will find the Puma's sleek design and nimble handling a stark contrast to the Frontera's rugged off-road capabilities. While the Puma excels in urban agility and fuel efficiency, the Frontera stands out for its durability and versatility in challenging terrains. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on personal lifestyle needs, with the Puma appealing more to city drivers and the Frontera capturing the spirit of adventure seekers.
Ford Puma
VW T-Cross
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Ford Puma showcases a sporty design and dynamic handling, appealing to those who crave a fun driving experience. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross emphasizes practicality and interior space, making it a top choice for families seeking comfort on the road. Both vehicles offer impressive tech features, but their differing approaches to style and functionality make this comparison a compelling one for potential buyers.
Ford Focus
Ford Puma
VS
In the realm of compact vehicles, the Ford Focus and Ford Puma present two compelling choices, each with its own unique appeal. The Focus is celebrated for its spacious interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it an ideal option for families and enthusiasts alike. On the other hand, the Puma stands out with its stylish design and versatility, offering a sportier feel while maintaining practicality for everyday use.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its premium interior and refined performance, appealing to buyers looking for a more upscale experience in this class.
Ford Puma
VW Golf
VS
In the competitive arena of compact cars, the Ford Puma and VW Golf stand out for their exceptional blend of style and performance. The Puma impresses with its sporty design and agile handling, while the Golf continues to be a benchmark for interior quality and tech features. Ultimately, choosing between these two vehicles may come down to personal preference, as both offer unique strengths tailored to different driving tastes.
Ford Puma
Hyundai Bayon
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover market, the Ford Puma and Hyundai Bayon both offer compelling choices for urban drivers. The Ford Puma is praised for its sporty handling and stylish design, making it a favorite for those who enjoy a dynamic driving experience. Meanwhile, the Hyundai Bayon excels in practicality with its efficient fuel consumption and spacious interior, catering to families and city dwellers alike.
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.