Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Ranger vs Toyota Proace City Compact Van comparison
Compare performance (281 HP vs 136 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 22,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Toyota Proace City Compact Van?
Ford Ranger vs Toyota Proace City Compact Van: Key differences
Ranger
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Toyota Proace City Compact Van is clearly cheaper – starting at 22,400 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 26,086 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Ranger uses 3.1 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Toyota Proace City Compact Van with 5.2 L/100km. The difference is about 2.1 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van offers clearly more range – reaching up to 337 km, about 295 km more than the Ford Ranger.
Proace City Compact Van
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers considerably more power – delivering 281 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 145 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Ranger is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.7 s, while the Toyota Proace City Compact Van takes 11.1 s. That’s about 2.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers significantly more torque with 697 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 397 Nm more.
Ranger
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Toyota Proace City Compact Van is clearly lighter – 1,358 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 1,047 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries only slightly more – 989 kg compared to 921 kg. That’s a difference of about 68 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Toyota Proace City Compact Van holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £22,400
Toyota Proace City Compact Van
Ford Ranger
Toyota Proace City Compact Van
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Ranger
The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.
details
Toyota Proace City Compact Van
The Toyota Proace City Compact Van is a city-savvy workhorse that packs surprising practicality and smart packaging into a friendly, easy-to-drive package. It’s the kind of van that gets the job done without fuss — reliable, economical and just sensible enough to make fleet managers smile.
details
Ford Ranger
Toyota Proace City Compact Van
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
|
Price
22,400 - 37,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 6.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
42 km
|
Electric Range
337 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
70 - 265 g/km
|
co2
0 - 149 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
3 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
|
Curb weight
1,358 - 1,837 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,918 mm
|
Width
1,848 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
845 - 989 kg
|
Payload
560 - 921 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 136 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 13.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 100 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,499 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, E
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Toyota
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.