In a compelling showdown between the Ford Puma and Toyota Yaris, these compact contenders offer distinct advantages for urban drivers. The Ford Puma impresses with its sporty design and agile handling, making it a fun choice for those who crave an engaging drive. Meanwhile, the Toyota Yaris stands out for its reliability and fuel efficiency, appealing to consumers who prioritize practicality in their daily commutes.
The compact SUV segment has been gaining significant popularity as urban dwellers seek practicality, style, and efficiency. Among the leading contenders in this category are the Ford Puma and the Toyota Yaris. Both vehicles boast unique features and advantages that cater to different types of drivers. Let’s delve into a comparison of these two models, focusing on their technical specifications, innovations, and overall performance.
The Ford Puma is classified as a compact SUV, making it a versatile choice for those needing extra cargo space and higher ground clearance. The Puma measures between 4186 and 4226 mm in length, 1805 mm in width, and stands between 1550 and 1555 mm in height.
On the other hand, the Toyota Yaris comes as a hatchback and is more compact, with a length ranging from 3940 to 3995 mm, a width of 1745 to 1805 mm, and a height of 1455 to 1500 mm. This difference in body types reflects a divergent approach. The Puma favors a sportier drive with more utility, while the Yaris is aimed at maximizing maneuverability and urban efficiency.
Under the hood, the Ford Puma features several petrol options, including MHEV variants with power outputs ranging from 125 to 168 HP. The electric version boasts a notable electric range of up to 376 km and offers a maximum speed of 210 km/h. Fuel consumption is competitive, with figures noting as low as 5.4 L/100 km for petrol and 13.1 kWh/100 km for electric. The Puma can accelerate from 0-100 km/h in as little as 7.4 seconds.
The Toyota Yaris, in contrast, offers a different powertrain with a full hybrid system producing up to 130 HP. Fuel efficiency is impressive, with consumption rates as low as 3.8 L/100 km for the hybrid version, making it ideal for city driving. The Yaris can reach a maximum speed of 230 km/h while achieving 0-100 km/h acceleration in just 9.2 seconds for the hybrid model.
Ford presents the Puma with options for both manual and automatic transmissions, including an advanced dual-clutch system. It is primarily a front-wheel-drive vehicle, catering to everyday city driving with a sporty feel.
Meanwhile, the Toyota Yaris offers a versatile driving experience with both front-wheel and all-wheel drive options, equipped with CVT for seamless acceleration in hybrid variants. This flexibility enhances the Yaris's capability to handle diverse road conditions, especially with its all-wheel-drive offering.
When it comes to cabin space, the Ford Puma excels with a trunk capacity ranging from 456 to 523 L, making it an excellent choice for families and those needing extra luggage space. It comfortably seats five passengers, enhancing its utility.
The Toyota Yaris, while offering a smaller trunk size of 286 to 141 L, still provides adequate room for five passengers in its hatchback design. The focus here is more on compactness and efficiency, making it easier to navigate city streets.
Innovation is evident in both models. The Ford Puma leverages Ford's latest in-car technology, including an advanced infotainment system with a user-friendly interface and smartphone integration. Additionally, it showcases Ford's commitment to sustainability with its MHEV options.
The Toyota Yaris shines with its Toyota Safety Sense technology, incorporating advanced safety features such as pre-collision systems, lane departure alerts, and adaptive cruise control. This commitment to safety makes the Yaris a great choice for safety-conscious drivers.
Both the Ford Puma and the Toyota Yaris represent excellent choices in their respective segments. The Puma stands out for those seeking a sporty, spacious SUV with hybrid and fully electric options, while the Yaris appeals to those looking for a compact, efficient, and safe hatchback. Ultimately, the choice depends on personal preferences regarding space, performance, and driving experience.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 24800 - 34800
£
|
Price
about 21900 - 42800
£
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6
L
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 9.5
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.7
kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
364 - 376
km
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
43
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
121, 129, 128, 136, 0
g/km
|
co2
87 - 215
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
42
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
36 - 50
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
3 - 5
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563
kg
|
Curb weight
1090 - 1356
kg
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523
L
|
Trunk capacity
141 - 286
L
|
Length
4186 - 4226
mm
|
Length
3940 - 3995
mm
|
Width
1805
mm
|
Width
1745 - 1805
mm
|
Height
1550 - 1555
mm
|
Height
1455 - 1500
mm
|
Payload
367 - 469
kg
|
Payload
289 - 525
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
125 - 168
HP
|
Power HP
116 - 280
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.5 - 9.7
s
|
Max Speed
160 - 210
km/h
|
Max Speed
175 - 230
km/h
|
Torque
170 - 290
Nm
|
Torque
390
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Power kW
92 - 124
kW
|
Power kW
85 - 206
kW
|
Engine capacity
999
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1490 - 1618
cm3
|
Top speed
160 - 210
km/h
|
Top speed
175 - 230
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Toyota
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.