VS

Ford Puma vs Suzuki Swace comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 140 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 31,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Suzuki Swace?

Ford Puma vs Suzuki Swace: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • slightly more power
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat lighter
details

Suzuki Swace

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more efficient
  • moderately more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Ford Puma is clearly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Suzuki Swace costs 31,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,963 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki Swace uses 4.5 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.

Swace

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers slightly more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 140 HP. That’s roughly 28 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Suzuki Swace takes 9.4 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is somewhat lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,475 kg. The difference is around 159 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Suzuki Swace offers moderately more boot space – 596 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 73 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries markedly more – 469 kg compared to 360 kg. That’s a difference of about 109 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 404 - 417 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Kia EV2
VS
The Ford Puma and Kia EV2 represent two different approaches in the compact crossover class: the Puma delivers engaging handling, practical packaging and petrol/hybrid options, while the EV2 is a clean-sheet electric aimed at low running costs, range and modern tech. Choose the Puma if driving …
Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
Ford Puma
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Suzuki Swace

The Suzuki Swace is a pragmatic estate that swaps showy design for roomy practicality and a quiet, comfortable ride that suits everyday family life. It won't thrill the enthusiast, but its sensible charm, dependable build and clever packaging make it a smart pick for buyers who want fuss-free usability rather than headline-grabbing performance.

details
SUZUKI KARTE-1849_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1774_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1627_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-2074_sRGB
Suzuki_Swace_2

Reviews Suzuki Swace

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
Sjors
16 Apr 2026, 11:06:18

I have the Swace — it drives much more frugally than you state: 1:23. A downside as you get older is that getting in, and especially getting out, becomes harder because of the low seating position. The advantage of the low seat is better fuel economy. 16‑inch wheels are also likely to be more economical than larger ones. Rear legroom is poor. It would be nice if the rear bench were on rails like the Renault Twingo. Shrinking the boot would give more rear legroom. The 2014 Toyota Prius was the last to offer lots of rear legroom — after that it’s been rubbish.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
Ford Puma
Kia XCeed
VS
The Ford Puma and Kia XCeed are two of the sharper compact crossovers on the market, each mixing car-like driving manners with useful everyday practicality. This comparison looks at driving dynamics, interior quality, space and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your lifestyle.
Ford Puma
Skoda Epiq
VS
Ford Puma vs Skoda Epiq is a matchup between a compact, city-oriented crossover and a more conventional Skoda SUV offering (marketed here as the Epiq). This comparison focuses on what matters to real buyers: space, practicality, driving feel, running costs and which car suits which type of …
Ford Puma
Nissan Micra
VS
The Ford Puma and Nissan Micra both aim at city-minded drivers but take different paths: the Puma is a compact crossover that prioritises space, ride comfort and practicality, while the Micra is a small hatchback built around affordability, simplicity and easy urban manoeuvring. Choose the Puma if …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Bayon
VS
Ford Puma and Hyundai Bayon are compact crossover rivals that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling and efficient engines. This quick comparison highlights how they differ in driving feel, cabin practicality, equipment and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your daily needs.
Ford Puma
VW T-Roc
VS
The Ford Puma and the VW T‑Roc are two top choices in the compact crossover segment, but they deliver different strengths — the Puma leans sporty and driver-focused while the T‑Roc prioritises space and refinement. This quick comparison will highlight how their performance, practicality and tech …
Ford Puma
Opel Astra
VS
Choosing between the Ford Puma and the Vauxhall Astra comes down to whether you want a compact crossover with a sporty, raised stance or a more conventional family hatch with roomy practicality. The Puma brings a higher driving position and clever cargo solutions, while the Astra focuses on space, …
Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …
Ford Puma
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
102 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
43 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,475 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
596 L
Length
-
Length
4,655 mm
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,790 mm
Height
-
Height
1,460 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,606 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
360 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
140 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
103 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1,798 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Ford
Brand
Suzuki
What drivetrain options does the Ford Puma have?

The Ford Puma is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.