Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Jaguar E-Pace vs Ford Puma comparison
Compare performance (269 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (32,400 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jaguar E-Pace or Ford Puma?
Jaguar E-Pace vs Ford Puma: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
E-Pace
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma is noticeably cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Jaguar E-Pace costs 32,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,486 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jaguar E-Pace uses 1.4 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 4 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers considerably more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 348 km more than the Jaguar E-Pace.
Puma
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Jaguar E-Pace offers noticeably more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 101 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jaguar E-Pace is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 7.3 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Jaguar E-Pace delivers substantially more torque with 540 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm more.
E-Pace
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is visibly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,783 kg. The difference is around 467 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers very slightly more boot space – 523 L compared to 494 L. That’s a difference of about 29 L.
When it comes to payload, the Jaguar E-Pace carries somewhat more – 554 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 85 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Jaguar E-Pace is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £32,400
Jaguar E-Pace
Jaguar E-Pace
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Jaguar E-Pace
The Jaguar E-Pace brings compact SUV practicality together with taut, sporty design and unmistakable British charm, helping it stand out in a crowded class. Inside, the cabin feels premium and the driving manners are engaging enough to keep a grin on your face, making it a tempting choice for buyers who want Jaguar style without the bulk.
details
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Jaguar E-Pace
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
32,400 - 56,100 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 8.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
69 km
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
11.5 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
33 - 185 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 67 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,783 - 2,173 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
494 L
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
|
Length
4,395 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,984 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
1,648 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,170 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
497 - 554 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 10.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
190 - 211 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
Jaguar
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.