VS

Ford Puma vs Suzuki Swace - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (168 HP vs 140 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 31900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Suzuki Swace?

Ford Puma

2.9 (10 Reviews)
rate

Suzuki Swace

You can find all user reviews further down on this page.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Ford Puma has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £ , while the Suzuki Swace costs 31900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7106 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Suzuki Swace manages with 4.50 L and is therefore distinct more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.90 L per 100 km.

Swace

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a somewhat edge – offering 168 HP compared to 140 HP. That’s roughly 28 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Suzuki Swace takes 9.40 s. That’s about 2 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs slightly better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Suzuki Swace tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is somewhat lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1475 kg. The difference is around 159 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Suzuki Swace offers noticeable more room – 596 L compared to 456 L. That’s a difference of about 140 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Suzuki Swace performs evident better – up to 1606 L, which is about 390 L more than the Ford Puma.

When it comes to payload, Ford Puma noticeable takes the win – 469 kg compared to 360 kg. That’s a difference of about 109 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Ford Puma
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £24,800
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13 - 13.7 kWh
  • Electric Range : 404 - 417 km
details

Ford Puma

2.9 (10 Reviews)
rate

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Suzuki Swace

The Suzuki Swace is a pragmatic estate that swaps showy design for roomy practicality and a quiet, comfortable ride that suits everyday family life. It won't thrill the enthusiast, but its sensible charm, dependable build and clever packaging make it a smart pick for buyers who want fuss-free usability rather than headline-grabbing performance.

details
SUZUKI KARTE-1849_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1774_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1627_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-2074_sRGB
Suzuki_Swace_2

Reviews Ford Puma

2.9 (10 Reviews)
rate
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Reviews Suzuki Swace

Top Car Comparisons

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
Ford Puma
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
31900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
4.50 L
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
102 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
43 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1475 kg
Trunk capacity
456 L
Trunk capacity
596 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
4655 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1790 mm
Height
1550 mm
Height
1460 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 L
Max trunk capacity
1606 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
360 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
140 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.40 s
Max Speed
190 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
103 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1798 cm3

General
Model Year
2025 - 2026
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Ford
Brand
Suzuki

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
Lexus LBX
VS
In the dynamic crossover segment, the Ford Puma stands out with its sporty handling and responsive engine lineup, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun driving experience. In contrast, the Lexus LBX brings a touch of luxury and advanced technology, appealing to drivers who prioritize comfort …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Kona
VS
In this exciting comparison, the Ford Puma takes on the Hyundai Kona, two standout competitors in the crossover segment. The Puma impresses with its engaging driving dynamics and stylish design, while the Kona offers a more tech-savvy interior and a range of efficient powertrains. Ultimately, both …
Ford Puma
Opel Mokka
VS
In the competitive segment of subcompact SUVs, the Ford Puma and Opel Mokka stand out with their distinctive styles and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty design and flexible interior, offering practicality without compromising on aesthetics, while the Mokka captivates …
Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Ford Puma stands out with its striking design and impressive driving dynamics, making it a popular choice for those seeking a sporty feel. Meanwhile, the SEAT Arona appeals to buyers with its spacious interior and efficient engine options, offering …
Ford Puma
VW T-Cross
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Ford Puma showcases a sporty design and dynamic handling, appealing to those who crave a fun driving experience. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross emphasizes practicality and interior space, making it a top choice for families seeking comfort on the road. Both …
Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla
VS
In the competitive compact car segment, the Suzuki Swace and Toyota Corolla present enticing options for buyers seeking reliability and efficiency. While both share a similar platform, the Swace offers distinctive styling and a slightly sportier driving experience, appealing to those who prioritize …
Ford Puma
Opel Frontera
VS
The Ford Puma feels like a sprightly urban fox — compact, efficient and packed with modern tech, perfect if you want lively handling and low running costs for daily driving. The Opel Frontera is all rugged charm and chunky presence, built for dirt tracks and weekend hauls rather than tight city …
Ford Focus
Suzuki Swace
VS
In a showdown between the Ford Focus and the Suzuki Swace, the Focus stands out with its dynamic handling and robust engine options that cater to driving enthusiasts seeking a spirited ride. Meanwhile, the Suzuki Swace offers a practical hybrid drivetrain with outstanding fuel efficiency, making it …
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.