Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Jaguar F-Pace vs Skoda Kodiaq - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (575 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (56400 £ vs 36800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jaguar F-Pace or Skoda Kodiaq?
F-Pace
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Skoda Kodiaq has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £ , while the Jaguar F-Pace costs 56400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 19552 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 1.50 L and is therefore distinct more efficient than the Jaguar F-Pace with 1.80 L. The difference is about 0.30 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Kodiaq performs decisively better – achieving up to 122 km, about 58 km more than the Jaguar F-Pace.
Kodiaq
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Jaguar F-Pace has a convincingly edge – offering 575 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 310 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jaguar F-Pace is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.30 s. That’s about 2.30 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Jaguar F-Pace performs slightly better – reaching 286 km/h, while the Skoda Kodiaq tops out at 231 km/h. The difference is around 55 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Jaguar F-Pace pulls clearly stronger with 700 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 300 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
F-Pace
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is a bit lighter – 1684 kg compared to 1951 kg. The difference is around 267 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers decisively more room – 910 L compared to 470 L. That’s a difference of about 440 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs noticeable better – up to 2105 L, which is about 677 L more than the Jaguar F-Pace.
When it comes to payload, Jaguar F-Pace hardly perceptible takes the win – 589 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 26 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Jaguar F-Pace holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Jaguar F-Pace
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £56,400
Jaguar F-Pace
Jaguar F-Pace
5 (1 Reviews)
Jaguar F-Pace blends the prowling presence of a sports car with the practicality of an SUV, looking elegant while rewarding drivers with lively handling. If you crave something that feels special every time you climb in and prefer style and driving flair over blending into the parking lot, the F-Pace is a classy, slightly cheeky alternative to the usual German suspects.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
5 (2 Reviews)
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
Jaguar F-Pace
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
56400 - 100800 £
|
Price
36800 - 49600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.8 - 12 L
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
64 km
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
15.40 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
41 - 274 g/km
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
62 - 83 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1951 - 2230 kg
|
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
354 - 470 L
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
|
Length
4747 - 4762 mm
|
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
|
|
Width
1936 mm
|
Width
1864 mm
|
|
Height
1664 - 1670 mm
|
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1299 - 1428 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2105 L
|
|
Payload
457 - 589 kg
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
163 - 575 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 - 10.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
195 - 286 km/h
|
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
|
|
Torque
380 - 700 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 8
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
120 - 423 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1997 - 5000 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
|
Brand
Jaguar
|
Brand
Skoda
|
What drive types are available for the Jaguar F-Pace?
Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.