Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Jeep Compass vs Skoda Enyaq comparison
Compare performance (225 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Compass or Skoda Enyaq?
Jeep Compass vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Compass
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Jeep Compass is marginally cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 36,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,648 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is somewhat more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 17.5 kWh/100km for the Jeep Compass. That’s a difference of about 2.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers a bit more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 89 km more than the Jeep Compass.
Enyaq
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers visibly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 225 HP. That’s roughly 115 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Jeep Compass takes 8 s. That’s about 2.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers considerably more torque with 679 Nm compared to 345 Nm. That’s about 334 Nm more.
Compass
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Jeep Compass is clearly lighter – 1,667 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 407 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers only slightly more boot space – 585 L compared to 550 L. That’s a difference of about 35 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries somewhat more – 526 kg compared to 473 kg. That’s a difference of about 53 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Enyaq stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £36,800
Skoda Enyaq
Jeep Compass
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Jeep Compass
The Jeep Compass packs classic Jeep styling with a surprisingly composed demeanor, equally at home turning heads in the city or tackling a weekend dirt track. Inside it's a pragmatic, user-friendly compact SUV that prioritizes comfort and versatility — a smart pick if you want a dose of adventure without giving up everyday sense.
details
Skoda Enyaq
The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.
details
Jeep Compass
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 43,200 £
|
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3 - 5.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
95 - 500 km
|
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 127 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,667 - 2,198 kg
|
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
550 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
472 - 473 kg
|
Payload
449 - 526 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
145 - 225 HP
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
107 - 165 kW
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,596 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.