Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Toyota Aygo - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 72 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 15500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Toyota Aygo?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Toyota Aygo has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 15500 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9266 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Toyota Aygo manages with 4.80 L and is therefore a bit more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.60 L per 100 km.
Aygo
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a significantly edge – offering 168 HP compared to 72 HP. That’s roughly 96 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Toyota Aygo takes 15.50 s. That’s about 8.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Toyota Aygo tops out at 158 km/h. The difference is around 52 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls decisively stronger with 290 Nm compared to 93 Nm. That’s about 197 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Puma offers to a small extent more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.
In curb weight, Toyota Aygo is noticeable lighter – 1015 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 301 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers convincingly more room – 523 L compared to 231 L. That’s a difference of about 292 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs distinct better – up to 1283 L, which is about 454 L more than the Toyota Aygo.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma noticeable takes the win – 469 kg compared to 345 kg. That’s a difference of about 124 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Ford Puma proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Ford Puma is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £24,800
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Toyota Aygo
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Toyota Aygo
5 (1 Reviews)
The Aygo is a cheeky city car that turns congested streets into a playground, with bold styling and sprightly manners that make parking a pleasure rather than a pain. Economical to run and surprisingly well equipped for its size, the Aygo is a smart choice for urban buyers who want personality without a premium price and a car that brings a smile to the daily commute.
details
Ford Puma
Toyota Aygo
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
15500 - 22100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 4.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
108 - 111 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1015 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
231 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
3700 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1740 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1510 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
829 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
345 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
72 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
15.5 - 15.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
151 - 158 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
93 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
53 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.