Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Ranger vs Mercedes EQS SUV comparison
Compare performance (292 HP vs 658 HP), boot space and price (45,600 £ vs 95,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Mercedes EQS SUV?
Ranger
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Ranger is significantly cheaper – starting at 45,600 £ , while the Mercedes EQS SUV costs 95,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 49,389 £.
As for electric range, the Mercedes EQS SUV offers considerably more range – reaching up to 695 km, about 653 km more than the Ford Ranger.
EQS SUV
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQS SUV offers substantially more power – delivering 658 HP compared to 292 HP. That’s roughly 366 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQS SUV is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.4 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 7.9 s. That’s about 3.5 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Mercedes EQS SUV is very slightly faster – reaching 210 km/h, while the Ford Ranger tops out at 190 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQS SUV delivers clearly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 697 Nm. That’s about 253 Nm more.
Ranger
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Ranger is a bit lighter – 2,405 kg compared to 2,695 kg. The difference is around 290 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries significantly more – 989 kg compared to 570 kg. That’s a difference of about 419 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mercedes EQS SUV is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £95,000
Mercedes EQS SUV
Ford Ranger
Mercedes EQS SUV
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Ranger
The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.
details
Mercedes EQS SUV
The Mercedes EQS SUV blends limousine-level quiet and luxury with the commanding presence of an SUV, wrapping passengers in sumptuous materials and a futuristic, screen-dominated cabin. It drives with serene confidence and delivers the kind of effortless refinement that makes city commutes and long trips feel like first-class experiences — just be prepared for attention wherever you park it.
details
Ford Ranger
Mercedes EQS SUV
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
45,600 - 71,900 £
|
Price
95,000 - 212,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 13.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.6 - 21.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
42 km
|
Electric Range
615 - 695 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
11.8 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
108.4 - 118 kWh
|
|
co2
70 - 315 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
80 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
|
Curb weight
2,695 - 3,075 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
440 - 645 L
|
|
Length
5,370 - 5,381 mm
|
Length
5,125 mm
|
|
Width
1,918 - 1,968 mm
|
Width
1,959 - 2,034 mm
|
|
Height
1,884 - 1,922 mm
|
Height
1,718 - 1,721 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
2,100 L
|
|
Payload
676 - 989 kg
|
Payload
425 - 570 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
210 - 292 HP
|
Power HP
360 - 658 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 6.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
|
Max Speed
210 km/h
|
|
Torque
491 - 697 Nm
|
Torque
568 - 950 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
154 - 215 kW
|
Power kW
265 - 484 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,996 - 2,993 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.