Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Jeep Avenger vs Skoda Kodiaq comparison
Compare performance (156 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (22500 £ vs 36800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Avenger or Skoda Kodiaq?
Avenger
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Jeep Avenger has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 22500 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14306 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 1.50 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Jeep Avenger with 4.90 L. The difference is about 3.40 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Jeep Avenger performs convincingly better – achieving up to 400 km, about 278 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.
Kodiaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a significantly edge – offering 265 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 109 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Jeep Avenger takes 9 s. That’s about 2.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs to a small extent better – reaching 226 km/h, while the Jeep Avenger tops out at 194 km/h. The difference is around 32 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kodiaq pulls noticeable stronger with 400 Nm compared to 260 Nm. That’s about 140 Nm difference.
Avenger
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Jeep Avenger is decisively lighter – 1180 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 504 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers convincingly more room – 910 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 530 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs noticeable better – up to 2105 L, which is about 828 L more than the Jeep Avenger.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Kodiaq to a small extent takes the win – 563 kg compared to 502 kg. That’s a difference of about 61 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Kodiaq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Jeep Avenger
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £36,800
Skoda Kodiaq
Jeep Avenger
4.2 (4 Reviews)
The Jeep Avenger shrinks Jeep's boxy, adventurous styling into a city-friendly electric crossover that looks just as at home on tight streets as it does on muddy weekend lanes. It's a savvy pick for drivers who want go-anywhere attitude without the truck-size ego — practical inside, lively around town and ready to tackle a bit of rough stuff when the mood strikes.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
5 (4 Reviews)
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
Jeep Avenger
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
22500 - 36900 £
|
Price
36800 - 50600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.50 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
400 km
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
51 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 129 g/km
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1180 - 1520 kg
|
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
325 - 380 L
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
|
Length
4084 - 4088 mm
|
Length
4758 mm
|
|
Width
1776 mm
|
Width
1864 mm
|
|
Height
1527 - 1541 mm
|
Height
1679 - 1683 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1218 - 1277 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2105 L
|
|
Payload
494 - 502 kg
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
150 - 194 km/h
|
Max Speed
205 - 226 km/h
|
|
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023 - 2026
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Brand
Skoda
|
What drivetrain options does the Jeep Avenger have?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.