VS

Ford Ranger vs Jeep Compass – Differences & prices compared

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Ford Ranger or Jeep Compass?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ranger @ media.ford.com

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Jeep Compass has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34200 £, while the Ford Ranger costs 37500 £. That’s a price difference of around 3325 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Jeep Compass manages with 2 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Ford Ranger with 3.10 L. The difference is about 1.10 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Jeep Compass performs clearly better – achieving up to 500 km, about 458 km more than the Ford Ranger.

Compass @ media.stellantis.com

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger has a a bit edge – offering 292 HP compared to 240 HP. That’s roughly 52 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jeep Compass is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 7.30 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 7.90 s. That’s about 0.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Jeep Compass performs slight better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Ford Ranger tops out at 190 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Ranger pulls decisively stronger with 697 Nm compared to 345 Nm. That’s about 352 Nm difference.

Ranger @ media.ford.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Jeep Compass is distinct lighter – 1575 kg compared to 2082 kg. The difference is around 507 kg.

When it comes to payload, Ford Ranger convincingly takes the win – 1108 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 638 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Jeep Compass shows itself to be slightly ahead and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £34,200
02_jeeprcompassehybrid-61e929f23b1b7_61e99b0034e28

Jeep Compass

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 130 - 240 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2 - 5.9 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.50 kWh
  • Electric Range : 36 - 500 km

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger stands out in the pickup market with its robust build and versatile capabilities, making it a popular choice for both work and leisure. Its modern design is complemented by a well-equipped interior, providing comfort and advanced technology. Whether tackling challenging terrains or cruising through the city, the Ranger delivers a reliable and dynamic driving experience.

details

Jeep Compass

2 (1)
rate

The Jeep Compass combines a rugged aesthetic with modern sophistication, making it a standout choice in the compact SUV segment. Its robust design is complemented by a comfortable interior that offers ample space and cutting-edge technology for a seamless driving experience. Whether tackling urban environments or venturing off-road, the Compass provides versatility and reliability, embodying the adventurous spirit synonymous with the Jeep brand.

details
Ford Ranger
Jeep Compass
Ranger
Compass

Costs and Consumption

Price
37500 - 71900 £
Price
34200 - 46900 £
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 13.8 L
Consumption L/100km
2 - 5.9 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.50 kWh
Electric Range
42 km
Electric Range
36 - 500 km
Battery Capacity
11.80 kWh
Battery Capacity
74 kWh
co2
70 - 315 g/km
co2
0 - 133 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
80 L
Fuel tank capacity
36 - 55 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Pickup
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
2 - 4
Doors
5
Curb weight
2082 - 2511 kg
Curb weight
1575 - 2198 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
420 - 550 L
Length
5370 - 5420 mm
Length
4404 - 4552 mm
Width
1918 - 1968 mm
Width
1819 mm
Height
1868 - 1922 mm
Height
1629 - 1675 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1230 - 1387 L
Payload
676 - 1108 kg
Payload
465 - 470 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
170 - 292 HP
Power HP
130 - 240 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 12.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
Max Speed
180 - 200 km/h
Torque
405 - 697 Nm
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
125 - 215 kW
Power kW
96 - 177 kW
Engine capacity
1996 - 2993 cm3
Engine capacity
1199 - 1469 cm3

General

Model Year
2022 - 2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B, A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Jeep
What drive types are available for the Ford Ranger?

The Ford Ranger is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.