Two cars, one duel: Jeep Avenger meets Skoda Kodiaq.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Jeep Avenger has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21900 £, while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 14906 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 0.40 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Jeep Avenger with 4.90 L. The difference is about 4.50 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Jeep Avenger performs convincingly better – achieving up to 400 km, about 277 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a significantly edge – offering 265 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 109 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Jeep Avenger takes 9 s. That’s about 2.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs to a small extent better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Jeep Avenger tops out at 194 km/h. The difference is around 37 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kodiaq pulls noticeable stronger with 400 Nm compared to 260 Nm. That’s about 140 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Jeep Avenger is decisively lighter – 1180 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 504 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers convincingly more room – 910 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 530 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs noticeable better – up to 2105 L, which is about 828 L more than the Jeep Avenger.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Kodiaq slight takes the win – 545 kg compared to 502 kg. That’s a difference of about 43 kg.
Overall, the Skoda Kodiaq shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
The Jeep Avenger is a compact SUV that brings a blend of rugged design and modern technology, making it ideal for both urban and off-road adventures. Its robust build and distinctive styling capture Jeep's iconic spirit while offering a comfortable and refined driving experience. With advanced safety features and a versatile interior, the Avenger caters to a wide range of drivers looking for practicality and excitement.
detailsThe Škoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and sleek design, making it a popular choice for families and adventurers alike. Equipped with a range of modern features, it offers a comfortable driving experience and outstanding versatility. Its robust build and refined handling make it suitable for both urban settings and countryside escapades.
details|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21900 - 36900 £
|
Price
36800 - 49600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.50 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
400 km
|
Electric Range
113 - 123 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
51 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 129 g/km
|
co2
9 - 186 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1180 - 1520 kg
|
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
325 - 380 L
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
|
Length
4084 - 4088 mm
|
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
|
|
Width
1776 mm
|
Width
1864 mm
|
|
Height
1527 - 1541 mm
|
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1218 - 1277 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1945 - 2105 L
|
|
Payload
494 - 502 kg
|
Payload
460 - 545 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
150 - 194 km/h
|
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
|
|
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, F, G, E
|
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.