Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Volvo V60 comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 350 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 51,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Volvo V60?
Ford Puma vs Volvo V60: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Puma is considerably cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Volvo V60 costs 51,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 27,506 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo V60 uses 2 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 3.4 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers considerably more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 318 km more than the Volvo V60.
V60
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo V60 offers considerably more power – delivering 350 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 182 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo V60 is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo V60 delivers clearly more torque with 589 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 299 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,734 kg. The difference is around 418 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers only slightly more boot space – 523 L compared to 519 L. That’s a difference of about 4 L.
When it comes to payload, the Volvo V60 carries barely more – 506 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 37 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo V60 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £51,400
Volvo V60
Ford Puma
Volvo V60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Volvo V60
The Volvo V60 blends elegant Scandinavian design with a practical estate layout, making it a composed and sensible choice for buyers who want style without sacrifice. Inside, a serene cabin, clever safety features and a supple ride turn daily commutes and weekend getaways into effortless, grown-up motoring.
details
Ford Puma
Volvo V60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
51,400 - 62,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2 - 6.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
99 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
45 - 141 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,734 - 2,070 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,850 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
460 - 506 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
197 - 350 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 589 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
145 - 247 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Volvo
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.