Compare performance (414 HP vs 281 HP), boot space and price (36,000 £ vs 48,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – KGM Musso EV or Ford Ranger?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
KGM Musso EV is visibly cheaper – starting at 36,000 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,448 £.
As for electric range, the KGM Musso EV offers substantially more range – reaching up to 420 km, about 378 km more than the Ford Ranger.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the KGM Musso EV offers clearly more power – delivering 414 HP compared to 281 HP. That’s roughly 133 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the KGM Musso EV is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 8.7 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers barely more torque with 697 Nm compared to 678 Nm. That’s about 19 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, KGM Musso EV is a bit lighter – 2,165 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 240 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries very slightly more – 989 kg compared to 905 kg. That’s a difference of about 84 kg.
The KGM Musso EV is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Musso EV blends pickup practicality with an electric drivetrain, delivering quiet performance and a roomy, well-equipped cabin that suits both work and everyday use. Its robust design and straightforward controls make it a compelling choice for buyers who want a capable utility vehicle with cleaner operation.
details
The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36,000 - 45,400 £
|
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
23 - 26 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
379 - 420 km
|
Electric Range
42 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
70 - 265 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,165 - 2,285 kg
|
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,920 mm
|
Width
1,918 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
805 - 905 kg
|
Payload
845 - 989 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
207 - 414 HP
|
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
339 - 678 Nm
|
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
152 - 304 kW
|
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
KGM
|
Brand
Ford
|