Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Ranger vs Mercedes EQS SUV – Performance, range & efficiency compared
Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Ford Ranger or Mercedes EQS SUV?
Ranger
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Ranger has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 37500 £, while the Mercedes EQS SUV costs 95000 £. That’s a price difference of around 57447 £.
As for range, the Mercedes EQS SUV performs convincingly better – achieving up to 695 km, about 653 km more than the Ford Ranger.
EQS SUV
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQS SUV has a clearly edge – offering 658 HP compared to 292 HP. That’s roughly 366 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQS SUV is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.40 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 7.90 s. That’s about 3.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mercedes EQS SUV performs minimal better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Ford Ranger tops out at 190 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes EQS SUV pulls evident stronger with 950 Nm compared to 697 Nm. That’s about 253 Nm difference.
Ranger
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Ranger is clearly perceptible lighter – 2082 kg compared to 2695 kg. The difference is around 613 kg.
When it comes to payload, Ford Ranger clearly takes the win – 1108 kg compared to 570 kg. That’s a difference of about 538 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Mercedes EQS SUV shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £95,000
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
Mercedes EQS SUV
Ford Ranger
The Ford Ranger stands out in the pickup market with its robust build and versatile capabilities, making it a popular choice for both work and leisure. Its modern design is complemented by a well-equipped interior, providing comfort and advanced technology. Whether tackling challenging terrains or cruising through the city, the Ranger delivers a reliable and dynamic driving experience.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Mercedes EQS SUV
The Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV redefines luxury in the electric vehicle segment with its elegant design and cutting-edge technology. Its spacious interior provides exceptional comfort, featuring high-quality materials and innovative ambient lighting to create a serene driving environment. This SUV impressively combines sustainability with performance, offering a smooth and quiet ride without compromising on power.
details
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
Ford Ranger
Mercedes EQS SUV
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
37500 - 71900 £
|
Price
95000 - 212100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 13.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.6 - 21.9 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
42 km
|
Electric Range
615 - 695 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
11.80 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
108.4 - 118 kWh
|
|
co2
70 - 315 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
80 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
|
Doors
2 - 4
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2082 - 2511 kg
|
Curb weight
2695 - 3075 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
440 - 645 L
|
|
Length
5370 - 5420 mm
|
Length
5125 mm
|
|
Width
1918 - 1968 mm
|
Width
1959 - 2034 mm
|
|
Height
1868 - 1922 mm
|
Height
1718 - 1721 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
2100 L
|
|
Payload
676 - 1108 kg
|
Payload
425 - 570 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
170 - 292 HP
|
Power HP
360 - 658 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 12.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 6.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
|
Max Speed
210 km/h
|
|
Torque
405 - 697 Nm
|
Torque
568 - 950 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
125 - 215 kW
|
Power kW
265 - 484 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1996 - 2993 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2022 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
What drive types are available for the Ford Ranger?
The Ford Ranger is offered with All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.