VS

Ford Puma vs Toyota Aygo comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 116 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 18,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Toyota Aygo?

Ford Puma vs Toyota Aygo: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h

Toyota Aygo

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • substantially more efficient
  • clearly lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Puma

Ford Puma vs. Toyota Aygo: A Comprehensive Comparison

The automotive market continues to evolve, presenting drivers with a plethora of options that cater to various preferences and needs. Among the many vehicles vying for attention, the Ford Puma and Toyota Aygo stand out for different reasons. While the Puma appeals to those seeking a sporty compact SUV, the Aygo targets consumers looking for a nimble urban runabout. This article delves into the technical aspects, innovations, and overall performance of both models, helping you make an informed choice.

Aygo

Performance and Powertrain

The Ford Puma boasts a robust lineup of petrol Mild-Hybrid Electric Vehicle (MHEV) engines, with power outputs ranging from 125 to 160 HP. This offers options for drivers who desire a sprightly drive without compromising efficiency. With standard front-wheel drive, the Puma showcases impressive acceleration capabilities, clocking in at as low as 7.4 seconds from 0 to 100 km/h.

In contrast, the Toyota Aygo houses a modest 72 HP engine, making it less potent than the Puma. With front-wheel drive as well, the Aygo struggles with acceleration, taking up to 15.6 seconds for the 0 to 100 km/h sprint. While the Aygo's engine is designed for efficiency, its low power output may not suit those needing a peppy performance from their vehicle.

Puma

Fuel Efficiency

One of the key factors for many buyers is fuel efficiency. The Ford Puma records a consumption of approximately 5.4 to 6 L/100km, which is commendable for a compact SUV. It can produce CO2 emissions ranging from 121 to 136 g/km, fitting within the 'D' to 'E' efficiency classes.

The Toyota Aygo, however, is ahead in this category with consumption figures between 4.8 to 4.9 L/100km and CO2 emissions of 108 to 112 g/km, which helps it secure a 'C' efficiency class rating. This compelling fuel efficiency makes the Aygo an attractive choice for city dwellers seeking economical solutions.

Aygo

Dimensions and Interior Space

The Ford Puma measures a substantial 4186 mm in length, 1805 mm in width, and 1550 mm in height, enabling it to offer adequate space for five passengers. Its trunk capacity of 456 liters is generous, allowing for ample luggage or grocery storage, making it practical for family outings or long trips.

On the other hand, the Toyota Aygo stands more compact, with dimensions of 3700 mm in length, 1740 mm in width, and 1510 mm in height. While it accommodates four passengers comfortably, its trunk space trailing at 231 liters might limit its capabilities for transporting larger items.

Puma

Technology and Innovations

Ford has integrated several cutting-edge technologies into the Puma, including a state-of-the-art infotainment system that boasts a large touchscreen interface with smartphone connectivity options. Additionally, the Puma comes equipped with advanced driver-assistance systems, elevating driver confidence and safety.

The Aygo, while simpler in its approach, includes essential tech features focused on connectivity and ease of use. The Toyota's infotainment system supports various apps but may lack some of the advanced functionalities found in the Puma.

Aygo

Conclusion

When choosing between the Ford Puma and Toyota Aygo, potential buyers must consider their needs and priorities. The Puma excels in performance, space, and technology, ideal for those looking for a more versatile compact SUV that can tackle various driving conditions. Meanwhile, the Aygo shines in efficiency, making it a compelling option for urban drivers seeking a manageable and economical vehicle.

Ultimately, your decision should be guided by what you value most in a vehicle—be it power, space, efficiency, or technology. Test-driving both models will provide further insight into which car will best fit your lifestyle.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …
Suzuki Swift
Toyota Aygo
VS
If you want a pocket rocket that’s actually practical, the Suzuki Swift mixes sprightly handling, a surprisingly roomy cabin and sensible running costs — ideal for buyers who want fun without sacrificing everyday usability. The Toyota Aygo, meanwhile, is the cheeky city specialist: cheaper to buy, …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Toyota Aygo is noticeably cheaper – starting at 18,800 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,066 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota Aygo uses 3.7 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 1.7 L/100km.

Aygo

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers clearly more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 116 HP. That’s roughly 52 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Toyota Aygo takes 9.2 s. That’s about 1.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers clearly more torque with 290 Nm compared to 120 Nm. That’s about 170 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Ford Puma offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota Aygo is clearly lighter – 1,090 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 226 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries somewhat more – 469 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 49 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 404 - 417 km
details
Ford Puma
Toyota Aygo

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Toyota Aygo

The Aygo is a cheeky city car that turns congested streets into a playground, with bold styling and sprightly manners that make parking a pleasure rather than a pain. Economical to run and surprisingly well equipped for its size, the Aygo is a smart choice for urban buyers who want personality without a premium price and a car that brings a smile to the daily commute.

details
75916-2022aygoxdplstaticginger003-web-lr
75919-2022aygoxdplstaticginger006-web-lr
75917-2022aygoxdplstaticginger004-web-lr
75918-2022aygoxdplstaticginger005-web-lr
75881-2022aygoxdpldetailginger007-web-lr
75806-2022aygoxdpldetailchilired003-web-lr

Reviews Toyota Aygo

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
giuseppe
3 Dec 2025, 14:18:34

Great, not least because it makes excellent use of the automatic gearbox; I also found it better assembled and more refined.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Suzuki Ignis
Toyota Aygo
VS
The Suzuki Ignis feels like a pint‑sized crossover — taller ride, roomier boot and a dash of go‑anywhere attitude — while the Toyota Aygo is a cheeky city sprite: compact, cheap to run and brilliant at threading through town. Pick the Ignis if you want practicality and a bit of off‑road bravado in …
Toyota Aygo
Toyota Yaris
VS
The Aygo is a cheeky, pocket-sized city flirt — nimble, affordable and full of personality, but cramped and a little outgunned on fast roads. The Yaris is the grown-up supermini: roomier, safer and available as a frugal hybrid, making it the smarter choice for buyers who want everyday practicality …
Ford Puma
VW T-Cross
VS
The Ford Puma and VW T‑Cross go head-to-head in the compact crossover class — one flirty and fun, the other sensible and steady — both promising SUV looks without the bulk. We’ll pit the Puma’s lively handling and clever storage tricks against the T‑Cross’s comfort-first setup and family-friendly …
Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
Ford Puma
Lexus LBX
VS
Small crossover clash: the Ford Puma brings cheeky driving dynamics and clever practicality, while the Lexus LBX counters with quiet refinement and premium flair. Pick the Puma if you want fun and value, choose the LBX if you crave comfort and a luxury badge — either way, you’ll be trading up from …
Ford Puma
Toyota Aygo

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
18,800 - 24,300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
85 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,090 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
231 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,740 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
420 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
116 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
120 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
85 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1,490 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Toyota
What drivetrain options does the Ford Puma have?

The Ford Puma is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.