VS

Ford Ranger vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan comparison

Compare performance (281 HP vs 600 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 275,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Rolls-Royce Cullinan?

Ford Ranger vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan: Key differences

Ford Ranger

  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • moderately lighter
details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

  • substantially more power
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ranger

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Ranger is clearly cheaper – starting at 48,400 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan costs 275,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 226,961 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Ranger uses 3.1 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Rolls-Royce Cullinan with 16 L/100km. The difference is about 12.9 L/100km.

Cullinan

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers substantially more power – delivering 600 HP compared to 281 HP. That’s roughly 319 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 8.7 s. That’s about 3.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Cullinan delivers markedly more torque with 900 Nm compared to 697 Nm. That’s about 203 Nm more.

Ranger

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Ranger is moderately lighter – 2,405 kg compared to 2,660 kg. The difference is around 255 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries somewhat more – 989 kg compared to 840 kg. That’s a difference of about 149 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Ranger stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Ranger

Ford Ranger

  • Engine Type : Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 240 - 281 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 42 km
Ford Ranger
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

The Cullinan seamlessly combines the hallmark luxury of Rolls-Royce with the rugged versatility of an SUV, making it a true standout in the automotive landscape. Its impeccably crafted interior envelops passengers in a serene atmosphere, complemented by advanced technology and unparalleled comfort. With its commanding presence on the road, the Cullinan redefines what it means to travel in style without compromising on capability.

details
Ford Ranger
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption

Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
Price
275,400 - 324,600 £
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
16 - 16.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
42 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
70 - 265 g/km
co2
363 - 380 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Pickup
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
Curb weight
2,660 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
555 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,918 mm
Width
2,000 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
845 - 989 kg
Payload
840 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
Power HP
571 - 600 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
Torque
850 - 900 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
12
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
Power kW
420 - 441 kW
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Ford
Brand
Rolls-Royce
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.