VS

Ford Ranger vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (281 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Skoda Enyaq?

Ford Ranger vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

Ford Ranger

details

Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • slightly more power
  • significantly more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ranger

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Enyaq is clearly cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,591 £.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers significantly more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 547 km more than the Ford Ranger.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers slightly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 281 HP. That’s roughly 59 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 8.7 s. That’s about 3.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers barely more torque with 697 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 18 Nm more.

Ranger

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is moderately lighter – 2,074 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 331 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries substantially more – 989 kg compared to 526 kg. That’s a difference of about 463 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 449 - 589 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq are two different crossovers from Skoda that target distinct buyers: the Enyaq is a family-sized battery-electric SUV focused on range, cabin space and low running costs, while the Elroq is a smaller, more affordable compact crossover aimed at practical everyday use …
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX60
VS
Practical Czech engineering goes up against Swedish style in our showdown between the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo EX60. The Enyaq focuses on roomy practicality and sensible value, while the EX60 answers with sharper design, richer tech and a more premium feel — choose based on whether you want …
Ford Ranger
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details
CAF9EC78-BCC5-44DD-A6CB-AA214C4B486C
A5679221-BE7E-4493-B2BF-37FB664B42A8

Reviews Ford Ranger

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details
04_new_skoda_enyaq_68cf74d6-1920x1280
11_new_skoda_enyaq_c2b962a0-1920x1280
12_new_skoda_enyaq_de0afe4c-1920x1280
33_new_skoda_enyaq_833cbb5e-1920x1440
48_new_skoda_enyaq_interior_dad4ad75-1920x1280
49_new_skoda_enyaq_interior_37c35e34-1920x1280
50_new_skoda_enyaq_coupe_f55ae8bb-1920x1858

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
Delporte
16 May 2026, 16:33:37

More options and more room for discounts and negotiation, just as comfortable, better than a Hyundai Ioniq 5 (which is not comfortable at all), a Toyota bZ4X (feels cramped and has little space), a Tesla Model Y Premium (a bit too high-tech for me but otherwise fine), a Jaecoo 5 (entry-level, comfort impeccable but no options and little tech), and an Omoda (less comfortable and very few options). This is all a personal opinion — we drove the cars mentioned above and the Skoda seems the best value for money with good comfort, a variety of options and reliable after-sales service close to us.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Well‑thought-out and practical car (85x MY2024) that unfortunately lets you down because of system bugs and irritating driver‑assist systems that can't cope with ordinary autumn or winter weather without throwing up error messages and warnings.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Epiq
VS
Quick comparison between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Epiq to help you decide which fits your needs. Note: I don’t find any official Skoda model called “Epiq” — did you mean the Skoda Kamiq, Kodiaq, or another Škoda model?
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7
VS
The Skoda Enyaq and the VW ID.7 share the VW Group’s MEB electric platform, but they’re aimed at different buyers. The Enyaq is a practical, family-focused SUV that emphasizes interior space, usability and value, while the ID.7 is a sleek, aerodynamic saloon tuned for long-range efficiency and …
Skoda Karoq
Skoda Enyaq
VS
The Skoda Karoq and Skoda Enyaq target different needs: the Karoq is a compact, practical crossover geared to everyday family use and tight-city driving, while the Enyaq is a fully electric, roomier SUV focused on range, efficiency and lower running costs. This comparison will help you decide which …
CUPRA Tavascan
Skoda Enyaq
VS
The Cupra Tavascan and Skoda Enyaq are both electric SUVs from the Volkswagen Group, but they target different buyers: the Tavascan focuses on sporty design and driving dynamics, while the Enyaq emphasizes practicality, interior space and value. This comparison will show where each model excels so …
Kia EV3
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Here’s a quick comparison between the Kia EV3 and the Skoda Enyaq to help you decide which electric car suits your needs. The Kia EV3 is a compact, city-focused EV that prioritises efficiency and value, while the Skoda Enyaq is a roomier, more family-oriented SUV with greater range and practicality.
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX40
VS
The Skoda Enyaq bundles generous space, sensible packaging and impressive range into a down‑to‑earth package that undercuts rivals on price and practicality. The Volvo EX40, by contrast, offers sharper styling, a posher interior and tauter handling — Scandi calm and high‑tech polish for buyers who …
Skoda Enyaq
Kia EV5
VS
Comparing the Škoda Enyaq and the Kia EV5 pits two spacious, family-friendly electric SUVs against each other: the Enyaq focuses on practicality, value and a straightforward user experience, while the EV5 emphasizes cutting-edge cabin tech, distinctive styling and a more premium feel. This short …
BMW iX1
Skoda Enyaq
VS
The BMW iX1 and Skoda Enyaq are compact electric SUVs that take very different approaches: the iX1 emphasizes dynamic driving, premium materials and a BMW-focused tech experience, while the Enyaq prioritizes interior space, practicality and straightforward value. This comparison will highlight the …
Ford Ranger
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
42 km
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
70 - 265 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Pickup
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,918 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
845 - 989 kg
Payload
449 - 526 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel, Plug-in Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Skoda
What drivetrain options does the Ford Ranger have?

The Ford Ranger is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.