VS

Ford Ranger vs Renault Austral comparison

Compare performance (281 HP vs 148 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 29,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Renault Austral?

Ford Ranger vs Renault Austral: Key differences

Ford Ranger

  • significantly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Renault Austral

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ranger

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Renault Austral is substantially cheaper – starting at 29,900 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,525 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Ranger uses 3.1 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Renault Austral with 6.4 L/100km. The difference is about 3.3 L/100km.

Austral

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers significantly more power – delivering 281 HP compared to 148 HP. That’s roughly 133 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Ranger is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 8.7 s, while the Renault Austral takes 9.9 s. That’s about 1.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers significantly more torque with 697 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 427 Nm more.

Ranger

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Austral is clearly lighter – 1,548 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 857 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries significantly more – 989 kg compared to 455 kg. That’s a difference of about 534 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Ranger holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Ranger

Ford Ranger

  • Engine Type Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 240 - 281 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
  • Electric Range 42 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault Austral
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Renault Austral and the Renault Symbioz represent two very different faces of Renault: the Austral is a production compact SUV focused on practicality and comfort, while the Symbioz is a concept show car that explores radical design and future technologies. Comparing them helps buyers choose …
Renault Austral
Renault Rafale
VS
The Renault Austral and Renault Rafale represent two different takes on the modern Renault SUV: the Austral is a practical, family-oriented compact SUV, while the Rafale aims for a sportier, more premium coupé-SUV character. This comparison focuses on real-world driving, features and ownership …
Ford Ranger
Renault Austral

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details
CAF9EC78-BCC5-44DD-A6CB-AA214C4B486C
A5679221-BE7E-4493-B2BF-37FB664B42A8

Reviews Ford Ranger

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Renault Austral

The Renault Austral is a stylish, well-built crossover that blends a comfortable ride with a spacious, modern cabin. It combines everyday-friendly refinement and contemporary technology with a focus on safety and practicality, making it a sensible choice for drivers who want an all-round family car.

details
r220291p
r220293p
r220394p
r221062p
r221121p
r221115p

Reviews Renault Austral

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Qashqai
Renault Austral
VS
Pick the Nissan Qashqai if you want a composed, easy-to-live-with compact SUV that feels refined and sensible on running costs; choose the Renault Austral if you crave a roomier, more stylish cabin with sharper tech and hybrid efficiency. Both have their charms — Qashqai is the safe, comfortable …
Renault Arkana
Renault Austral
VS
Choosing between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Austral comes down to whether you want a coupe‑styled compact SUV that prioritises flair and efficiency (Arkana) or a more conventional family SUV that emphasises space and refinement (Austral). This comparison will cut through the marketing to …
Kia Sportage
Renault Austral
VS
The Kia Sportage is the sensible, value-packed family SUV — comfortable, practical and a reliable all-rounder — while the Renault Austral plays the style card with a sharper interior, clever hybrid tech and more upmarket flair. Pick the Sportage for straightforward practicality and a friendlier …
Citroen C5 Aircross
Renault Austral
VS
Unsure whether the Citroen C5 Aircross or the Renault Austral is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Renault Austral
Renault Captur
VS
In the battle between the Renault Austral and the Renault Captur, the Austral impresses with its larger size and advanced technology, appealing to those seeking a more spacious family SUV. Meanwhile, the Captur continues to stand out with its compact design and exceptional maneuverability, making …
Ford Ranger
Maxus T60 MAX
VS
If you're choosing between the Ford Ranger and the Maxus T60 MAX, you're weighing a proven, globally popular midsize pickup against a newer, value-focused contender. I’ll compare their practicality, performance, comfort and running costs so you can pick the one that best fits your workday and …
Honda HR-V
Renault Austral
VS
Honda HR-V and Renault Austral go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Hyundai Tucson
Renault Austral
VS
Between the Hyundai Tucson and the Renault Austral, the Tucson plays the sensible all‑rounder with roomy practicality and reassuring refinement, while the Austral leans into fresh styling and hi‑tech flair that turns heads at the roundabout. If you want everyday comfort and sensible value, pick the …
Ford Ranger
Renault Austral

Costs and Consumption
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
Price
29,900 - 34,100 £
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
6.4 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
42 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
70 - 265 g/km
co2
145 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Pickup
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
Curb weight
1,548 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
555 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,918 mm
Width
1,825 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
845 - 989 kg
Payload
455 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
Power HP
148 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
Torque
270 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
Power kW
109 kW
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
Engine capacity
1,332 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Ford
Brand
Renault
What drivetrain options does the Ford Ranger have?

The Ford Ranger is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.