@ Mazda Motor Corporation
VS

GWM WEY 03 vs Mazda CX-80 - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (442 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (41100 £ vs 48200 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – GWM WEY 03 or Mazda CX-80?

GWM WEY 03

Mazda CX-80

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

GWM WEY 03 has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41100 £, while the Mazda CX-80 costs 48200 £. That’s a price difference of around 7157 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: GWM WEY 03 manages with 0.50 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 1.60 L. The difference is about 1.10 L per 100 km.

As for range, the GWM WEY 03 performs significantly better – achieving up to 139 km, about 78 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the GWM WEY 03 has a evident edge – offering 442 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 115 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the GWM WEY 03 is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 5.30 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.80 s. That’s about 1.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the GWM WEY 03 performs minimal better – reaching 230 km/h, while the Mazda CX-80 tops out at 219 km/h. The difference is around 11 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: GWM WEY 03 pulls a bit stronger with 685 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 135 Nm difference.

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers evident more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is hardly perceptible lighter – 2131 kg compared to 2175 kg. The difference is around 44 kg.

In terms of boot space, the GWM WEY 03 offers significantly more room – 517 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 259 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-80 performs distinct better – up to 1971 L, which is about 682 L more than the GWM WEY 03.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-80 convincingly takes the win – 650 kg compared to 375 kg. That’s a difference of about 275 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the GWM WEY 03 shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £41,100
default

GWM WEY 03

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 367 - 442 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.50 L
  • Electric Range : 130 - 139 km
details
GWM WEY 03
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

GWM WEY 03

The WEY 03 cuts a striking figure with sharp, futuristic styling and an interior that punches above its weight for premium feel and tech. For buyers after distinctive looks, a comfy cabin and confident handling without the same badge drama, it’s a compelling alternative that also adds a dash of personality to everyday driving.

details

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Reviews GWM WEY 03

Reviews Mazda CX-80

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC90
VS
In the showdown between the Mazda CX-80 and the Volvo XC90, both vehicles offer a compelling blend of luxury and practicality. While the CX-80 impresses with its sporty handling and sleek design, the XC90 shines with its superior safety features and spacious interior. Ultimately, the choice may …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent …
GWM WEY 03
Mazda CX-80
CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price
41100 - 47900 £
Price
48200 - 60200 £
Consumption L/100km
0.50 L
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 5.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
130 - 139 km
Electric Range
61 km
Battery Capacity
28.90 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
15 g/km
co2
35 - 151 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
Fuel tank capacity
70 - 74 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2175 - 2295 kg
Curb weight
2131 - 2240 kg
Trunk capacity
517 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
4688 mm
Length
4995 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1890 mm
Height
1730 mm
Height
1714 mm
Max trunk capacity
1289 L
Max trunk capacity
1971 L
Payload
375 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
367 - 442 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 7.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
230 km/h
Max Speed
195 - 219 km/h
Torque
500 - 685 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
270 - 325 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
1998 cm3
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
GWM
Brand
Mazda

Similar Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
VS
In the latest face-off between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron, drivers will find compelling features that cater to different preferences. The CX-80 boasts a sleek design with a focus on driver engagement and a spacious interior, while the Tayron impresses with its technology and practicality. …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the bustling mid-size SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 compete fiercely with their distinctive attributes. The CX-60 boasts a more compact, urban-friendly design, making it ideal for city drivers, while the larger CX-80 offers expansive interior space and additional seating, targeting …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Highlander
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a more premium feel than many of its rivals. Meanwhile, the Toyota Highlander impresses with its spacious interior and reputation for reliability, making it an attractive …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Touareg
VS
In the showdown between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Touareg, the Mazda shines with its sleek design and fuel-efficient performance that appeals to drivers seeking both aesthetics and economy. Conversely, the Touareg stands out by offering a luxurious interior and robust powertrain options that cater …
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Honda CR-V
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-80 present compelling options for those seeking a versatile SUV. The CR-V stands out with its robust reliability and spacious interior, making it an ideal choice for families. Meanwhile, the CX-80 offers a sportier driving experience with …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Mazda CX-80 and Volvo XC60 stand out with their distinct approaches to luxury and practicality. The CX-80 impresses with its engaging driving dynamics and stylish design, making it a favorite for those who prioritize performance and aesthetics. Meanwhile, …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
Land Rover Discovery
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-80 or the Land Rover Discovery is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
Mitsubishi Outlander
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and Mitsubishi Outlander compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Is the GWM WEY 03 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.