VS

GWM ORA 03 vs Suzuki S-Cross comparison

Compare performance (171 HP vs 110 HP), boot space and price (33,400 £ vs 21,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – GWM ORA 03 or Suzuki S-Cross?

GWM ORA 03 vs Suzuki S-Cross: Key differences

GWM ORA 03

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
details

Suzuki S-Cross

4.6 (10 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • noticeably lighter
  • clearly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ORA 03

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Suzuki S-Cross is clearly cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the GWM ORA 03 costs 33,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,658 £.

S-Cross

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the GWM ORA 03 offers markedly more power – delivering 171 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 61 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the GWM ORA 03 delivers marginally more torque with 250 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 15 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is noticeably lighter – 1,280 kg compared to 1,615 kg. The difference is around 335 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Suzuki S-Cross offers clearly more boot space – 430 L compared to 228 L. That’s a difference of about 202 L.

When it comes to payload, the Suzuki S-Cross carries somewhat more – 405 kg compared to 355 kg. That’s a difference of about 50 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The GWM ORA 03 is slightly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £33,400
ORA 03

GWM ORA 03

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 171 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.5 - 16.8 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 310 - 420 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Suzuki Vitara take different approaches to the compact SUV segment: the S-Cross leans towards comfort, refinement and value, while the Vitara offers a more rugged look and a livelier driving character. I’ll outline their strengths in space, ride, economy and equipment to …
Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Toyota Yaris Cross are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want SUV practicality in a city-friendly package. The S-Cross leans toward space and straightforward value, while the Yaris Cross prioritises hybrid efficiency, urban agility and advanced safety tech—so pick …
GWM ORA 03
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

GWM ORA 03

The ORA 03 is a cheeky, design-led electric compact that pairs bold looks with a surprisingly practical interior, giving buyers a fresh alternative to the usual sober choices. It’s easy to live with day-to-day thanks to clever packaging, modern tech and city-friendly manners, so shoppers after an affordable EV with personality should put the ORA 03 on their shortlist.

details
serpimg_viy3F5

Reviews GWM ORA 03

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Suzuki S-Cross

The Suzuki S-Cross is a practical, well-built compact crossover that puts comfort, efficiency and everyday reliability first. With a roomy cabin, straightforward technology and sensible design, it’s a no-nonsense choice for buyers seeking a versatile family car.

details
Suzuki_S-Cross_001
Suzuki_S-Cross_004
Suzuki_S-Cross_016
Suzuki_S-Cross_037
Suzuki_S-Cross_040
Suzuki_S-Cross_049
S-CROSS_innen2

Reviews Suzuki S-Cross

4.6 (10 Reviews)
rate
Piero
16 Sept 2026, 14:22:56

Nimble, spacious and economical, it starts quietly and without jerks thanks to the mild-hybrid system.
Robust and not thirsty (personally 5.5 L/100 km combined, with aggressive driving).
I prefer reliability above any other argument, and that of its 4-cylinder engine, with a steel timing chain and intelligent mild-hybrid system, is by far the best in its class.
Ultimately, very, very happy with my choice!

Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Peter
24 Aug 2026, 23:05:21

Value for money

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Miroljub
6 Nov 2025, 11:17:36

best

Frequently compared as well

Dacia Duster
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Choosing between the Dacia Duster and the Suzuki S-Cross is about whether you want rugged simplicity and great value or a more refined, comfortable compact crossover. This comparison will focus on real-world space, economy, driving feel and running costs to help you decide which suits your needs.
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota RAV4
VS
When comparing the Suzuki S-Cross to the Toyota RAV4, the former impresses with its affordability and practicality, making it an excellent choice for urban drivers on a budget. The Toyota RAV4, on the other hand, offers a more robust driving experience with superior handling and a reputation for …
Ford Puma
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the world of compact SUVs, the Ford Puma and Suzuki S-Cross each bring unique strengths to the table. The Ford Puma turns heads with its athletic design and responsive EcoBoost engine, ideal for those who prioritize style and dynamic driving. Meanwhile, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more pragmatic …
Suzuki S-Cross
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Dacia Bigster are two compact crossovers aimed at buyers who prioritize practicality, affordability and low running costs. The S-Cross leans on refined packaging, proven reliability and efficient drivetrain options, while the Bigster trades some polish for a larger …
Mitsubishi ASX
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive realm of compact crossovers, the Mitsubishi ASX and Suzuki S-Cross offer distinct value propositions for discerning buyers. The ASX impresses with its robust design and spacious interior, making it a practical choice for families and adventure seekers alike. Meanwhile, the Suzuki …
Peugeot 2008
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Peugeot 2008 stands out with its striking design and high-quality interior, offering a premium feel that rivals more expensive options. Meanwhile, the Suzuki S-Cross impresses with its practicality and robust all-wheel-drive capabilities, making it a …
Skoda Karoq
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
The Skoda Karoq and Suzuki S‑Cross are compact crossover SUVs aimed at buyers who want a practical, comfortable daily driver with a raised seating position and SUV versatility. This comparison focuses on interior space, comfort, driving dynamics, equipment and running costs to help you decide which …
GWM ORA 03
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
33,400 - 42,400 £
Price
21,800 - 34,200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 16.8 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
310 - 420 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
119 - 138 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,615 - 1,655 kg
Curb weight
1,280 - 1,385 kg
Trunk capacity
228 L
Trunk capacity
430 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,825 - 1,848 mm
Width
1,785 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
315 - 355 kg
Payload
395 - 405 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
171 HP
Power HP
110 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 - 8.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 Nm
Torque
235 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
126 kW
Power kW
81 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
GWM
Brand
Suzuki
What drivetrain options does the GWM ORA 03 have?

The GWM ORA 03 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.