VS

Ford Puma vs Toyota Aygo - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (168 HP vs 116 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 15500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Toyota Aygo?

Puma

Ford Puma vs. Toyota Aygo: A Comprehensive Comparison

The automotive market continues to evolve, presenting drivers with a plethora of options that cater to various preferences and needs. Among the many vehicles vying for attention, the Ford Puma and Toyota Aygo stand out for different reasons. While the Puma appeals to those seeking a sporty compact SUV, the Aygo targets consumers looking for a nimble urban runabout. This article delves into the technical aspects, innovations, and overall performance of both models, helping you make an informed choice.

Aygo

Performance and Powertrain

The Ford Puma boasts a robust lineup of petrol Mild-Hybrid Electric Vehicle (MHEV) engines, with power outputs ranging from 125 to 160 HP. This offers options for drivers who desire a sprightly drive without compromising efficiency. With standard front-wheel drive, the Puma showcases impressive acceleration capabilities, clocking in at as low as 7.4 seconds from 0 to 100 km/h.

In contrast, the Toyota Aygo houses a modest 72 HP engine, making it less potent than the Puma. With front-wheel drive as well, the Aygo struggles with acceleration, taking up to 15.6 seconds for the 0 to 100 km/h sprint. While the Aygo's engine is designed for efficiency, its low power output may not suit those needing a peppy performance from their vehicle.

Puma

Fuel Efficiency

One of the key factors for many buyers is fuel efficiency. The Ford Puma records a consumption of approximately 5.4 to 6 L/100km, which is commendable for a compact SUV. It can produce CO2 emissions ranging from 121 to 136 g/km, fitting within the 'D' to 'E' efficiency classes.

The Toyota Aygo, however, is ahead in this category with consumption figures between 4.8 to 4.9 L/100km and CO2 emissions of 108 to 112 g/km, which helps it secure a 'C' efficiency class rating. This compelling fuel efficiency makes the Aygo an attractive choice for city dwellers seeking economical solutions.

Aygo

Dimensions and Interior Space

The Ford Puma measures a substantial 4186 mm in length, 1805 mm in width, and 1550 mm in height, enabling it to offer adequate space for five passengers. Its trunk capacity of 456 liters is generous, allowing for ample luggage or grocery storage, making it practical for family outings or long trips.

On the other hand, the Toyota Aygo stands more compact, with dimensions of 3700 mm in length, 1740 mm in width, and 1510 mm in height. While it accommodates four passengers comfortably, its trunk space trailing at 231 liters might limit its capabilities for transporting larger items.

Puma

Technology and Innovations

Ford has integrated several cutting-edge technologies into the Puma, including a state-of-the-art infotainment system that boasts a large touchscreen interface with smartphone connectivity options. Additionally, the Puma comes equipped with advanced driver-assistance systems, elevating driver confidence and safety.

The Aygo, while simpler in its approach, includes essential tech features focused on connectivity and ease of use. The Toyota's infotainment system supports various apps but may lack some of the advanced functionalities found in the Puma.

Aygo

Conclusion

When choosing between the Ford Puma and Toyota Aygo, potential buyers must consider their needs and priorities. The Puma excels in performance, space, and technology, ideal for those looking for a more versatile compact SUV that can tackle various driving conditions. Meanwhile, the Aygo shines in efficiency, making it a compelling option for urban drivers seeking a manageable and economical vehicle.

Ultimately, your decision should be guided by what you value most in a vehicle—be it power, space, efficiency, or technology. Test-driving both models will provide further insight into which car will best fit your lifestyle.

Ford Puma

2.9 (10 Reviews)
rate

Toyota Aygo

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

You can find all user reviews further down on this page.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Toyota Aygo has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 15500 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9266 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Toyota Aygo manages with 3.70 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 1.70 L per 100 km.

Aygo

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a distinct edge – offering 168 HP compared to 116 HP. That’s roughly 52 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Toyota Aygo takes 9.20 s. That’s about 1.80 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Toyota Aygo tops out at 158 km/h. The difference is around 52 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls decisively stronger with 290 Nm compared to 120 Nm. That’s about 170 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Ford Puma offers to a small extent more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.

In curb weight, Toyota Aygo is noticeable lighter – 1015 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 301 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers convincingly more room – 523 L compared to 231 L. That’s a difference of about 292 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs distinct better – up to 1283 L, which is about 454 L more than the Toyota Aygo.

When it comes to payload, Ford Puma a bit takes the win – 469 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 49 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Ford Puma
Toyota Aygo

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £24,800
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13.1 - 13.9 kWh
  • Electric Range : 361 - 376 km
details

Ford Puma

2.9 (10 Reviews)
rate

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Toyota Aygo

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Aygo is a cheeky city car that turns congested streets into a playground, with bold styling and sprightly manners that make parking a pleasure rather than a pain. Economical to run and surprisingly well equipped for its size, the Aygo is a smart choice for urban buyers who want personality without a premium price and a car that brings a smile to the daily commute.

details
75916-2022aygoxdplstaticginger003-web-lr
75919-2022aygoxdplstaticginger006-web-lr
75917-2022aygoxdplstaticginger004-web-lr
75918-2022aygoxdplstaticginger005-web-lr
75881-2022aygoxdpldetailginger007-web-lr
75806-2022aygoxdpldetailchilired003-web-lr

Reviews Ford Puma

2.9 (10 Reviews)
rate
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Reviews Toyota Aygo

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Suzuki Swift
Toyota Aygo
VS
If you want a pocket rocket that’s actually practical, the Suzuki Swift mixes sprightly handling, a surprisingly roomy cabin and sensible running costs — ideal for buyers who want fun without sacrificing everyday usability. The Toyota Aygo, meanwhile, is the cheeky city specialist: cheaper to buy, …
Ford Puma
Toyota Aygo

Costs and Consumption
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
15500 - 24300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 4.9 L
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
85 - 111 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
35 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1015 - 1090 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
231 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
3700 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1740 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1510 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
829 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
345 - 420 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
72 - 116 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.2 - 15.6 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
151 - 158 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
93 - 120 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
53 - 85 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
998 - 1490 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Toyota

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
Ford Puma
Lexus LBX
VS
In the dynamic crossover segment, the Ford Puma stands out with its sporty handling and responsive engine lineup, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun driving experience. In contrast, the Lexus LBX brings a touch of luxury and advanced technology, appealing to drivers who prioritize comfort …
Toyota Aygo
Toyota Yaris
VS
The Aygo is a cheeky, pocket-sized city flirt — nimble, affordable and full of personality, but cramped and a little outgunned on fast roads. The Yaris is the grown-up supermini: roomier, safer and available as a frugal hybrid, making it the smarter choice for buyers who want everyday practicality …
Ford Puma
Opel Frontera
VS
The Ford Puma feels like a sprightly urban fox — compact, efficient and packed with modern tech, perfect if you want lively handling and low running costs for daily driving. The Opel Frontera is all rugged charm and chunky presence, built for dirt tracks and weekend hauls rather than tight city …
Ford Puma
Opel Mokka
VS
In the competitive segment of subcompact SUVs, the Ford Puma and Opel Mokka stand out with their distinctive styles and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty design and flexible interior, offering practicality without compromising on aesthetics, while the Mokka captivates …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Kona
VS
In this exciting comparison, the Ford Puma takes on the Hyundai Kona, two standout competitors in the crossover segment. The Puma impresses with its engaging driving dynamics and stylish design, while the Kona offers a more tech-savvy interior and a range of efficient powertrains. Ultimately, both …
Suzuki Ignis
Toyota Aygo
VS
The Suzuki Ignis and Toyota Aygo compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Ford Puma stands out with its striking design and impressive driving dynamics, making it a popular choice for those seeking a sporty feel. Meanwhile, the SEAT Arona appeals to buyers with its spacious interior and efficient engine options, offering …
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.