VS

KGM Musso EV vs Ford Ranger comparison

Compare performance (414 HP vs 281 HP), boot space and price (36,000 £ vs 48,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – KGM Musso EV or Ford Ranger?

KGM Musso EV vs Ford Ranger: Key differences

KGM Musso EV

  • visibly cheaper
  • clearly more power
  • substantially more electric range
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit lighter
details

Ford Ranger

details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Musso EV

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

KGM Musso EV is visibly cheaper – starting at 36,000 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,448 £.

As for electric range, the KGM Musso EV offers substantially more range – reaching up to 420 km, about 378 km more than the Ford Ranger.

Ranger

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the KGM Musso EV offers clearly more power – delivering 414 HP compared to 281 HP. That’s roughly 133 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the KGM Musso EV is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 8.7 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers barely more torque with 697 Nm compared to 678 Nm. That’s about 19 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, KGM Musso EV is a bit lighter – 2,165 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 240 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries very slightly more – 989 kg compared to 905 kg. That’s a difference of about 84 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The KGM Musso EV is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,000
Musso EV

KGM Musso EV

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 207 - 414 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 23 - 26 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 379 - 420 km
KGM Musso EV
Ford Ranger

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

KGM Musso EV

The Musso EV blends pickup practicality with an electric drivetrain, delivering quiet performance and a roomy, well-equipped cabin that suits both work and everyday use. Its robust design and straightforward controls make it a compelling choice for buyers who want a capable utility vehicle with cleaner operation.

details

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details
KGM Musso EV
Ford Ranger

Costs and Consumption

Price
36,000 - 45,400 £
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
23 - 26 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
379 - 420 km
Electric Range
42 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
70 - 265 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Pickup
Body Type
Pickup
Seats
5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,165 - 2,285 kg
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,920 mm
Width
1,918 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
805 - 905 kg
Payload
845 - 989 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
207 - 414 HP
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
339 - 678 Nm
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
152 - 304 kW
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
Brand
KGM
Brand
Ford
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.