VS

Honda CR-V vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (184 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (40,200 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Honda CR-V or Skoda Enyaq?

Honda CR-V vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

Honda CR-V

4.7 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly lighter
  • barely more trunk space
details

Skoda Enyaq

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • barely cheaper
  • significantly more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CR-V

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Skoda Enyaq is barely cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the Honda CR-V costs 40,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,352 £.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers clearly more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 511 km more than the Honda CR-V.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers significantly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 156 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Honda CR-V takes 9 s. That’s about 3.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers clearly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 335 Nm. That’s about 344 Nm more.

CR-V

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Honda CR-V is slightly lighter – 1,821 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 253 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Honda CR-V offers barely more boot space – 617 L compared to 585 L. That’s a difference of about 32 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries very slightly more – 526 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 51 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 449 - 589 km
Honda CR-V
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Honda CR-V

The Honda CR-V blends sensible practicality with a polished feel, offering roomy interiors and a confident ride that keeps commutes and weekend escapes equally comfortable. Its unshowy styling and reliable reputation make it a smart, low‑drama choice for buyers who want versatility without fuss — the kind of car that quietly makes everyday life a little easier.

details

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details
Honda CR-V
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption

Price
40,200 - 48,800 £
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 6.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
78 km
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
59 - 152 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,821 - 1,988 kg
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Trunk capacity
579 - 617 L
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,866 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
439 - 475 kg
Payload
449 - 526 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
184 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
335 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
135 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
1,993 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Honda
Brand
Skoda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.