Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Jeep Compass vs Skoda Enyaq - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (213 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (34200 £ vs 38100 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Compass or Skoda Enyaq?
Compass
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Jeep Compass has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34200 £, while the Skoda Enyaq costs 38100 £. That’s a price difference of around 3857 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Enyaq: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s somewhat more efficient than the Jeep Compass with 17.50 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2.70 kWh.
As for range, the Skoda Enyaq performs slightly better – achieving up to 587 km, about 87 km more than the Jeep Compass.
Enyaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq has a distinct edge – offering 340 HP compared to 213 HP. That’s roughly 127 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Jeep Compass takes 8.50 s. That’s about 3.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Jeep Compass performs slight better – reaching 188 km/h, while the Skoda Enyaq tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 8 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Enyaq pulls significantly stronger with 679 Nm compared to 345 Nm. That’s about 334 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Compass
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Jeep Compass is distinct lighter – 1667 kg compared to 2002 kg. The difference is around 335 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers minimal more room – 585 L compared to 550 L. That’s a difference of about 35 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Enyaq performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1710 L, which is about 149 L more than the Jeep Compass.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Skoda Enyaq shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £38,100
Skoda Enyaq
Jeep Compass
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Jeep Compass
2 (1 Reviews)
The Jeep Compass packs classic Jeep styling with a surprisingly composed demeanor, equally at home turning heads in the city or tackling a weekend dirt track. Inside it's a pragmatic, user-friendly compact SUV that prioritizes comfort and versatility — a smart pick if you want a dose of adventure without giving up everyday sense.
details
Skoda Enyaq
5 (3 Reviews)
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
Jeep Compass
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34200 - 43200 £
|
Price
38100 - 52200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.80 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.50 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
500 km
|
Electric Range
428 - 587 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
74 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 77 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 130 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1667 - 2198 kg
|
Curb weight
2002 - 2293 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
550 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
4552 mm
|
Length
4658 mm
|
|
Width
1928 mm
|
Width
1879 mm
|
|
Height
1675 mm
|
Height
1605 - 1625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1561 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
457 - 509 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
145 - 213 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 - 188 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
107 - 157 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Brand
Skoda
|
What drivetrain options does the Jeep Compass have?
The Jeep Compass is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.