Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Jaguar F-Pace vs Skoda Kodiaq comparison
Compare performance (575 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (56,400 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jaguar F-Pace or Skoda Kodiaq?
Jaguar F-Pace vs Skoda Kodiaq: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
F-Pace
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Skoda Kodiaq is clearly cheaper – starting at 37,900 £ , while the Jaguar F-Pace costs 56,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,523 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Jaguar F-Pace with 1.8 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Kodiaq offers considerably more range – reaching up to 122 km, about 58 km more than the Jaguar F-Pace.
Kodiaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Jaguar F-Pace offers considerably more power – delivering 575 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 310 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jaguar F-Pace is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.3 s. That’s about 2.3 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Jaguar F-Pace is clearly faster – reaching 286 km/h, while the Skoda Kodiaq tops out at 226 km/h. The difference is around 60 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Jaguar F-Pace delivers considerably more torque with 700 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 300 Nm more.
F-Pace
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is slightly lighter – 1,684 kg compared to 1,951 kg. The difference is around 267 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers substantially more boot space – 910 L compared to 470 L. That’s a difference of about 440 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly more capacity – up to 2,105 L, about 677 L more than the Jaguar F-Pace.
When it comes to payload, the Jaguar F-Pace carries only slightly more – 589 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 26 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Jaguar F-Pace is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £56,400
Jaguar F-Pace
Jaguar F-Pace
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Jaguar F-Pace
Jaguar F-Pace blends the prowling presence of a sports car with the practicality of an SUV, looking elegant while rewarding drivers with lively handling. If you crave something that feels special every time you climb in and prefer style and driving flair over blending into the parking lot, the F-Pace is a classy, slightly cheeky alternative to the usual German suspects.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
Jaguar F-Pace
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
56,400 - 100,800 £
|
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.8 - 12 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
64 km
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
15.4 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
41 - 274 g/km
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
62 - 83 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,951 - 2,230 kg
|
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
354 - 470 L
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
|
Length
4,747 - 4,762 mm
|
Length
4,758 mm
|
|
Width
1,936 mm
|
Width
1,864 mm
|
|
Height
1,664 - 1,670 mm
|
Height
1,679 - 1,683 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,299 - 1,428 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2,105 L
|
|
Payload
457 - 589 kg
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
163 - 575 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 - 10.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
195 - 286 km/h
|
Max Speed
226 km/h
|
|
Torque
380 - 700 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 8
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
120 - 423 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,997 - 5,000 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
|
Brand
Jaguar
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.