VS

Ford Puma vs Toyota Yaris comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 280 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 21,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Toyota Yaris?

Ford Puma vs Toyota Yaris: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more trunk space
details

Toyota Yaris

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Puma

Quick take: Ford Puma and Toyota Yaris in one glance

The Ford Puma and Toyota Yaris sit on different sides of the small‑car spectrum, and a Ford Puma VS Toyota Yaris comparison shows how those choices play out in daily life. The Puma behaves more like a compact crossover with a sporty edge and unusually practical luggage solutions, while the Yaris presents itself as a fuss‑free, ultra‑efficient city hybrid. This piece focuses on how each car feels, lives and annoys you rather than on raw numbers. Read on if you want to know which one is easier to park, which is nicer on a motorway run, and which will frustrate you after an afternoon of errands.

Yaris

Character and driving experience

The Ford Puma leans into engagement: sharp steering, eager turn‑in and a suspension setup that rewards an enthusiastic driver, so it feels entertaining on twisty roads. The Toyota Yaris, by contrast, is tuned for calm efficiency — its hybrid system makes town driving serene and masks urgency in favour of smoothness. That difference matters: choose the Puma if you enjoy being involved behind the wheel and want a car that makes ordinary trips feel lively; pick the Yaris if you prefer a settled, low‑stress commute where economy and ease matter more than drama. Both are competent around town, but the Puma brings the sportier personality and the Yaris the composed, economical temperament.

Puma

Comfort and cabin feel

Up front the Ford Puma generally offers firmer, well‑supporting seats that suit longer stints and spirited driving, though some interior plastics and the touch‑centric climate controls reduce the premium feel. The Toyota Yaris trades a bit of seat plushness for a quieter, more composed city experience thanks to frequent electric running and a simple, clear layout. Rear space is a weak point for both: the Puma’s back bench is cramped and the Yaris’s rear doors and seat width feel noticeably tighter, so adults will be uncomfortable on anything but short hops. If front‑seat comfort and driver engagement top your list, Puma has the edge; if quiet city cruising and intuitive packaging matter, Yaris is the better fit.

Yaris

Usability and practical everyday cargo

Practicality is where the Puma punches above its class — the boot opening, a variable floor and a clever underfloor wash‑out compartment make loading awkward items and muddy kit far less of a chore. The Yaris carries less bulk and its luggage area is tall and awkwardly shaped, making it less forgiving when you need to fit strollers or big boxes. Both cars are compact and easy to park, but the Puma’s cargo flexibility changes what you can realistically use it for on weekends and active lifestyles. If you regularly ferry gear, dogs or shopping, the Puma will save you fiddly moments; if you mainly carry a couple of bags and value minimal running costs, Yaris remains perfectly practical.

Puma

City friendliness versus long‑distance behaviour

In the urban environment the Toyota Yaris shines: tiny dimensions, hybrid electric running and a low cost of ownership make it effortless and cheap to operate day to day. The Ford Puma is also city capable but shows its strengths beyond town—on fast country lanes and motorways it feels more planted and less effortful at sustained speeds, so longer trips are more pleasant. Noise is a factor: the Yaris stays whisper‑quiet in town but can become vocal under heavy acceleration, while the Puma’s three‑cylinder note is more pronounced at low revs but generally settles on the motorway. Put simply, choose Yaris for tight city use and economy, Puma if your driving mixes town with regular longer journeys and you value a more engaging highway demeanour.

Which buyer suits which car — a practical split

If you are a commuter who prioritises the lowest running costs, a relaxed urban routine and maximum simplicity, the Toyota Yaris is the natural fit and will repay you in everyday efficiency and minimal fuss. If your week includes spirited routes, family outings with bulky equipment, or you simply want a small car that behaves like a mini crossover with useful load flexibility, the Ford Puma aligns better with that lifestyle. Both cars trade off rear‑seat space, so families with frequent rear‑seat adults should weigh that carefully when choosing. Read the technical comparison next to see how these real‑world differences translate into fuel, weight and performance details that refine the choice further.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Toyota Yaris is very slightly cheaper – starting at 21,900 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,057 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota Yaris uses 3.8 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 1.6 L/100km.

Yaris

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota Yaris offers markedly more power – delivering 280 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 112 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota Yaris is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.5 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Toyota Yaris delivers noticeably more torque with 390 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota Yaris is markedly lighter – 1,090 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 226 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers substantially more boot space – 523 L compared to 286 L. That’s a difference of about 237 L.

When it comes to payload, the Toyota Yaris carries slightly more – 525 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 56 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota Yaris is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,900
Yaris

Toyota Yaris

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid, Petrol
  • Transmission Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 116 - 280 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.8 - 8.7 L/100km
Ford Puma
Toyota Yaris

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details

Toyota Yaris

The Yaris is a compact hatchback that blends everyday practicality with Toyota’s long-standing reputation for reliability, making it easy to live with in city traffic. Its nimble handling and sensible interior make the Yaris a smart choice for drivers who want straightforward, fuss-free transport.

details
Ford Puma
Toyota Yaris

Costs and Consumption

Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
21,900 - 40,800 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 8.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
87 - 197 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,090 - 1,356 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
141 - 286 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,745 - 1,805 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
289 - 525 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
116 - 280 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.5 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
390 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
85 - 206 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1,490 - 1,618 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G
Brand
Ford
Brand
Toyota
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.