VS

Ford Ranger vs VW T-Roc comparison

Compare performance (281 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 26,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or VW T-Roc?

Ford Ranger vs VW T-Roc: Key differences

Ford Ranger

  • considerably more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
details

VW T-Roc

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • substantially lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ranger

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

VW T-Roc is significantly cheaper – starting at 26,400 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 22,001 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Ranger uses 3.1 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 2.4 L/100km.

T-Roc

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers considerably more power – delivering 281 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 131 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Ranger is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 8.7 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.9 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers considerably more torque with 697 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 447 Nm more.

Ranger

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, VW T-Roc is substantially lighter – 1,465 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 940 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries clearly more – 989 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 474 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Ranger holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Ranger

Ford Ranger

  • Engine Type Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 240 - 281 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
  • Electric Range 42 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Kamiq and the VW T‑Roc comes down to whether you prioritise everyday practicality and value or a bolder, slightly sportier compact SUV. Both share similar underpinnings, but the Kamiq excels in interior space and efficiency while the T‑Roc offers sharper styling and a …
VW Golf
VW T-Roc
VS
Deciding between the VW Golf and the VW T‑Roc is about choosing whether you prefer a classic, driver-focused hatchback or a compact SUV with higher ride height and added practicality. The Golf delivers sharper handling and refined efficiency, while the T‑Roc brings more interior space and a more …
Ford Ranger
VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details
CAF9EC78-BCC5-44DD-A6CB-AA214C4B486C
A5679221-BE7E-4493-B2BF-37FB664B42A8

Reviews Ford Ranger

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

VW T-Roc

The Volkswagen T‑Roc is a stylish, well-proportioned crossover that blends hatchback agility with SUV presence. It delivers a comfortable cabin, user-friendly tech and a composed ride, making it a sensible choice for buyers who want practicality with a bit of character.

details
DB2025AU01832_medium
DB2025AU01833_medium
DB2025AU01840_medium
DB2025AU01844_medium
DB2025AU01835_medium
DB2025AU01866_medium
DB2025AU01834_medium
DB2025AU01852_medium

Reviews VW T-Roc

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
Krock
17 Jul 2026, 13:11:35

If a designer had suggested such ugly dashboards a few years ago, he would have been fired immediately!
Today everyone thinks it’s great when you place cutting boards vertically on the hard‑plastic dashboards and even pay a lot of money for it. I’m probably already too old to understand this!!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Ester
17 Sept 2025, 14:29:41

I've been driving the VW T‑Roc for a few months now and I'm totally satisfied. 🚗 The higher seating position gives me a great feeling of security and the visibility in city traffic is excellent. I especially like the modern infotainment system — everything works intuitively and quickly. On the motorway it feels very calm and stable, even at higher speeds. Overall a great car that's a lot of fun and still economical.

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Roc
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …
SEAT Arona
VW T-Roc
VS
Sibling rivalry in compact-SUV clothing: the SEAT Arona and VW T‑Roc go head-to-head — one brings Spanish spice and value, the other German polish and refinement. We’ll compare driving feel, practicality, tech and running costs so you can pick the compact crossover that deserves a spot in your …
SEAT Ateca
VW T-Roc
VS
The SEAT Ateca and the VW T‑Roc are two closely related compact crossover SUVs from the Volkswagen Group, each offering a blend of practicality, comfort and engaging driving manners. This comparison will highlight where the Ateca’s straightforward value and roomy practicality differ from the …
Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
Choosing between the Audi Q3 and the VW T‑Roc comes down to whether you value Audi’s upmarket feel and refinement or the T‑Roc’s sharper pricing and practical versatility. This comparison focuses on real-world driving, interior quality, technology and running costs to help you decide which compact …
Lexus LBX
VW T-Roc
VS
The Lexus LBX feels like a posh city cocoon — whisper-quiet, well-stitched and leaning into hybrid efficiency and premium touches — while the VW T‑Roc is a cheeky, practical all-rounder that drives with more snap, offers more space and gives better value for the money. Choose the LBX if you want …
Ford Kuga
VW T-Roc
VS
In the compact-SUV ring, the Ford Kuga and the VW T‑Roc step up: one leans on family-friendly practicality and hybrid efficiency, the other on sharp styling and city-ready agility. We’ll compare space, economy, driving feel and value so you can choose whether you want sensible muscle or fashionable …
Mercedes GLA
VW T-Roc
VS
The Mercedes GLA and the VW T‑Roc are compact crossover SUVs that aim to deliver city-friendly size with SUV practicality, but they take different approaches to luxury, technology and driving character. Choose the GLA if you prioritise a plush interior and refined on-road manners; pick the T‑Roc …
Renault Symbioz
VW T-Roc
VS
Comparing the Renault Symbioz and the Volkswagen T‑Roc pits Renault's Symbioz concept — a forward-looking electric and autonomous showcase — against the T‑Roc, Volkswagen's practical compact crossover for everyday use. This short comparison will help you decide whether you're drawn to cutting-edge …
Ford Ranger
VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
Price
26,400 - 38,600 £
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
42 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
70 - 265 g/km
co2
126 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Pickup
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
Curb weight
1,465 - 1,539 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
284 - 475 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,918 mm
Width
1,811 - 1,828 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
845 - 989 kg
Payload
368 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
Brand
Ford
Brand
VW
What drivetrain options does the Ford Ranger have?

The Ford Ranger is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.