@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

@ Toyota Motor Corporation

Ford Puma vs Toyota Aygo – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Q: What is the maximum horsepower of the Ford Puma?

Up to 168 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

Q: What is the fuel consumption of the Ford Puma according to the manufacturer?

On average, the Ford Puma consumes 5.40 L.

Q: How much electricity does the Ford Puma use per 100 km?

According to the manufacturer, the Ford Puma requires 13.10 kWh.

Q: What is the Ford Puma’s maximum WLTP range?

The WLTP range is up to 376 km.

Q: What is the battery capacity of the Ford Puma?

The Ford Puma comes with a 43 kWh battery.

Q: What is the top speed of the Ford Puma?

The Ford Puma reaches up to 210 km/h.

Q: What are the Ford Puma’s length, width and height?

Overall, the Ford Puma is 4214 mm long, 1805 mm wide and 1555 mm high.

Q: What drive types are available for the Toyota Aygo?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

Q: How much power does the Toyota Aygo deliver on the road?

Up to 72 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Toyota Aygo?

scroll down

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Puma vs. Toyota Aygo: A Comprehensive Comparison

The automotive market continues to evolve, presenting drivers with a plethora of options that cater to various preferences and needs. Among the many vehicles vying for attention, the Ford Puma and Toyota Aygo stand out for different reasons. While the Puma appeals to those seeking a sporty compact SUV, the Aygo targets consumers looking for a nimble urban runabout. This article delves into the technical aspects, innovations, and overall performance of both models, helping you make an informed choice.

Aygo @ Toyota Motor Corporation

Performance and Powertrain

The Ford Puma boasts a robust lineup of petrol Mild-Hybrid Electric Vehicle (MHEV) engines, with power outputs ranging from 125 to 160 HP. This offers options for drivers who desire a sprightly drive without compromising efficiency. With standard front-wheel drive, the Puma showcases impressive acceleration capabilities, clocking in at as low as 7.4 seconds from 0 to 100 km/h.

In contrast, the Toyota Aygo houses a modest 72 HP engine, making it less potent than the Puma. With front-wheel drive as well, the Aygo struggles with acceleration, taking up to 15.6 seconds for the 0 to 100 km/h sprint. While the Aygo's engine is designed for efficiency, its low power output may not suit those needing a peppy performance from their vehicle.

scroll down

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Fuel Efficiency

One of the key factors for many buyers is fuel efficiency. The Ford Puma records a consumption of approximately 5.4 to 6 L/100km, which is commendable for a compact SUV. It can produce CO2 emissions ranging from 121 to 136 g/km, fitting within the 'D' to 'E' efficiency classes.

The Toyota Aygo, however, is ahead in this category with consumption figures between 4.8 to 4.9 L/100km and CO2 emissions of 108 to 112 g/km, which helps it secure a 'C' efficiency class rating. This compelling fuel efficiency makes the Aygo an attractive choice for city dwellers seeking economical solutions.

Aygo @ Toyota Motor Corporation

Dimensions and Interior Space

The Ford Puma measures a substantial 4186 mm in length, 1805 mm in width, and 1550 mm in height, enabling it to offer adequate space for five passengers. Its trunk capacity of 456 liters is generous, allowing for ample luggage or grocery storage, making it practical for family outings or long trips.

On the other hand, the Toyota Aygo stands more compact, with dimensions of 3700 mm in length, 1740 mm in width, and 1510 mm in height. While it accommodates four passengers comfortably, its trunk space trailing at 231 liters might limit its capabilities for transporting larger items.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Technology and Innovations

Ford has integrated several cutting-edge technologies into the Puma, including a state-of-the-art infotainment system that boasts a large touchscreen interface with smartphone connectivity options. Additionally, the Puma comes equipped with advanced driver-assistance systems, elevating driver confidence and safety.

The Aygo, while simpler in its approach, includes essential tech features focused on connectivity and ease of use. The Toyota's infotainment system supports various apps but may lack some of the advanced functionalities found in the Puma.

Aygo @ Toyota Motor Corporation

Conclusion

When choosing between the Ford Puma and Toyota Aygo, potential buyers must consider their needs and priorities. The Puma excels in performance, space, and technology, ideal for those looking for a more versatile compact SUV that can tackle various driving conditions. Meanwhile, the Aygo shines in efficiency, making it a compelling option for urban drivers seeking a manageable and economical vehicle.

Ultimately, your decision should be guided by what you value most in a vehicle—be it power, space, efficiency, or technology. Test-driving both models will provide further insight into which car will best fit your lifestyle.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Toyota Aygo has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 15500 £, while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £. That’s a price difference of around 9266 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Toyota Aygo manages with 4.80 L and is therefore a bit more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.60 L per 100 km.

Aygo @ Toyota Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a significantly edge – offering 168 HP compared to 72 HP. That’s roughly 96 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Toyota Aygo takes 15.50 s. That’s about 8.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Toyota Aygo tops out at 158 km/h. The difference is around 52 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls decisively stronger with 290 Nm compared to 93 Nm. That’s about 197 Nm difference.

scroll down

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Ford Puma offers to a small extent more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.

In curb weight, Toyota Aygo is noticeable lighter – 1015 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 301 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers convincingly more room – 523 L compared to 231 L. That’s a difference of about 292 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs distinct better – up to 1283 L, which is about 454 L more than the Toyota Aygo.

When it comes to payload, Ford Puma noticeable takes the win – 469 kg compared to 345 kg. That’s a difference of about 124 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Ford Puma proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Ford Puma is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £24,800

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Puma

Price : 24800 - 36300 £
Body Type : SUV
Engine Type : Electric, Petrol MHEV
Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail : Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption kWh/100km : 13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Electric Range : 361 - 376 km
Battery Capacity : 43 kWh
Seats : 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h : 7.4 - 9.8 s
Model Year : 2025
Max Speed : 160 - 210 km/h
Torque : 170 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders : 3
Doors : 5
Model : Puma
Modell : Puma Gen-E, Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid, Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid ST
CO2 Efficiency Class : A, D
Trim Level : Sound Edition, Premium, Titanium, Titanium PowerShift Automatik, ST-Line, ST-Line PowerShift Automatik, ST-Line X, ST-Line X PowerShift Automatik, Sound Edition PowerShift Automatik, PowerShift Automatik
Power kW : 92 - 124 kW
co2 : 0 - 135 g/km
Engine capacity : 999 cm3
Curb weight : 1316 - 1563 kg
Fuel tank capacity : 42 L
Trunk capacity : 456 - 523 L
Length : 4186 - 4226 mm
Width : 1805 mm
Height : 1550 - 1555 mm
Brand : Ford
Max trunk capacity : 1216 - 1283 L
Payload : 367 - 469 kg

details

Ford Puma

5 (1)

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Toyota Aygo

The Toyota Aygo presents itself as a compact city car, perfect for navigating tight urban spaces with ease. Its stylish design is complemented by a vibrant variety of colour options, making it a standout choice for those looking to express their individuality. Inside, the Aygo offers a comfortable and functional cabin, equipped with modern features that enhance the overall driving experience.

details

75916-2022aygoxdplstaticginger003-web-lr

@ Toyota Motor Corporation

75919-2022aygoxdplstaticginger006-web-lr

@ Toyota Motor Corporation

75917-2022aygoxdplstaticginger004-web-lr

@ Toyota Motor Corporation

75918-2022aygoxdplstaticginger005-web-lr

@ Toyota Motor Corporation

75881-2022aygoxdpldetailginger007-web-lr

@ Toyota Motor Corporation

75806-2022aygoxdpldetailchilired003-web-lr

@ Toyota Motor Corporation

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Puma

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

VW ID.3

If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Puma

@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

MG MG4

If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered compact crossover that feels taut and practical — with Ford's lively chassis, a roomy MegaBox boot and mild‑hybrid frugality — the Puma is the small SUV to live with. But if you're ready to go electric without blowing the budget, the MG4 serves up surprising …

Ford Puma

Toyota Aygo

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center	@ Toyota Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price 24800 - 36300 £	Price 15500 - 22100 £
Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L	Consumption L/100km 4.8 - 4.9 L
Consumption kWh/100km 13.1 - 13.9 kWh	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 361 - 376 km	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity 43 kWh	Battery Capacity -
co2 0 - 135 g/km	co2 108 - 111 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 42 L	Fuel tank capacity 35 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 4
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1316 - 1563 kg	Curb weight 1015 kg
Trunk capacity 456 - 523 L	Trunk capacity 231 L
Length 4186 - 4226 mm	Length 3700 mm
Width 1805 mm	Width 1740 mm
Height 1550 - 1555 mm	Height 1510 mm
Max trunk capacity 1216 - 1283 L	Max trunk capacity 829 L
Payload 367 - 469 kg	Payload 345 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Electric, Petrol MHEV	Engine Type Petrol
Transmission Automatic, Manuel	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, CVT
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 125 - 168 HP	Power HP 72 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.4 - 9.8 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 15.5 - 15.6 s
Max Speed 160 - 210 km/h	Max Speed 151 - 158 km/h
Torque 170 - 290 Nm	Torque 93 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3	Number of Cylinders 3
Power kW 92 - 124 kW	Power kW 53 kW
Engine capacity 999 cm3	Engine capacity 998 cm3